|
and Johnny Appleseed was turned into a legend. If you want an environmentalist, you could pick Rachel Carson. Silent Spring alerted us to the danger of pesticides. Her impact was huge. With George Washington any little quirks have been worn away by history.
You are then comparing Washington to men whose entire life becomes an open book. No one can always be perfect. Only when there is an effort to look at them through a soft lens could any politician come close to George Washington.
The RW has done a better job with this lately than we have, They have completely ignored all of the damage done by Reagan's economic policies and ignored that, although the USSR was beginning to self destruct during his time, the seeds of many of today's international disasters were planted by his administration. To them Reagan is a bigger than life hero. They even have, to their base, turned GWB into a bigger than life hero.
Last year, if we controlled much of the media, Kerry would have been an easy candidate to mythologize - he was a war hero, but one concerned with the safety of his men and who was troubled by much of what he saw, he then spoke truth to the government on this, while urging people to stay within the system to change things. Continue through his accomplishments as Prosecutor, LT GOV, and Senator. The fact is he is a very clean politician who has often fought unpopular battles, usually in an impeccable, intelligent and tenacious manner.
The bare bones of his life could support bigger than life or hero descriptions and it would have taken less effort than the RW needed for Reagan. Instead, the LW and the RW both examined his life and record under a microscope - many with the intent of ignoring (or diminishing the importance of) anything good he may have done, while focusing on what they disliked. Both sides did find things they didn't like.
If you compare people to myths and legends none of them will be good enough. Even when you compare Presidential hopefuls to past Presidents, it is hard to see their potential. I think that we will be better served in 2008, if we don't diminish a good candidate for not being perfect. Every candidate who seemed to have a chance last year, Dean, Edwards, Clark, Gephart, and Kerry were all better men, more intelligent and more likely to lead our country out of this mess than W was. None of them were perfect, but all of them were sincere, capable people without any fatal flaws.
In 2008, we need to attempt to see the good in all the candidates and take the best. Then we need to not reject good while looking for perfect.
|