Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain was trailing Bush in Polls then won 48% to 30% over Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:55 AM
Original message
McCain was trailing Bush in Polls then won 48% to 30% over Bush
In New Hampshire. What can we gather from this? It seems like the Independents are a wild card. Could Kerry still loose to someone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Loren645 Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. And he wasn't supposed to win. The annointed one was supposed to win.
So they smeared him away.

What I gather from this is that the "polls" are propping up
another annointed one, a candidate that doesn't scare them
as much 'cause he's an insider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baby_bear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know, but it's interesting to think about
...what if McCain had prevailed over Bush?

Well, I guess we do know. We would be discussing President Gore right now. But even if we had been discussing a President McCain, it would have been a different world than what PNCAC has given us.
The PNACers were going to deliver GWBush regardless of democratic obstacles or cost. That was clear way back in 1998.

McCain was the unexpected and had to be dealt with swiftly and harshly. Most of the Republic never did hear what happened to him at the hands of the Conservative Right Wing Christians, (so self-described) in South Carolina.

s_m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. this is why NH polls are notorious for being wrong
in primary elections because independents can vote in either parties primary and so no one knows for sure what percentage of the vote they will make up in the primary. You can be sure they will vote in much heavier numbers in the Democratic primary since Bush is unopposed. I think we will have a much closer election on Tuesday than some of the polls indicate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
isbister Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm no big fan of "Keating Five" McCain
but, boy, do I sure wish he won the republican nomination
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleDannySlowhorse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I can't argue with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. I don't
If McCain had been nominated in 2000, Gore might have actually lost the election for real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wrong
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 02:13 AM by jsw_81
The final polls in New Hampshire four years ago had McCain leading Bush by a narrow margin. The big surprise wasn't that McCain won, but that he trounced Bush by nearly twenty points.

It's possible that Kerry could lose New Hampshire this time, but since every single poll shows him beating Dean, I think it's unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Corrrect
The best way to use polls is to look at all of them and see what they all say, If a candidate is in the lead beyond the margin of erro in all of them, it is a sure thing that they are really in the lead. If they exceed a candidate by multiples of the MoE in most of them, it is a dead certtainty that those polls are extremly accurate.

Kerry is ahead of Dean by multiples of the MoE in all but one poll, and is at least 50 percent above the MoE in the one poll that isnt multiple. The only sure thing you can say about Dean is that he is struggling for second place with Clark, and now Edwards is moving in to compete for second with them.

Given that in only one poll has Dean ganed a single point and in another stayes at the same level as the day before, i looks like it is extrememly likely that Kerry will win the New Hampsire primary, and that there is only a small likelihood that Dean will go up a point or two more by tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Nope
McCaine was so far ahead of Bush that the Economist was predicting that the race would be between John McCain and Bill Bradley at the end of December 1999 and in Early January of 2000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
9. Don't forget Gore-Bradley in NH 2000, either.
New Hampshire polls are notoriously volatile. The polls predicted Gore would blow Bradley out of the water, by a 10 to 15 point margin, but Bradley closed late, and emerged in 2nd to a 4-point finish behind Gore.

The result so surprised pollsters and voters alike, that Bradley never conceded anything, even though he had lost.

Bradley, of course, did not go on to win the nomination; nor did McCain. But it does point to the conventional wisdom that anything can happen in New Hampshire.

More here:

Primary Monitor: Bradley sees success in day's narrow defeat

Excerpt:

Conceding nothing, Bill Bradley said last night his ability to squeeze the gap on Al Gore is a victory over politics as usual, and proves he's ready to give the vice president a serious run in their cross-country rush to the Democratic convention.

"We have made a remarkable turnaround, but there is still a tough fight ahead," said Bradley, who was nearly drowned out by a wild, cheering crowd at New Hampshire College.

With late results showing him within four points of Gore, Bradley interpreted the result as win, noting how his campaign overcame a smaller war chest and near anonymity last spring to almost topple a sitting vice president backed by the party establishment.

"One week ago, they said it wouldn't happen. But it's already happened!" Bradley said, referring to polls within the last week that showed him trailing Gore by 10 to 15 percent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWheelLegend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Since McCain is better than Bush, you're saying Kucinich will win?
eom

TWL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC