Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What the filibuster deal gave us

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 07:58 PM
Original message
What the filibuster deal gave us
This is Pryor. Because of the filibuster deal, he is no longer being filibustered and a cloture motion passed today guaranteeing Pryor the job. Before the deal, we had the 41 plus votes to stop him. This is why we need new leadership in the Senate.

The following is from http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oId=18867


Consider the record:


Congressional Authority: Pryor has advocated an extreme federalist view that would severely limit Congress’s ability to protect fundamental individual rights and liberties. For example, Pryor proudly supported a Supreme Court ruling that declared the Violence Against Women Act’s federal remedy for victims of sexual assault and violence unconstitutional.

Church and State: Pryor has repeatedly blurred the line between church and state. He was a fervent supporter of Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore’s crusade to install the Ten Commandments in the state judicial building. He later distanced himself when Moore refused to obey a specific federal court order.

Criminal Justice: Pryor unsuccessfully defended Alabama’s practice of handcuffing prisoners to a hitching post under the hot sun if they refused to work on chain gangs. Pryor defended the constitutionality of this act, saying it did not constitute “cruel and unusual punishment.” The Supreme Court rejected Pryor’s argument and struck down the practice.

Civil Rights: Pryor has undermined landmark civil rights legislation. He urged the Supreme Court to hold that a disabled state employee who has been discriminated against in the workplace cannot sue the state for damages under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Additionally, he lobbied for modifications to the Voting Rights Act that would remove the requirement that the Justice Department review some voting procedure changes to ensure that they are not discriminatory.

Gay Rights: Pryor has consistently attempted to eny gays and lesbians equal protection of the laws. Pryor wrote a brief to the Supreme Court supporting a Texas law that criminalized private, consensual sexual conduct between same-sex adults. The Supreme Court later overturned this law in Lawrence vs. Texas. Additionally, Pryor upheld Florida’s adoption law that prohibits gay men and lesbians from adopting children, even when they have served as foster parents of the children.

Reproductive Rights: Pryor is a staunch opponent of reproductive rights. He has called Roe v. Wade “the worst abomination of constitutional law in our history” and defended a so-called “partial birth abortion” ban in Alabama, even though it lacked the constitutionally-required exception to protect the health of the woman.


Check out the PFAW site. There's more bad news on all of the above issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Democrats should just walk out and shut the Senate down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, that worked well for the repugs in '95 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTLawGuy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. they didnt have a good REASON to do it
and besides how soon after that did Dems take back the Congress?

That's what I thought...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Dems made good sized gains in 98 and 2000. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It wasn't about Congress, it was about Clinton
Clinton was the clear winner in that tussle - in fact, it was one of his most powerful comebacks. Wiped his whole healthcare fiasco slate clean.

Remember, the public doesn't follow the nuances. They pick a winner and a loser.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. For one thing, that strategy worked great for Newt and Co.
And second, Senate Dems cannot prevent a quorum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am thoroughtly disgusted and nauseated about all this.
Why even bother? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, that deal just handed * everything he wanted.
Anyone who thought at the time this was somehow a good deal for us probably also believes everything else Limpballs says too.

On the upside, the whole thing's coming down soon, at which time the fascists AND their enablers will be nothing but a nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Best of all, the traitors can do it again next year.
Play the Dems like a violin.

All working to their plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. And without the deal
He still would have been confirmed, and we wouldn't have a fighting chance of stopping any future nominees.

What's your suggestion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Actually the Dems held firm on the filibuster of Pryor until the deql
Edited on Wed Jun-08-05 08:13 PM by genius
The nuclear option would have destroyed the Republican Party. The public was adamently aginst it and the Republicans didn't have the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. "Destroyed the Republican Party??"
The public barely understands the filibuster, let alone the nuclear option. It would have been forgotten about by 2006.

The Republicans clearly had the votes as well. Graham and DeWine indicated they would support Frist if no compromise could be reached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. On your first case
What was your opinion of yesterday's ruling regarding medical marijuana?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC