Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Kerry or Edwards is the nominee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Darth_Ole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:32 PM
Original message
If Kerry or Edwards is the nominee
I don't see how we can go hard on Bush about the war. They voted for it and supported it. The best they can do is say that he hasn't handled the peace well. But they can't say this was a bad war.

And Edwards can't say the Patriot Act is chipping away at our liberties. He was one of the authors of the bill!

I like all the candidates (excepting Lieberman) and would support any of them. But does anyone else think it would be hard to oppose Bush's war if certain people are nominated?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. DK said this at the dinner last night
"What do they have to debate with Bush?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Edwards didn't author any part of the PA. Elizabeth Edwards blogged about
this lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leyton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. It's a shame this keeps coming up.
I mean, this Edwards writing the patriot act thing comes up in about every thread. I think even if Skinner pinned a correction at the top of the forum (like he did the GDP2004 rules) people would still be posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. We will take the White House. Edwards. Kerry. Fantastic.
These issues are much more complex than you make them. But the American people understand. Check out Edwards on C-SPAN now. You'll see why he WILL win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of course they can
They can cite the numerous lies that were told to drag us into this war. They can cite the NUMEROUS opinions on many many security experts (republicans included) concerning the COSTS of the war and they can cite the numerous miltary experts (again, Republicans included) on the actual execution of the war. They can cite DECADES of studies and scholars including people from Poppy's administration on why this war has turned out so poorly and so unpredictable and they can cite the closed door meetings in which security contracts were not vetted by congress to pay back big time donors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cindyw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Anyone who doubts this should hve seen Face the Nation &
Fox News this morning.

1. Bush, Cheney and the CIA presented false information to the Congress.

Only Dems who don't like Kerry and Edwards make the argument that they knew it was lies and they didn't. What will Bush say? Will he even try to claim that he didn't know it was lies? If he even dared to say to Kerry that he voted to support him, Kerry can reply, "you lied to me". I think that will do just fine. Everyone here, even Dean supporters, shout that Bush lied, but somehow we cannot allow Kerry to say this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU9598 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not about the war to most of America
I don't think we would really want a candidate in the general election to have to argue about the war. Even in Iowa, most of caucus goers (party faithful) were not anti-war. In my opinion, having an anti-war candidate is a recipe for a big loss in November. I think Kerry and Edwards are the two best chances to deliver for Democrats in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. most were anti war, but kerry won the anti war vote
i believe edwards got more anti war voters than dean also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
8. One word: Jobs
I was against the war 150%. And I think we could make a lot of arguements about it, but I don't think the war will be the big issue in November.

I think the big issue will be jobs: how many, what they pay, what benefits they offer, and if they are about to moved overseas.

I think the airways will be filled with ads about how Bush's tax cuts took us out of the bad economy he inherited (absolute lies, but there you are).

That's why I think the Democratic candidates should make good use of all of the free publicity they are getting now. They should all be hammering Bush on the economy. At least one of them should do the old Ross Perot thing and show charts that depict job growth under Clinton and job loss under Bush. They should show charts revealing surplus and deficit growth under Clinton and Bush. They should show these over and over and over just to combat the lies Bush will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DjTj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's what most Americans believe...
...that Saddam Hussein was evil and that it's a good thing that he's gone, but that we should have gotten more international support and that there should have been more of a plan in place for after the war.

John Edwards also knows a thing or two about civil liberties and the responsibility of being an attorney, and he can say a lot about what John Ashcroft is doing wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastknowngood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. the war is not an issue with most
people with the hiding of the coffins and the fake casualty figures and the media covering anything else most people don't know s--t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC