Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

13 Dumbasses and their excuse for not co-sponsering anti-lynching legis.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 06:37 AM
Original message
13 Dumbasses and their excuse for not co-sponsering anti-lynching legis.
Well it's excuse from 11 dumbass - 2 didn't respond. You know, if 13 democratic senators gave these excuses for something along the same line, the press would have vilified them to death. But these repukes just don't get it - this was something long overdue with the history of lynching in this country. No, the bill wasn't going to make life altaring changes to the world. It was probably 2 minutes out of a senators life to say "Hey, it was wrong and we want to make amends for what should have been done decades ago"

So here are the excuses from the 13 Dumbasses

http://capitolbuzz.blogspot.com/2005/06/senators-who-refused-to-co-sponsor.html

Lamar Alexander (Tenn.) “I also condemn lynching. … But, rather than begin to catalog and apologize for all those times that some Americans have failed to reach our goals, I prefer to look ahead. I prefer to look to correct current injustices rather than to look to the past.”

Bob Bennett (Utah) “I come from a State that does not have a history of lynchings, but that does not mean I should be absolved from the concern that all Americans should have over the lynchings that have occurred. I note that it was the filibuster that made it possible for the Senate to be the body that blocked this legislation in the past. I would hope that in the future, we would all realize that the filibuster should be used for more beneficial purposes than that.”

Thad Cochran (Miss.) “I don’t feel I should apologize for the passage of or the failure to pass any legislation by the U.S. Senate. But I deplore and regret that lynchings occurred and that those committing them were not punished.”

John Cornyn (Texas) “There are different ways to acknowledge those times when Americans have failed to achieve the goals we have set for ourselves.”

Mike Enzi (Wyo.) “Sen. Enzi believes the lynchings that took place were tragic and that they never should have occurred. The legislation was passed by voice vote. Sen. Enzi agreed to that. He did not object.”

Judd Gregg (N.H.) “The fact that this amendment passed unanimously showed the depth of the support this resolution rightfully received, and Sen. Gregg was pleased to offer his support.”

Kay Bailey Hutchison (Texas) “You don’t have to co-sponsor everything that you are in favor of. She abhors lynching and thinks it is a horrific part of American history.”

Jon Kyl (Ariz.) No response.

Trent Lott (Miss.) No response.

Richard Shelby (Ala.) “There are many instances where Sen. Shelby supports legislation and resolutions without being a co-sponsor.”

Gordon Smith (Ore.) “Sen. Smith strongly supports the resolution. He has a long record protecting civil rights.”

John Sununu (N.H.) “Sen. Sununu supported the resolution, and was on the Senate floor Monday evening when the resolution passed unanimously by a voice vote.”

Craig Thomas (Wyo.) “The Senator was working on the energy bill and CAFTA when that came around. ... If it passed by unanimous consent, that means everyone supported it. I don’t see the news value.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. apparently the one dumbass DEM that voted for this
was one of those who didn't respond (Kent Conrad). :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I read where he signed on late
:shrug:

better late than never :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CottonBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-20-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Lynching was MORE than kidnapping and murder. That's why it was so evil.
Ordinary citizens actively participted in the lynchings. In my own community, lynchings occured as late as the 1940s and there is, to this day, still great racial hostility between white Anglo-Saxon protestants and blacks, Asians and North and Central American immigrants. Please read the book "Fire in a Canebreak" about the lynchings in Oconee/Walton Counties , GA in the 1940s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC