Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House panel again tells agencies: Increase telework or lose funds

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 04:37 PM
Original message
House panel again tells agencies: Increase telework or lose funds
House panel again tells agencies: Increase telework or lose funds

By Daniel Pulliam
dpulliam@govexec.com

Congressional appropriators are intensifying efforts to allow federal employees the opportunity to work away from their offices.

Language in a spending bill approved by the House Appropriations Committee this week requires five agencies to prove that the number of teleworkers in their agency is increasing or give up $5 million in funding. The measure is sponsored by Rep. Frank Wolf, R-Va., and according to his office, the measure will go to the full House on Tuesday.

Wolf said in a statement that he regrets "having to be so heavy handed" by threatening to withhold funding, but he believes that it is necessary in order to increase the number of federal employees allowed to telework.

"The federal government should be leading the way when it comes to teleworking, instead of being pushed into it," Wolf said. "There simply is just no magic in strapping ourselves in a metal box every day and driving ourselves to the office only to sit behind a computer or talk on the phone for eight hours."

http://govexec.com/dailyfed/0605/061005p1.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Telecommuting is union busting
Telecommuting is a huge anti-union tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. They hate to let the workers out from under the corporate thumb!
Even when it is a perfect solution to the commuting issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've done both, and I hate Telework.
It feels like not having a job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ex-governor Jerry "Moonbeam" Brown was 25-30 yrs ahead of his time
I believe he suggested back in the 70s or 80s that businesses hold teleconferences to cut down on commuting/smog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. Preview of peak oil?
Ask yourself...what if gasoline goes to $6 per gallon - as it is in Europe presently? What about $10 per gallon?

Maybe telework is an idea that needs to be considered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-11-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. With my job
I could do almost all of it from home, and often once a week I will work from home. With the new IP phones we are getting my office phone will ring though my PC no matter where I am.

Since I drive about 40 miles total a day for work I could save 200 per week or 10,400 miles a year (over 400 gallon of gas). That does not include gas wasted when traffic is real bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC