Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cloture question WRT to Senate rule changes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
satireV Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:12 PM
Original message
Cloture question WRT to Senate rule changes
Edited on Mon May-23-05 05:13 PM by satireV
If my memory serves me well, the US Senate last changed it's cloture rules in 1975 from 2/3 majority to super majority or 60 votes.

Correct me if I am wrong here.

If the Senate moves to change the cloture rules again to 51 votes, does the current cloture rule apply?

IOW, can the minority use cloture rules to try and stop changes to the cloture rules? If the minority tries to filibuster the cloture changes, won,t it require 60 votes to stop debate on changing cloture?

My mind is foggy, but IIRC in 1975 there was a cloture vote before they changed the rule.

satireV

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is how it is supposed to happen

http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oId=18761

An erroneous and unprecedented point of order raised by a Senator, presumably Senator Frist, that the current 60-vote threshold to invoke cloture (end a filibuster) on a nomination is illegitimate (or “unconstitutional”), or that further debate on a nomination at some arbitrary point is “dilatory,” even though cloture has not been invoked as provided in the Senate Rules.

A ruling by the Chair, likely Vice President Cheney, that sustains the point of order even though it contradicts the Rules and precedents of the Senate and the advice of the Senate Parliamentarian.

An appeal of the ruling by a member of the Senate who objects to the ruling as contrary to the Rules and precedents of the Senate.

A nondebatable motion to table the appeal offered by Senator Frist which, if adopted by the Senate, ratifies the illegitimate ruling of the chair and completes the detonation of the nuclear option and the elimination of the 60-vote requirement for ending debate on judicial nominations. If the Senate is split 50-50 on the motion, Vice President Cheney will vote to break the tie and sustain his own ruling.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
satireV Donating Member (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Is that how they did it in 1975? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-23-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Don't know for sure
but doubt it. This seems to be a new way that they figured to get around it altogether. Then it was a lose of 7 votes from 67 to 60 not a total overturn of the concept. This time it actually is giving the
WH control of the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC