Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Since abortions are restricted in the states in 3rd tri. does "choice"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:34 PM
Original message
Since abortions are restricted in the states in 3rd tri. does "choice"
not exist in the 3rd trimester?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I supose there is informed consent even in medical cases
Edited on Tue Jun-07-05 02:36 PM by usregimechange
but is that considered "choice?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. yes, and that's where the choice comes in
Third trimester abortions are extremely rare and done only for the most tragic of circumstances. Every attempt is made to preserve the life of a statistically viable fetus. Only when the health of the mother is so precarious that she is unable to survive either induced labor or a c-section is a D&X of a viable fetus considered. The rest of the cases involve deformities that would not allow the survival of the fetus much past birth, such as anencephaly detected late in pregnancy.

These things should always be decided by the woman in question and her doctor. Women don't get third trimester abortions so they can fit into their swimsuits on a cruise. They do it for the most tragic of reasons and because there is no other real choice except injury or death.

Politicians and preachers have no business making medical decisions for people they don't know, not now, not ever. The decision making process falls squarely upon the people involved. Preachers may be consulted for pastoral care, but that's where their input should be.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for this thread. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orangepeel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Federally, no. It does not.
Roe v. Wade allows states to prohibit abortion in (roughly) the third trimester, as long as provisions are made to protect the life of the woman.

There may be some states that allow unrestricted choice in the third trimester, but I don't know if there are or what they are. But, Federally, choice does not exist in the 3rd trimester.

That's what angers me the most about people who want to "compromise" on reproductive rights. Roe v. Wade is already a compromise along the lines of what most Americans say they think ought to be the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Casey is the case here not Roe
Casey v. Planned Parenthood. O'Conner sets all kind of weird tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourStarDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Choice doesn't exist in the 3rd trimester except in a medical emergency
Although a lot of freepers try to ignorantly argue otherwise..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Exactly -
- and even in the case of a medical emergency, the choice should be to deliver a pre-term baby vs. continuing the pregnancy as babies without birth defect or disease are easily viable by 6 months gestation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. I certainly hope 6 months is long enough for people to choose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC