Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is the legality of recess appointments?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 09:03 PM
Original message
What is the legality of recess appointments?
The way that I read the Constitution, recess appointments are allowed for vacancies that occur when Congress is not in session. This makes a lot of sense, because it allows the President to overcome a vacancy that may occur because of a death or incapacitation or resignation, without having to wait for Congress to return. I don't believe that it should be used to fill positions that were already vacant when Congress was still in session. I know that both Republicans and Democrats have used recess appointments, but I do not believe that the way they are used is what the Founding Fathers intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-16-05 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree--posted the same thing earlier under the Bolton thread.
Edited on Thu Jun-16-05 09:33 PM by ncteechur
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. IIRC Ted Kennedy sued when Bush recess appointed Pryor
and the court opted not to hear the case.

Democrats then threatened to filibuster all of Bush's judicial nominees unless he promised not to use his recess appointment power again. They agreed, and many judges were allowed to be confirmed.

However this deal was from the 108th Congress, and did not apply to executive nominees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's an explanation I found
http://slate.msn.com/id/1002994/

on the final day of a congressional recess, President Clinton appointed James Hormel ambassador to Luxembourg without Senate confirmation. The move prompted Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., to remark, " has shown contempt for Congress and the Constitution." Is Inhofe right?

Clinton's act was certainly constitutional. A recess appointment is one of the executive powers enumerated in the Constitution: "The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the end of their next Session" (II, 2, 3). The provision was originally created to fill vacancies that actually occurred during a recess, but it has since morphed into an all-purpose executive tool to counter Senate intransigence. President Kennedy, for instance, appointed Thurgood Marshall to the bench during a recess because he feared opposition from Southern senators. By the time Marshall's nomination came before the Senate, that resistance had been beaten back.

Presidents also use recess appointments to delay a confirmation vote until after an election, when the nominee possesses the advantage of incumbency and, ideally, faces a friendlier Congress. President Eisenhower appointed three justices during recesses: Earl Warren, William Brennan, and Potter Stewart. All three occurred immediately before an election, and all were confirmed the following spring by a new Congress.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC