|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Fire (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:02 PM Original message |
Eminent Domain: Hell Freezing over, I agree with Scalia and Thomas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. unfortunately the property owner has NEVER won these cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:08 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Which is why |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:10 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Even if the price is fair ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 03:05 PM Response to Reply #4 |
26. if you are 80 years old and big brother says we own your property |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. How do you compensate a retired couple |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:07 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's how Prez Bush made his money... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kath (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 12:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
37. exactamundo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GainesT1958 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
5. If the decision had gone the other way... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
14. WRONG, WRONG, WRONG |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:49 PM Response to Reply #5 |
22. Suits me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 08:06 PM Response to Reply #5 |
31. This is for the benefit of CORPORATIONS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. the states may pass laws against this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. They might in CA, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugarbleus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 09:03 PM Response to Reply #8 |
35. DUer Cleitas posted some weeks ago that a mobile home park |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
15. THEY CAN'T! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:43 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Not if it deals with a state statute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:44 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Yes they can. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:14 PM Response to Original message |
7. This is a terrible decision, ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. I saw a piece about this on 60 minutes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. heard about that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:22 PM Response to Original message |
10. PS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
11. i agree with the liberals on the Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:44 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 03:33 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. re: your 3 points ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:53 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. "public use" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
welshTerrier2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 03:54 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. i agree in part ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 08:34 AM Response to Reply #28 |
41. First, rezoning is not a seizure... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
12. Deleted message |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:45 PM Response to Reply #12 |
19. I remember the Breyer nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
21. You should probably read the decision and consider |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doodadem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 02:54 PM Response to Original message |
24. Don't know about other parts of the country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 03:03 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Deliberate tax losses? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
doodadem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 07:52 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. And they're going to take peoples' HOMES to do that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 08:47 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. For that type, there's no such thing as "enough tax breaks" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProudDad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 07:57 PM Response to Original message |
30. Just saw the news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fire (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 08:10 PM Response to Original message |
32. Free Republic's take on this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugarbleus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 09:24 PM Response to Reply #32 |
36. Except for the inference that this ruling is "Socialism" and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sugarbleus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jun-23-05 08:14 PM Response to Original message |
33. I just posted my discontent before I saw your post...I thought no one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
38. and I agree with Sandra Day O'Connor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 02:09 AM Response to Reply #38 |
39. Why did the more liberal judges vote the way they did? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 08:37 AM Response to Reply #39 |
42. What liberal judges? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaGreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 07:19 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. There are no liberals on the Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Independent_Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jun-24-05 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
40. I guess hell is freezing over... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC