Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Kerry's health an issue? Should it be an issue?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:40 PM
Original message
Is Kerry's health an issue? Should it be an issue?
I know Kerry had surgery for his prostate cancer, but is it possible he's having a bit of a relapse? I heard a comments from alot of people who think he looks pale, wan, and is very thin.

If he's sick and knows it he should drop out for the sake of his health and because we really shouldn't have a candidate with major health issues. If he gets bad in October we'd be in trouble.

I don't mean this as an attack of any sorts, but I truly believe it is an issue and alot people I've been around have noted his less than stellar health appearance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is 4 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely it's an issue!
It was an issue with Tsongas in '92 and rightly so! History bore out that Tsongas should not have been elected and he didn't even look ill during the primaries!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. not his prostate cancer
it's so common, I don't think it will even have a psychological effect with voters.

People realize no president is guaranteed to live forever, and that a risk of a relapse is not enough to rule anyone out.

Plus, Kerry projects probably the best health of any of the candidates, except possibly Kucinich due to his diet.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. No more than Dean's mental health
nice try
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XanaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thank you for writing that
I was just going to. No, I think a candidate's physical health (look at FDR) is less important than their mental health.

If anything, I noticed people at Kerry's meeting last night saying that THEY had relatives with the same cancer, and that it made them feel like he is one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Dean does not have mental health problems and you know it.
I was being polite above, you should try being polite for a day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Then he certainly
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 02:23 PM by Nicholas_J
Has problems with controlling his actions behavior and his tongue.

According to the Burlington Free Press, he also seems to have problems with facts and seems somewhat truth impaired, as his need to apologize to a number of candidates for mis-statements about their records and stances certainly indicates:

From earlier in the campaign:

Dean bites Democrats



Although sometimes loose with the truth, Dean's attack strategy seems to have paid off. He has put his opponents on the defensive and has drawn considerable attention from political commentators and Democratic contributors. Polls show him neck and neck with Kerry in the critical New Hampshire primary and closing in on the favored Gephardt in the Iowa caucuses.


As Dean becomes a top-tier candidate, however, his casual approach to facts and abusive tactics against his opponents could get him into serious trouble -- and severely damage Vermont's reputation for political civility and intellectual honesty.

Or How About:

Edwards was referring to the speech Dean delivered to California Democrats last weekend, in which he stood at the podium at the party's annual convention in Sacramento and lambasted Edwards and Kerry by name for supporting the war. Dean, who has won a following with his antiwar pronouncements, sought to distinguish himself further by telling the delegates that both of his rivals had refused to stand by their position during their speeches to the crowd. The remark triggered cheers for Dean - even though he would later acknowledge it was wasn't true.

http://www.topdog04.com/000071.html

Here Dean himself admits he has lied about Edwards in order to get support. He lies in public, but apologizes in private, by letter or some other format. Still he has lied in order to sway voters.



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Cute hijack attempt.
Not even really a reputable source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. A repost of an article
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 02:23 PM by Nicholas_J
From the Burlington Free Press is certainly a valid source, as well a reposts from the Des Moines Register.

Sorry, Dean has flagrantly prevaricated during this campaign, and it finally caught up to him In Iowa. His behavior a candidate has even exceeded Nixon's "I am not a crook line"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. Not in my nature
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 05:16 PM by mitchum
see Marcus Aurelius

And you should try being a little more subtle and/or skillful for a day. But I must say that your concern for Kerry's health is touching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intheozone Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Dean's mental health is just fine!
Even if he were angry, which he is not, there is a hell of a lot to be angry about!! You must have heard the saying by now "if you're not outraged, you're not paying attention!"
There are a hell of a lot of us paying attention and yes, IT IS OUTRAGEOUS what is happening to this country under this administration! Every democratic candidate should be shouting this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
33. No one in this thread is claiming Dean is Mentally Ill
just pointing out the absurdity of this cancer nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. Thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cheezus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. People watch the West Wing too much
He had prostate cancer, they caught it early, and it's gone. He was just talking about it at the town hall meeting, using it to show the disparity in health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Namvet04 Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. No, but clark not being able to cook pancakes in NH
Could be far greater.

Men get over this all the time. It is nothing major anymore if caught in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's common; it should not be an issue --
but count on the Bush campaign to spread rumors if Kerry's the nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flaminbats Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. It is an issue, and one people will think of every time they see him!
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 01:55 PM by flaminbats
The real question is how long ago did he get cancer, and how frequently in the cases of prostate cancer..does it come back?

One relative of mind was watching him in a debate, and she said "that guy just doesn't look well to me!"

When I told her about his fight with prostate cancer, she asked "well why is he even running then?"

Considering that I'm still undecided, I still consider this an issue which must be addressed to win my vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Perhaps health should be an issue -- for all the candidates.
But after Dick "I've-had-a-zillion-bypasses" Cheney, now running as "The man with electro-shock paddles in his Chest", I don't see health ever being an issue again, unless the candidate dies while giving a speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuctapeFatwa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Cheney is on life support. Is Kerry worse off than that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. There's a different in the public mind btwn Pres and VP.
Guess which one get's more focus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justinpower Donating Member (132 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Still though
If we can have the undead in office, i dont think a minor cancer is an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I never knew prostate cancer was minor. No matter how severe.
Thank you.

:eyes:

Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. rarely metastacises
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 02:27 PM by Nicholas_J
And is the slowest growing cancer known.

After the age of 65, it is rarely removed, as the person is likely to die of old age before it becomes a serious health problem.

After removal and resection it is rarely known to recur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
17. He's been campaigning with little sleep for the past few months.
And yes, having cancer surgery can take a lot out of you, sometimes literally. And he's never been a fat guy. So yes, he may appear less than 100% physically.

Kerry's cancer may have upped his risk of future growths, but if he were to win against Bush in November, he'd literally have access to the world's best doctors and medicine. Besides, he already has a pretty good health plan, and they caught and removed the growth early. His chances are still pretty good.

In any case, I don't think it should be a disqualifier. What he stands for could live beyond him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I surely hope my future employers don't decide whether to give me a job
and whether I'm healthy based on looks.

I trust Kerry and the other Democrats to make the judgment as to whether they are capable of doing the job physically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hellhathnofury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Has Kerry released any health records?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monte Carlo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Is that really necessary?
Unless he's been trafficking OxyContin with his maid during recent years, should he really have to release some very personal details, at this point in time? Dick Cheney has had a half-dozen heart attacks and he hasn't released anything. ANYTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. I saw him on Cspan this morning
And I have to say that he really DID look pretty "sickly", for lack of a better word. I didn't notice it as much in the debate, but I imagine they use makeup for those, which would hide the pale ashen look that I saw this morning. He really doesn't look well at all. He did recently lose his voice, but Dean has had that same issue and he isn't pale and ashen looking. So yes, I've been wondering about his health myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Isaw him too
He looked fine, but he he wasnt loaded up with heavy pancake make-up as Dean usually is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaraokeKarlton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. All candidates wear makeup for studio appearances and debates
But they don't wear it on the campaign trail. Kerry not only looks sickly pale, he also looks like he's lost about 20lbs. You can ignore it if you choose to, but the man just looks sick. If it were my candidate I would be concerned for his health, not denying he didn't look very well. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
22. A person is not considered a true "cancer survivor" until they have not
had a relapse for five years. I know because, I've had a son die of cancer.

To pretend that cancer will not be a part of this campaign is short-sighted and down right dangerous. Decisions need to be made intelligently.

Bush will use anything to win. He'll use lies when necessary, but when a truth - KERRY HAS HAD CANCER ONLY ABOUT A YEAR AGO - is laid right in his lap, we can only imagine the havoc, innuendos, rumors, etc, the Pubs will use to scare people from voting for Kerry.

And to be quite honest, Mr. Kerry or anybody else, doesn't KNOW if the cancer will reappear somewhere else in his body. I am sorry if this sounds harsh, but Bush will be even more cruel and harsh on this subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
24. the kind of cancer he had
generally doesn't kill when caught in time. Many people don't even get treatment for it due to how slow moving a cancer it is. I do have to say though, that releasing his health records may well be a good idea. Cancer is a scary word and as a person who worked on the Tsongas campaign I have to say these issues can snowball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. He Looked Sick In The Debate...Maybe Just Tired...But Should Be
throughly examined...Remember Bradley had a problem with an irregular heartbeat...

Incidentally, for those taking shots at Dean's mental health, if you don't stand up against the media's total unfair treatment of Dean regarding that speech, you are making a BIG mistake.

Your candidate's time is coming and we must all stand together against the whore media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
31. You can't get life insurance until you're in remission for over 5 years.
I remember people saying that he was really tired for several months after surgery. Now he's tired again which is probably a little understandable in this heated primary.

You've got to wonder though what his energy level is going to be like for the rest of the campaign.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
32. Giuliani thought it was - withdrew from senate race in 2000
And not for lack of ambition. Considering Tsongas as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Giuliani also was having a nasty divorce
I think that had something to do with it as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
35. No it shouldn't be an issue
It's time to take the cancer bogeyman scare off the table. We're all living longer, & most people are going to get a serious illness like cancer, or heart disease, etc.

However, be warned, if Kerry gets the nomination, it will be used against him by the Bush crew. They did it to McCain in 2000, who has had several skin cancer surgeries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loren645 Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. Agreed, it's one more thing for the Pugs to use against him
(Even though Cheney's death warmed over.)

But they all look exhausted, for obvious reasons.
Lack of sleep does that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
38. If it's not an issue in the primaries
I guarantee, it WILL be an issue in the GE. Count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. Seeing Kerry up close in Iowa shows how amazing it is...
...and how absolutely wrenching it must be to run for President.

Kerry's schedule was basically 18-20 hour days for what will be about 6 months straight. I'd imagine all the top-tier candidates are under this kind of ruthless schedule.

If you're the candidate, you have to be "on" all the time, doing speeches, shaking hands of thousands, driving, flying, being interviewed, trying to sleep, trying to maintain your voice and keeping up with whatever strategies are needed in the process.

From what I've seen of Kerry in Iowa (I was within a foot or two of him on several occasions), he's in good shape and in good spirits.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefta Dissenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
40. They all look more tired
even my candidate, General Handsome. I don't like to make assumptions based on Kerry's fatigued look any more than I liked it when someone made similar comments about Clark a week or so ago.

What IS the deal with medical exams? Do all of the candidates need to have a physical exam (with results made public) at some point, or do people only do that voluntarily if there's some issue that has been brought forth?

It seems to me that it would be good policy - perhaps after the nominee is selected - to have an exam made public. Pre-emptive strike against any rumors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
42. If it weakens a DEM, then it is an "issue" for the media...
I'm sure the media will talk about that more than Bush's WMD lies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC