genius
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 07:30 PM
Original message |
Dean's statement is technically inaccurate |
|
The Republicans (including Franklin Graham and Pat Robertson and all their other ministers)are opposed to everything for which Christ stood. Therefore the terms anti-Christian or Anti-Christ are technically more accurate.
So, I would suggest that next time he refer to the GOP as the party of the White Anti-Christs.
|
goclark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 07:31 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I prefer " party controlled by the Anti Christ Right" nt |
Clarkie1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 07:32 PM by Clarkie1
"The Christian Wrong."
The problem with Dean's statement is he used the term "Christian" with no qualifier. He didn't frame the issue or the term.
|
Old and In the Way
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 07:38 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I'd suggest calling them 3W Fristians |
|
White - War-mongering - War-profiteering Fake Christians.
|
The_Casual_Observer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Pat Robertson etc. have made personal fortunes exploiting the |
|
the name of Jesus. bush was reelected in part by exploiting the name of Jesus. It is the oldest con in the book.
|
Psephos
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-08-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |
5. They're not AntiChrists, they're pseudoChristians |
|
Big difference, not the least of which is that pseudoChristians are hypocrites, while the AntiChrist is not. In that sense, they are worse.
Peace.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message |