Bush Is A Flaming Socialist And Here Are The Facts To Prove It

[BamaLefty]

Official data in support of Robert Sentry article "Surge Of Socialism Under George Bush"

All data from the official US Budget and the OMB (Office of Management and Budget):

A. "The average outlays spent on HR as a % of total outlays of the US budget averaged 61.26% 1993-2000 during Clinton's corrupt regime."

1993 to 2000--58.7, 59.5, 60.9, 61.4, 62.6, 62.5, 62.1, 62.4

B. "George Bush, who would be titled a "flaming socialist" by Republicans if his letter was a "D" not a "R", has averaged 65.53% (including estimates for 2003 and 2004)."

2001 to 2004--64.1, 65.5, 66.3, 66.2

C. "The average increase in total US spending outlays during Clinton's regime was 3.28% year over year. In the crucial category of HR, the largest hog in the US budget, the year over year increase in outlays averaged 4.71%."

3.28% averaged from (Trillions) --1.409489, 1.461877, 1.515802, 1.560535, 1.601250, 1.652585, 1.701891, 1.788773

and % -- 2.01, 3.71, 3.68, 2.95, 2.60, 3.20, 2.98, 5.10

4.71% averaged from (Trillions) -- .827533, .869410, .923765, .958232, 1.002336, 1.033426, 1.057717, 1.115481

and % -- 7.13, 5.06, 6.25, 3.73, 4.60, 3.10, 2.35, 5.46

D. "The average increase in total US spending during Bush's term (including estimates for 2003 and 2004) has been 5.67% year over year. In the HR category, Bush has slopped the hog at HR to the tune of 7.26% year over year increases."

5.67% averaged from (Trillions) -- 1.863895, 2.010975, 2.140377, 2.229425

and % -- 4.19, 7.89, 6.43, 4.16

7.26% averaged from (Trillions) -- 1.194409, 1.317852, 1.419648, 1.475076

and % -- 7.07, 10.33, 7.72, 3.90

E. "Human Resource spending (socialism) now consumes a whopping 66.2% of all government spending in the 2004 budget."

Note in the chart that in 1993, HR spending was less than 59% of total outlays. Considering this ugly and frightening rate of increase to 66 +%, and taking into account that we are just starting to feel the impact of the illegal alien welfare demands and the soaring birth rates of non-taxpayers, one has to wonder exactly how much the rate will be in ten years for HR.

The Defense Department is the only sizable function where sufficient dollars can be transferred to pay for this soaring socialism in the US budget.

Our enemies do not need to wage an arms war against us. They will soon be able to defeat us without bankrupting themselves by simply letting this trend of soaring socialism degrade our Defense Department to a degree of their liking.

F. "Compare that 17.5% figure to the Defense spending in 1993 at a much higher 20.7% rate."

In 1993, total outlays for Defense was 291.1 Billion dollars from total spending of 1.409 Trillion (20.7%).

In 2004, Defense is budgeted at 390.4 Billion from total spending of 2.229 Trillion, a decrease to the 17.5% figure.





http://www.sentryoveramerica.com/24_Surge_of_Socialism_Support_Data.htm

[KingFlorez]

1. Not really socialism

But the Republicans would call this that because they have not clue what socialism.

[dbeach]

3. I remember this also remember when trickie was outed..

nixon and regan were liberals and had morals compared to the busheviks...

[BamaLefty]

4. Exactly.

I thought the same thing. They're definition of socialism has been pushed on America though... so.... :-/

[dbeach]

2. socialist for the privleged..

rob from the poor and give to the rich


betya the wall st crash of 2000-2001 was no accident.

USA is owned by the insiders..the privleged elites who have conditioned us to worship the idols of money,fame,power,...

I lost $50,000 in mutual funds from 2000-2002

It is only a coincidence or did the insiders say ..enough cash for the middle ..time for the party to end.
And did it ever end!!

[WillyT]

5. Have You Guys Checked This Out !!!

Doak: Rich getting richer, thanks to American socialism

Link: http://www.desmoinesregister.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050613/OPINION01/506130303

:shrug:

[dbeach]

9. rob from the poor..give to the rich= amerikan socialism

I did see it But its worth a mini course

Big Muss or Mussilini summed it all up:'fascism is really corporatism=the merging of the corporate and state interests

What exactly is their interest?

Why to kill you..enslave you and continue their gang rape of planet earth...

Oh yes !!coming dear..gotta go take my red pil now..sorry


"Think about that. Tax money is being extracted from ordinary people and given to some of the wealthiest corporations around. Seed capital is coming not from private investors but from public coffers. If that's not socialism, it's a kissin' cousin.
Socialism for the CEOs. Capitalism for the workers.

When workers are laid off, they can expect 26 weeks of unemployment insurance. Then they are thrown into the cold, cruel marketplace to fend for themselves.

When CEOs run companies into the ground, they can expect golden parachutes that will leave them rich beyond the wildest dreams of ordinary mortals, able to live comfortably the rest of their lives.

Capitalism for the working stiffs. Socialism for the bosses."

[Kmarx]

6. Socialist, no

But a big asshole, yes!

[Just Me]

7. Bush advantages himself of different dominations than "you know who".

He advantages himself of religiosity, economic class and melting cultural identities.

This man and his administration have earned a mark above "you know who". They are ambitious ideologues facing an opposition greater than Ghandi,...a global opposition.

They are dark imperialists. What name do we bestow upon these tyrants?

I'd call them, "Vestige Imperialists". While they destroy so much, they are empty, will die empty. They have no quality of life. It's obvious.

[dbeach]

8. Very poignant with a touch of poetic!

I posted this and got zero responses

Bush uses self referral talking about Iran's suppressed liberty
Substitute the USA for Iran and its the Truth .

{So he is talking about himself..these contollers speak in double talk..bush ain't so stupid. I hear kerry and bush had similar grades at yale}

"'US President George W. Bush charged that Iran's upcoming presidential election "ignores the basic requirements of democracy" and accused Tehran of backing international terrorism.

"Today, Iran is ruled by men who suppress liberty at home and spread terror across the world. Power is in the hands of an unelected few who have retained power through an electoral process that ignores the basic requirements of democracy," Bush said "



http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20050616/pl_afp/iranvoteusb...

dbeach