Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Letter to DNC re recent survey to Democratic activists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 03:48 AM
Original message
Letter to DNC re recent survey to Democratic activists
On one of my lists, shared with the permission of the writer. If you'd like to contact her directly, PM me.

Director of Grassroots Marketing
Democratic National Committee
430 South Capitol Street SE
Washington, DC 20003

June 21, 2005

Re: Recent survey to Democratic activists

To whom it may concern:

I have received today a survey and donation solicitation from the DNC that bears all the hallmarks of a manipulative marketing campaign designed to make unimportant people feel important. The manipulation starts from the registration number that, obviously, serves no purpose except to give people the feeling that their every little blip of opinion is just pure gold to the DNC. And it extends all the way through the shining sobriquet of "democratic leader" bestowed upon the recipient. The whole thing is bogus, cynical and insulting.

The uselessness of the survey itself makes it even clearer that this is all a marketing ploy to butter us up and get our money. This survey is clearly designed by marketers who are unconnected with the mission of the organization they serve. The respondent is asked to prioritize a list of 10 items to indicate which are the important issues facing our country today.

But all the most important issues are simply missing from this list. The rise of corporate power and the decline of its accountability; the ever-increasing consolidation of media and its cooption by government and corporations; the collapse of election accountability; a campaign finance system that puts politicians in the pockets of the rich; the increasing stranglehold on our democratic institutions by the military-industrial complex; the active suppression of science by this administration and the infiltration of the religious right into our institutions of government: none of these appear. It is as if this survey was written 20 years ago. It is as if Howard Dean, who signs the survey, never was born.

I have given the DNC money. I have given money to Democratic candidates, including Howard Dean. I have sacrificed to make these contributions. I have put in many hours of work on behalf of Democratic campaigns. Your marketing outreach kills, not enhances, my desire to help the DNC. And I know I am not alone. Who likes to be manipulated?

I hear a lot of talk about how stupid people are these days. It appears that those who put together this survey are of this opinion, that people are just stupid. Howard Dean said the opposite during his campaign; he said that people have power and wisdom.

He is absolutely right about this. I hope your organization finds a way to integrate this wisdom of Dr. Dean's into its operations. I hope you find a way, in general, to integrate your operations so that marketing sends the same message as the office of the Chairman.

Political vendors have driven a wedge between people and politics these past 50 years. They operate campaigns according to what is advantageous for them. The welfare of the candidate and the campaign come second after their own. The welfare of the people who are asked the support the campaigns don't appear to be on the radar screen. And the state of society in general, the level of trust that people have for each other and for the institutions serving them, well it almost seems that political vendors profit from degrading this trust. I am sure that this is not, personally, the case for you. However, this campaign for which you are responsible fits right into the old ugly tradition of political vendoring that violates trust.

Asking people's opinions useless questions in a way designed to arouse their sense of importance is like taking an instrument exquisitely tuned to kill trust and inserting it right into the civic heart.

Sincerely,
Noemie Maxwell Vassilakis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 04:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. scathingly excellent!
:applause: and recommended.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 04:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree . . . those damned surveys go directly to my circular file . . .
I also hate being manipulated . . . and I particularly hate being considered stupid enough to BE manipulated in this fashion . . . kudos to you for throwing it back in their faces . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. So eloquent, and so so right! I hope someone reads it and CHANGES
things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catbird Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. If election fraud isn't listed, write it in!!
I just received one of these from Hillary Clinton. I did not check off any of the responses related to the issues listed (all of which I think are important). I simply wrote on there "#1 -- election fraud. Unless this is addressed, none of the others matter." I then returned the "survey" with no money. I intend to do this with all such requests from people who are not addressing this issue.

Please note that this is not meant as a criticism specifically of Hillary Clinton. She is not the only one apparently downplaying this issue or sending out such solicitations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. write in the entire third paragraph!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihaveaquestion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
6. Thank You for writing what I've been feeling!
Kicked and recommended!

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. You did better than I did.
I just wrote comments all over the survey and enclosed that with some other junk mail I had lying around in the business reply envelope.

Yours was probably more constructive. Mine will get me off their mailing list. Did the same thing with the stupid survey I got from Hilary too.

Nice job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. Let me get this straight
Dean is trying to turn this into a less "top-to-bottom" organization and you're fighting him on it. Is that what I'm getting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. No, the plan is to have the funding solicitations actually MATCH...
...the their tone with that of a real grassroots organization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I agree with your criticism of this survey.
A friend of mine received the survey a couple of months ago.

He showed it to myself and 4 other friends. We all thought that the issues part was lacking. We also thought that the multiple choice questions were very slanted. They often did not include viewpoints that a significant portion of Dem voters would take on the issues. And yes, we would agree that the survey seems outdated in some way, too.

I have also seen serious criticisms of the survey online...where some people have even included the questions.

I encourage anyone here to actually look at the questions and survey before rejecting criticism of it.

The DNC can do better. Let's ask them to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. A "multiple choice opinion survey"....
A "multiple choice opinion survey" is an INSULT to all thinking Human Beings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Recommended!
Here is why.

Question#1 tried to force a list of issues upon survey-takers. There was one blank to fill in. Constructive criticism: if you have 10 issues, then give 10 blanks. Do this for a sample before sending out the whole survey and use resulting feedback to revamp the original list. This modification would allow the survey to actually be bottom-up grassroots instead of more top-down junk.

This survey is an insult to our intelligence with its multiple choice opinions. Here is an example...Question#2:
"2. Which of the following statements most closely matches your view when it comes to extending the life of Social Security?
__Privatize the program to allow workers to invest some of their Social Security payroll contributions in the stock market
__Cut benefits or raise the retirement age to extend the life of Social Security
__Use means testing to reduce benefits for wealthy or high income retirees
__No changes in Social Security are necessary"

There is no option for raising or eliminating the $80,000 or $90,000 cap, which many Dems are in favor of. Constructive criticism: Add a blank option to be filled in by the survey taker. Do this for a sample before sending out the whole survey and use resulting feedback to revamp the original list. This modification would allow the survey to actually be bottom-up grassroots instead of more top-down junk.

Here's another question with limited options. Question#5:
"5. Do you support raising the minimum wage from its current level of $5.15 per hour?
__Yes, the minimum wage should be increased to help workers make ends meet.
__No, raising the minimum wage will hurt small businesses and cost jobs"

Every Democratic Presidential candidate was for raising the minimum wage. The only question was how much the minimim wage should be raised. The 2004 Democratic Presidential candidates had different answers, but all agreed on this premise. So, why didn't the survey give options as to how much to raise the wage?

Is it because the survey question was created before the 2004 Elections? Or is it that the survey creators are just out of touch with the party's voters? Constructive criticism: Again, give a blank answer optionally to be filled in by the survey taker. For this question, survey takers could have filled in what they thought the minimum wage should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
welshTerrier2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-22-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. the huge gap between elite Democrats and the rest of us
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 11:17 PM by welshTerrier2
this paragraph just killed me:

"But all the most important issues are simply missing from this list. The rise of corporate power and the decline of its accountability; the ever-increasing consolidation of media and its cooption by government and corporations; the collapse of election accountability; a campaign finance system that puts politicians in the pockets of the rich; the increasing stranglehold on our democratic institutions by the military-industrial complex; the active suppression of science by this administration and the infiltration of the religious right into our institutions of government: none of these appear<sic>."

ultimately, many of us see our great American institutions being abused by powerful, monied interests ... we see our democracy being put at risk ... we see our core industries and technologies (and jobs) being dessimated ... the bottom line is that we believe our country has been taken over by un-American forces ... this sits at the heart of what we want to hear from our "leaders" ... sadly, to a great degree, it is not even on their radar ...

btw, what choices were provided in the survery re: the occupation of Iraq? how about the likely attacks on Iran and Syria? what choices were provided to Democratic survey takers about nuclear disarmament in the US?

thanks for posting this great letter ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Nothing about Iran or Syria. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. Did this come from the DNC or the DCCC/DSCC or someone else?
I haven't seen it so I'm actually curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 03:01 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. DNC, apparently. It was signed by Dean n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-05 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
16. You do realize of course that this is the precise method the RNC uses?
I applaud your friend for her letter, she's dead on right. It's bad enough watching Republicans becomes mindless zombies for this kind of fawning attention from the RNC -- and the entire Bush** administration -- but to see the DNC employing the same sleazy "Gosh, you're so special" tactics for donations while ignoring the serious issues is an insult.

Screw the marketing mind-games. We're PEOPLE, you're supposed to work for and represent US. You'll get our support AND our money when you quit behaving like used car salesmen and R-E-S-P-E-C-T the relationship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Don1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
18. How many people
on DU took this survey anyway?

And how did you feel about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC