Bush's next 'terrorist' attack will be here soon

[Broken Acorn]

Ok everyone, make sure to get your duck tape and gas masks ready because we are definitely due for the next 'terra' event.


The * cabal has used up all its cards (and political capital) and the corporate media is now starting to at least acknowledge that they knew * was lying regarding the DSM.

Little Boot's approval ratings are in the toilet and all hell is breaking loose in the homeland.

1) Gitmo's ugly secrets (like how it is similar to a Nazi camp) are coming out
2) The American public disapproves of his handling of the war by over 60%
3) Our military can't come close to reaching its recruitment goals (don’t know why…)
4) Dean is calling out the Repubs as the white Christian party they are and the RW is going nuts over this
5) There are too many Whistle Blowers now to keep a lid on everyone (Rove’s head is spinning)
6) The WH environmental hacks have been exposed for compromising reports on global warming
7) Deep Throat nostalgia reminded journalists how they should be doing their jobs


It is time for another physc-ops terror attack similar to 9/11.

But what will it be and how soon will it come?

My bet is that we will be on the orange/red alert by next week.

[Sparkman]

1. Next big earthquake will be blamed on sci-fi WMD blasting of U.S. by IRAN!

The battleship MAIN's misplaced blame, the Tonkin Gulf Lie, the slant drilling/Kuwait historical ignorance, the contra Lies, Nixon's Cambodia bombing seeecreeet, the myriad of Pres. Weed's propaganda industry, it's endless ....
So what's next, alien invasion climate manipulation or natural disaster attributed to anyone who get's in the way of corporate amerika and their access to oil and resources.

[GreenPartyVoter]

2. LA or DisneyWorld. Chem weapons maybe. Probably not

bio weapons as that would be too hard to contain, I should think.

And yes, it is possible that it could happen on 9/11. Anything to milk that date a little more.

[nikraye]

18. Not Disney World -- Saudi Royal Family owns a big share of Disney

The Saudi royal family is a major investor in Disney so Disney World, Disneyland, and anything else under the Disney corporate umbrella is safe. The Saudi's investment was said to have been brokered by none other than the Poppy Bush-connected Carlyle Group, and came down just before the scheduled Disney release of Fahrenheit 9/11 -- hence the now famous Disney refusal to release F911.

By the way, did you know that Aylwin Lewis sits on the board of directors for both Disney AND Halliburton? Hmmmm....

[GreenPartyVoter]

19. True, but didn't blowing up the WTC hurt the Suadis in some way? Maybe

the lost paperwork here and there proved to be a minor inconvenience at times?

Well, if not Diseny, perhaps another major theme park?

[nikraye]

20. Probably a liberal city would be targeted...

the neocons hate San Fran, Boston, NYC, Seattle...any city with a high concentration of libs. Attacking one of these metro centers would, in their minds, serve to *convert* masses of libs to their side.

Don't expect any Bush/Cheney-enginneered "terrorist" attacks in Texas or Florida.

[GreenPartyVoter]

21. They hate Hollywood too, which is why I am thinking maybe LA/Hollywood

[nikraye]

23. Arnold would veto any plans to hit LA/Hollywood.

[GreenPartyVoter]

24. But Ahnold would make a great unsuspecting martyr for the cause

[nikraye]

27. You're right. ..

Just look at what 9/11 did for butt-boy, Rudy Giuliani. And his complicity secured for him some pretty lucrative business deals with BushCo and gained him a very big spotlight at the 2004 Rep Nat'l Convention.

Yup, you're right. Ahnold would sell his soul for such an opportunity. Oh wait, he's already sold his soul to Bushco, so perhaps the blueprint for 9/11 Part II has already been made.

[MindPilot]

3. Realistically, another attack would be a death-knell for the GOP

They've lived for four years on "Bush's policies have kept us safe" and "The invasion of Iraq is obviously working since there have been no more attacks."

Another attack would mean that everything they've done from the Patriot Act to Gitmo has failed to stop terrorism.

[bunny planet]

4. I agree, but they are desperate now. It will at the very least give them

the opportunity to go into Marshall law mode. That will effectively shut down dissent. I know it's a cliche at this point but I put NOTHING past these people. Much more likely they'll attack out troops in a big way at the Syrian border and then blame it on either Syria or Iran or both.

[Tux]

6. But

An attack would destroy the image of Bush protecting America through god's grace. He kept saying that we're safe and war in Iraq is doing it. If another attack appears, I'd expect fundies to blame Bush for god removing the cone of protection. And it would confirm Bush's need for tyranny to maintain his power.

[bunny planet]

10. That's why I said I think they are more likely to engineer a prominent

attack on our military overseas. This creates the fear factor among Americans again, makes them thirsty for revenge again, and also reinforces the insane * premise that 'we have to continue fighting them over there to keep from having to fight them over here.' This is what I think they will try and get away with, that or a spectacular capture of either Ayman Al Zawahiri (the real #2 man) or Osama or Mullah Omar. They've known where they are all along, need them to pull a rabbit out of their hats just in case things get dicey with the American public.

[Broken Acorn]

5. You're right MindPilot but

The BFEE would use another large scale attack to tell us how we NEED the Patriot Act even more now and probably expand its capabilities.

The only other trump card they have is probably rolling out OBL and saying thow this is a huge win in the war on terra.

[Alizaryn]

7. My thoughts exactly

I've been feeling this too for the past month as the pressure on his-highness increases. One of the times in life when I really, really hope that I am wrong.

[ailsagirl]

16. I hope I'm wrong too-- I'd be ecstatic were that the case

But I think these guys are the epitomy of corruption, greed,
and evil and, frankly, wouldn't put anything past them.

[dbonds]

8. They are not desperate now.

That won't come till the next election cycle. Look for spring '06. Right now they don't care what we think. They are doing their build up to war in Iran now, all they care is that that war goes on plan.

[mtnsnake]

9. Oh come on. That's the last thing Bush wants right now

If another attack were to happen, and I hate to even think about something like that, Bush's ratings would plummet even further. Let's face it, his only claim to fame right now is the illusion that he's been protecting us from further attacks, so why would he want to diminish the only thing he's got going for him?

Now if you're going to say that he wants to keep everyone SCARED of a future attack, then that's a different story. I'm sure when election time rolls around in 2006, the scare tactics will dramatically increase again. As far as another attack itself, let's hope no one wants something like that, especially this imbecile of a president we have.

[ailsagirl]

14. But after 9/11, his numbers soared!!

He can't get high numbers by making intelligent decisions (obviously) so how else can he get the American people on his side and raise his numbers again??

I hope I'm wrong but I don't put anything past these criminals.

[Old and In the Way]

11. We weren't psychologically prepared for 9/11.....we are now.

No way does this administration get a pass like they got on 9/11. This time we have 4 years worth of understanding under our belts. Too many have connected the dots and know their complicity to let it happen. An attack now would validate our expectations that they can't or won't stop terror. I think there'd be a HUGE negative backlash against this administration.

[Broken Acorn]

12. So some of us are prepared now, but so what?

Think of all the sheeple running around with their heads cut off?

Our country would turn into a scary military state overnight for sure. The balance of power could permanently swing to the neocons.

This new attack would solve all their problems.

They could roll out a permament draft so we can go into Syria and Iran. Who would confront this admininstration if it was mandatory? Our repuke-controlled house and senate and judicial systems? People like Lieberman? Please. If they didn't confront * on the WMD lies, how would they stop him now?

If the media is hardly covering the DSM now, it would never be mentioned again with all the new war planning and 'For us or against us' rhetoric.

I don't buy the argument that people would say that * didn't keep us safe. Think of all the lies that Rove would come out with and how we had to trust and support our troops now more than ever.

It has gotten so bad for the WH that I believe we are very close to this reality.

[Old and In the Way]

28. Well, we won't know until it happens I guess.

It could go either way......I just believe that they'd be "all in"....then everyone shows their cards. We line up and see who has the numbers. I know what side I'll be standing on.

[HughBeaumont]

13. Somehow, I believe even THAT wouldn't help them . . .

. . . and for the reason that a light might go off in EVERYONE's heads that maybe, just MAYBE, this administration indeed does MIHOP cooked "terror attacks" for their own gain. Not even the biggest Bush-addled jackass will be able to deny it then. Only the lobotomy patients will still look to Great Leader for guidance.

[ailsagirl]

15. Well, unfortunately there are plenty of lobotomy patients in this

country-- who insist they're safer with chimpo in power. Who
think he's the greatest. Who are deep into gross cognitive dissonance. BRAINWASHED

I don't believe anything would change their minds about *

[HughBeaumont]

22. Common sense, though . . . what are the odds?

Of four hijacked and destroyed planes at once, two buildings collapsing and then a second terror attack of that same magnitude happening within 4-5 years of each other? There's gotta be some point where you just can't pin it on mere coincidence any longer.

[AntiCoup2K4]

17. "Never roll out a new product before Labor Day"

Isn't that Rove's rule?

I don't think they'll pull any shit during the summer. Too many corporations would lose money if people cancelled their vacations out of fear and/or martial law. Not the last of which would be the oil companies.

[GreenPartyVoter]

25. Yep. That thought has been stuck in my mind as I wait for the next mihop

[ArkDem]

26. Is duck tape manufactured for the purpose of taping ducks?

[RJRoss]

29. Next terror attack

My darkest fear is that Osama bin Laden is in Pakistan, trying to buy a nuke to use in Baghdad. His goal is to kill Americans, and drive us out of the Middle East. There are thousands of Americans in Baghdad, and if thousands died at once, Bush would be pressed hard to bring those left alive home.