Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Jackson verdict will obliterate any bad news Bush wants to unload

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 01:26 PM
Original message
The Jackson verdict will obliterate any bad news Bush wants to unload
Normally, the bad news dump day is Friday afternoon when the networks have already set their evening newscasts in stone and the weekend makes it old news by Monday.

But now -- Get ready for the mother of all bad news dumps.

The perfect time to announce bad news and have it completely ignored by the media is almost upon us -- the Michael Jackson verdict.

Bush could announce that, yes, he really did snort coke off the backside of a hooker in Tijuana while he was supposed to be serving in the Guard -- and the media wouldn't notice for at least a week.

So what news will the Bush junta unload this time?

http://www.salon.com/ent/col/fix/2005/06/03/fri/

Both sides in the Michael Jackson trial gave their closing arguments on Thursday, each painting a different portrait of the man the jury is set to judge -- and the family accusing him of molestation. "Michael Jackson molested and many other boys," Deputy District Attorney Ron Zonen told the jury, adding that, while the boys whooped it up at Neverland during the day, "At night, they entered into Michael Jackson's bedroom, which is a veritable fortress. They entered into the world of the forbidden they learned about human sexuality with someone who was only too willing to be their teacher." Zonen illustrated his claim with projected images of girlie magazines and other items found in Jackson's home. Defense attorney Thomas Mesereau responded by branding his client's accusers "con artists" and "actors" whose case is based on "lies, innuendo and exaggeration." "This case makes no sense," Mesereau told the jury. Deliberations are expected to begin on Friday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uh oh, you're right and with Kerry planning on bringing up the Downing
Street Minutes on Monday, I'd say a verdict will give a week's worth of cover to any/all reasons to cover real news. Hang in there John, the Jackson Distraction WILL fade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. We should Googlebomb DSM with "jackson verdict"
Next week will be a big test of the media. We have the power to fuck them if they decide to go with MJ 24/7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Only temporarily, and only if we allow it.
VIGILANCE!!!

CONTACT YOUR REPS!!!!

WRITE TO YOUR LOCAL MEDIA!!!!!

SIGN JOHN CONYERS' LETTER!!!!

VISUALIZE IMPEACHMENT!!!!!!!!!

Sorry to yell, but I can't help it with these...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. If they did notice -
I'm sure they would very quickly issue a retraction and apology to the Bushmeister. Where do they think they are, anyway - America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karenina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Angry citizens
would do well to turn out en masse, surround the media trucks around the courthouse and SCREAM THEIR HEADS OFF about what they would like to see covered instead. As long as the *corp media is able to conduct bidness as usual with impunity and unimpeded, NOTHING WILL CHANGE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-03-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. How true... Even CNN.com has it's priorities messed up!
Edited on Fri Jun-03-05 04:03 PM by calipendence
Check out this screengrab I just took from the bottom of a news page. Where are our priorities people?

Page: http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/06/03/human.traffic/index.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC