Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Downing St. Memo : Part #2 ???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:45 PM
Original message
Downing St. Memo : Part #2 ???
Sorry if this was posted..


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/150605chroniclecovers.htm

Is it a second Downing Street Memo -- or something even more damning for both the Bush administration and the government of British Prime Minister Tony Blair?

On May 1, Britain's Sunday Times broke the story of the now-infamous Downing Street Memo; that document, the minutes of a meeting of Blair's top advisers, showed that the prime minister had known, some eight months before the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq, that a war not authorized by the United Nations would be illegal for British troops to take part in. Now The Times has scooped its rivals again with the news -- and the text of -- a leaked, extremely secret British Cabinet Office briefing paper dated July 23, 2002. Prepared for Blair and his closest advisers, this newly discovered document clearly states that "since regime change was illegal, it was 'necessary to create the conditions' which would make it legal."

Of Bush and Blair's rush to war, Margolis writes, "And so it went. Lie after lie. Scare upon scare. Fakery after fakery, trumpeted by the tame media that came to resemble the lickspittle press of the old Soviet Union. Ironically, in the end, horrid Saddam Hussein turned out to be telling the truth all along , while Bush and Blair were not."
Margolis offers a conclusion that, so far, no major news sources in the United States has dared utter. The Downing Street Memo, he notes, "would have forced any of Europe's democratic governments to resign in disgrace. But not Bush and Blair. Far from it." He also chastises American news corporations for failing -- or refusing -- to investigate what appeared to news watchers in other countries to be a vitally important story linked to the war."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. I heard there are 7 more documents!
I heard it on CNN last night I think. I'll see what I can find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the controllers
evil is sometimes eclipsed by their arrogance

the chimp NAZI salute!


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/150605bus...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Check the attached link. It's got links to 7 more documents.
http://www.democrats.com/node/4989

It's also supposed to be on RawStory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. good score!!
got any more??

'as long as I am dictator"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Did you see there were 8 separate links there?
Each one is a different memo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. wow
goin fast here''listening to anti-govt interview and reading stories..
will read up soonest
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. The minutes I want to see would be from the meeting(s)
where they discussed Saddam's frantic efforts to stop the impending war by giving the U.S. and U.K. anything and everything they wanted, i.e. access, records, more inspectors, etc.

I want to see the notes where they agreed that they had to stop talking to him because Bush wanted the back channel talks to cease before Saddam offered to step down.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well Andrea Mitchell on MSNBC this morning said
about DSM

You would have had to be brain dead not to know what the president was up too.






:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbeach Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. love that quote .its a keeper!
ole andrea reporting from the pinnacles of Hades!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I thought she said one would have to be blind not to see what
Bush was up to. Her remark totally infuriated me. If that's true then why wasn't the press screaming to the people and Congress before they voted on giving him any authority??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I think I heard her say that also but she did say brain dead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC