chelsea0011
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-23-05 06:13 AM
Original message |
Brush fires? Didn't Bush say he would end them? |
|
It wasn't long ago that Bush said that the Clinton policies were responsible for the rash of wild fires. And the MSM picked up on his accusation and questioned all the Clinton policies. You know the drill. Blame Clinton for everything. Now that it is wild fire season and fires are breaking out there is no questioning of why the Bush policy has had no effect but for lining the pockets of special interests. You know the drill. Don't blame Bush for anything.
|
China_cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-23-05 06:26 AM
Response to Original message |
1. No, that was about FOREST fires |
|
You know, he said cutting down all the trees would stop forest fires.
|
HawkerHurricane
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-23-05 06:46 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
since the series of brush fires in Southern California occured in National Forests, BushCo said that the trees needed to be cut down. So, since we're still having brush fires...
|
leesa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-23-05 08:02 AM
Response to Original message |
3. No TREE fires...gotta get rid of them pesky trees. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 02:42 AM
Response to Original message |