Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

HELP: HILLARY CLINTON 2008!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
CrazyRP Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 04:58 PM
Original message
HELP: HILLARY CLINTON 2008!
(BTW...Some of you might remember me from my several thousand posts as rpf113. I'm waiting for my password.)

Now I am hoping as much as anyone here that Bush gets his behind kicked in 2004, but I think it's time we start hedging our bets and getting a grassroots campaign giong for Hillary in 2008.

So I need volunteers! I need someone to make a 'Draft Hillary 2008' website. Let's get on Meetup.com.

HILLARY!
HILLARY!
HILLARY!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sorry, I cannot support that at this time
and probably could not support Hillary in 2008 regardless of the fact that I know my wife would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
absyntheNsugar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Me neither
She's pretty far to the right, and carries way too much political baggage to pull off a win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formernaderite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. I hated the Bush coronation...and certainly won't support a Clinton Two
Hillary is senator because she's the cuckolded wife of one of America's favorite presidents. She votes out of one side of her mouth and talks lovey dovey to us out of the other. Everything is calculated for a run in the general election. Sorry, but I found it hard to take her seriously as a Senator, and would never vote for her in the primary. I hate political dynasties...I don't believe because you are related to a Kennedy or Bush anyone should vote for you. Democracy is supposed to be the voice of the populace...I'm frankly tired of this political nepotism, and stunned that the voters continue to support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why not wait till after the election?
Starting now would make it look like we think we'll lose.

What are Hillary's virtues as a candidate/President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oasis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. That's it. All we need to do now is to lock up this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mot78 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rrrright
If we do that, polling places on Election Day have be having record Republican turnouts. And why should she be drafted for 2008 when we haven't even had the 2004 election yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree it's way too early
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. I love Hillary and would vote for her in heartbeat
but I'm entriely focused on 2004. Sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary?
Let's not and say we did.

The only thing I admire abut Hillary is that she doesn't bake cookies but will pretend to when competing with Barbara Bush's false matronly image as a cookie-baker.

Hope Hillary isn't counting on my support because it won't be there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zinnola Donating Member (121 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. I agree Tinoire
Hillary is NOT who I want representing the DEM party ever. She is an opportunistic snake, whose positions are like her husbands.. she looks at the polls for what she should vote for, and is inauthentic as hell. Plus, if she ever got the nom, she is such a polarizing and despised figure by the Repugs that the Rep party wouldn't have to raise a dime to get them to vote againist her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Uh huh. Yep. We are whatever the media says we are, right?
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 05:31 PM by Dr Fate
The media loves to talk about "Hillary", so I guess that means actual DEMS cant get enough of her- right?

Just because Fox, Rush, Drudge and Newsmax cant give up the Hillary thing does not make it a reality with actual DEMS.

Please, keep on thinking that DEMS are what the media says we are. It will make it easier for us to suprise & confuse our enemies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. The democrat is going to
win so she will have to wait until 2012. I will support her then. We are going to win folks be positive and work like heck. Help our Dem. senators and reps also. Take back our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
25. but all of us liberals get our "marching orders" from Bill & Hillary
I know it's true, the tv says so! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. She may miss her chance if she doesn't accept a VeeP slot.
When Clark gets elected he will be in for 8 years and then it will be too late for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Not too late for Hillary
She can go for re-election in NY, which she should win easily, giving her 12 years cred for the presidential run in 2012.

I'd bet that's the real Clinton plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldian159 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. If Rudy runs in 2006
she might not win so easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hillary voted for IWR and PATRIOT
and she went to Israel and refused to meet with any Palestinian leaders or representatives, unlike Joe Lieberman who did.

Lucky for you that Hillary is not running this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INTELBYTES Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hillary? No thank you.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. I don't want Hillary now and I don't think I want her then.
It is fun to watch all the freeper heads explode, but other than that I'm not interested. Besides that, I plan on winning this election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Hedge your own bet.
Hillary can do a second NY Senate term, and be tanned, rested, and ready for 2012.

That's the Clinton plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no name no slogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. No bleeping way
Hilary is a symptom of what's WRONG with this party.

We don't need another Corporocratic president. Slick Willy did enough damage to this party in a scant eight years to last us a lifetime. He's made us all be irrelevant to blue-collar workers, who were once one of our core demographic.

IF indeed she is drafted in 2008, I will work my ass off to keep her from the nomination. One Clinton presidency every century is one too many.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Never!!
Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never
Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never Never
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
INTELBYTES Donating Member (881 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. So, whada ya think John Locke?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Is that a joke?
Edited on Sat Jan-24-04 07:59 PM by JohnLocke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. The GOP wants to face Hillary even more than they do Dean
which is a whole lot

She'd be a landslide loser in all probability, we can do much better for the first female nominee. Mary Landrieu, Dianne Feinstein etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. A Hillary candidacy would bring unmatched Republican turnout
Most Americans like her, but the Republicans would be out in full force like we will be this November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. why?
why would we want to draft her, and why would she need to be drafted, why wouldn't she run on her own?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
22. Hillary Won't Run Against President EDWARDS!
YEOW! He's my dream Prez....tell Hillary to help HIM!

And HELLO -- 2004 comes before 2008!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnLocke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #22
39. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. Hillary supports the war in Iraq
and she's way too centrist. Might as well vote for Daschle while we're at it.

If it's true Al Gore was looking for a new base with his Moveon speeches and Dean support to make another run, than it worked. I'd be supporting him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
27. your timing is about as
sensible as bush wanting to go to mars in this economic climate!! Makes we wonder if your post isn't an opposition plant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
29. News alert!
This is 2004. We have an election to win NOW. If we win, I think we would be best to support the guy in office in 2008 over Hillary. Dontchathink?

You're hitting this way too soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyRP Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
31. You're right....
in a sense. We shouldn't undermine this election and I am determined to win. (A Poll today showed Kerry beating Bush by 2%, very encouraging.)

But, god forbid, we don't win I think we need a superstar candidate to devastate the 2008 or 2012 Republicans and think that we need to get the wheels moving on this bus as soon as possible.

I don't know if you guys have been following her, but she has become the practical head of the Democratic Party. She still beats all of the other candidates when polled. So if she can beat John Kerry in a heartbeat, and Kerry can beat Bush, the Hillary should be able to take him on, or any of his neoconservative allies.

(BTW...Some of you might remember me from my several thousand posts as rpf113. I'm waiting for my password.)

Now I'd appreciate it if people didn't post anymore negative opinions on this thread. I can't believe the venom Democrats have for Hillary. You sound exactly like Rush Limbaugh, and that's pathetic. Hillary is a good, honest woman, a shrewd politician and a sure winner in 2008 or 2012. She is immensely popular.


SO IF ANY OF YOU WOULD LIKE TO JOIN ME ON STARTING A DRAFT HILLARY WEBSITE WHICH WE WILL DEBUT AFTER THE 2004 ELECTION, SHOULD BUSH WIN, PLEASE LET ME KNOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. "she has become the practical head of the Democratic Party"
that's news to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. "Now I'd appreciate it . . ."
". . . if people didn't post anymore negative opinions on this thread."

LOL!! Wait, let me pick myself up off of the floor.

Also, I'd like everyone to stop blinking for about an hour.

Just as realistic. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Namvet04 Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. We do not need this nonsense at this time and she does not want it
We need to focus like a laser beam on this election.

Hillary can get in the back of the line behind the next president if from our party, or of we do not win, gets at the back behind experience people like Kerry, Dean, Edwards, Clark, Gore, DK, Al, Carol and then she can start at the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. I'll pass until 2007.
There are a LOT of good Democrats 'in the wings', my own state's Governor among them, who may decide to have a go at it in 2008. Until that picture starts to come together, I won't decide or be a party to 'freezing anyone out'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipepeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
35. I agree with others here
That this is silly when we haven't even had the 2004 elections yet. We should be focusing all of our energy on getting Bush out this year.

And Hillary is too centrist for me anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
40. Sorry, No
that'd be a disaster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frustrated_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. No, not at this time
Sorry, that seems to support the idea that we're going to lose in 2004. We're not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
42. Hillary won't even get my vote in 2012 now
Not after she gave Junior a standing ovation when he LIED about his invasion of Iraq "making America safer".

And in 2008, I'll be supporting President Dean's re-election anyway :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
43. Why are you assuming
that a Dem will not be running for reelection?

Forget about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
44. So, are you even bothering to work in this election?
How about making 2004 happen instead of sitting about for four years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VirginiaIs4Lieberman Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
45. Something scares me
about Hillary in charge of the military and numerous WMDs. I honestly think she is evil. I'd hate to say it, but I'd rather have Bu$h.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #45
46. You would rather have a drug and booze addled deserter? OK n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VirginiaIs4Lieberman Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. It's a close call
but I don't know about a power-hungry anti-semitic liar either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
47. No thanks...bad idea
Hillary should stick to trying to be a Senator. We don't need the pain of her candidacy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
49. No, thank you.
When 2008 arrives, IF I believe that Sen. Clinton is the best candidate for POTUS our party has to offer, I will support her. Until then, I'll leave the mental masturbation to others, and concentrate on getting HD the nod, and the WH. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
50. Not right now
If I was to think about 2008 at all, it would be about re-electing the Democratic president that uprooted the Shrub back in '04. That's got to be the whole focus of every Democrat. And, if we should not prevail this year, and if there are still free elections in 2008, who knows who'll be looking good by then. Might be one of these guys..might be someone we're not even thinking about yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
51. Too many negatives
I think that she is a wonderful planner and visualizer of policy but she has too many negatives - like Howard Dean now.

I hope that she will have a place in a cabinet as a senior adviser and this time, on her own account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-24-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
52. locked
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC