Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House rejects lawmakers' call for Iraq pullout

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:43 PM
Original message
White House rejects lawmakers' call for Iraq pullout
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&e=1&u=/nm/20050616/ts_nm/iraq_bush_dc

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Critics of the Iraq war proposed a congressional resolution on Thursday calling for a U.S. troop withdrawal in a reflection of growing American unease, a proposal swiftly rejected by the White House and the
Pentagon.

The resolution, backed by North Carolina Republican Rep. Walter Jones (news, bio, voting record) and Hawaii Democratic Rep. Neil Abercrombie (news, bio, voting record), calls for the Bush administration to develop a plan by the end of this year to pull out all American troops from Iraq and to begin the withdrawal by Oct. 1, 2006.

Bush spokesman Scott McClellan said setting a withdrawal date would send the wrong message to Iraqi insurgents. "This message would say to the terrorists: 'All you have to do is wait until that day when our troops leave and then you can start carrying out those attacks and just hold out."' he said.

The resolution is not expected to get far in the Republican-led Congress, which, though critical of aspects of the war, has supported the president's efforts. Moreover, both Democrats and Republicans have warned that setting a withdrawal date would embolden the insurgents.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. My response to White House: Fuck YOU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder why this isn't called a "bipartisan" resolution?
Odd the things that get called bipartisan and the things that don't qualify for that adjective. But I'm sure it has nothing to do with media bias, or Rush would have told me it did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. You better believe it! - until the flow of OIL is cntrolled and contained
Kida that are 16-17 now will eventually end up dying for operation freeedom, or WMD's or Saddam was a "bad guy" -- this is lunacy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RalphReedsWreckedEm Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. White House Rejects Call for Sanity and Reality
Bush spokesman Scott McClellan said setting a basic standard of reality would send the wrong message to American idiots . "This message would say to the American suckers: 'All you have to do is wait until that day when our lies stop and then you can start understanding the truth and just vote Democratic."' he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. More conflation-
...Scott McClellan said setting a withdrawal date would send the wrong message to Iraqi insurgents. "This message would say to the terrorists: 'All you have to do is wait until that day when our troops leave and then you can start carrying out those attacks and just hold out."' he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC