Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove created this firestorm on purpose. The question is why.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:30 PM
Original message
Rove created this firestorm on purpose. The question is why.
KKKarl never says anything off the cuff or acts impulsively. He is the most sneaky and diabolical worm feeding on the rotten * administration. My opinion is that this whole incident was carefully designed to deflect attention away from DSM and the increasing anger about Iraq.

How often have we seen that pasty bloated face appear before the camera spewing anything, much less something that might incriminate him? I don't remember the last time. He's acting as a lightning rod for attacks that should be directed, and until yesterday, were being aimed, at * and Rumsfeld. This entire episode is bogus. Even if * "fires" KKKarl, meaning he'll announce a desire to spend more time with the family, Rove will keep pulling all the strings. The phony sacrifice would have been made simply to pacify the agitated masses. Let them eat cake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. The more he divides the two parties, the better for the Administration
and they get the support. We need to overcome this party division and work together as Americans to oust this administration. Rove knows that and keeps us divided...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. He also wants to cleave liberals from leftists.
He wants to separate mainstream liberals who supported military action against the Taliban from the leftwing activists who opposed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Moveon.org released a statement
saying they did not oppose the war in Afghanistan. Now who are they going to reference Karl's comment to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. When in doubt, they always invoke Michael Moore.
Never mind that Michael Moore is neither a Democrat nor a leftist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. The Answer to that is He should of said Michael Moore then
If it is one person, then the whole statement falls apart. Move-on did not feel that way, we did not feel that way, and if Michael Moore did, he should of stated Michael Moore only. And I don't even know what Michael Moore's policy was towards Afghanistan, do you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Moore was strongly opposed to using military force against the Taliban.
Moore was actually persona non grata among mainstream liberals when he made some atrocious remarks after 911, and for his opposition to the destruction of the Taliban.

But, then Bush began preparing for the invasion of Iraq, and Moore gained credibility as a critic of that effort.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think we have a winner!
Good deduction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. It is a diversion. 9/11 a phony
act. He should be put in jail. bush's numbers are too far down and they need a reason to try to get them up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impeachthescoundrel Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. I agree
Saying such things will make us forget(well you know)about the DSM. In fact I think that even with the dismal opinion of Americans re: Iraq and everyrhing else going on, the DSM MUST remain an afterthought with the public as a whole. Have you noticed how much this week we have seen KKKarl on the news? That, my friend, is no accident. Somebody is scared, as well they should be.

Perhaps at last my prayer will be answered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. divert attention from other issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Put it this way: Remember Red Baiting during the Cold War??
Remember the Democrats response? "I reject the accusations of my opponent. Why, no one hates Communists more than I do!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. The usual diversions were not working to deflect the DSM questions and
he had to prove to Cheney that he would 'take one for the team'. Perhaps the option diversion was somebody ratting out the Plame leaker?

They are getting desperate and running out of smoke grenades to throw at the media. Now it gets interesting & dangerous. Look for real tragedy if the DSM stay on front page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Exactly like a "magician" on a stage: MISDIRECTION
And a whole bunch of other MIS-es:
Mislead;
Mistake;
Missing;
Mischaracterization;
Mis-apprehend;
Misanthropic . . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. New torture photos are to be released next week
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. I think you're right here.
He's trying to paint the Bushies as the only ones with the guts to "do what it takes," including torture, to "protect" us from the terrorists. They're going to try to get us to accept torture as a legitimate antiterrorist measure, something that needed to be done but that the bleeding-heart liberals, with their talk of indictments and therapy wouldn't have the fortitude to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pointsoflight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Don't let it work...it's easy to make it backfire on him.
Don't get riled up about his attack on liberals. That's want he wants us to do in order to divert attention from the failed policies of the Bush administration.

DON'T focus on this:

"Liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers."

Instead focus on this:

"Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 and the attacks and prepared for war."

Use Rove's own comments as the basis for discussing how the Bush adminstration turned their attention away from the actual attackers to rush to war against Iraq, how the Bush administration has mismanaged and failed to adequately prepare for our military action in the middle east, etc.

Here's a great come-back to Roves comments...

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/6/24/94035/0253
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Excellent! The FAILED war on terrorism, at least in terms of catching OBL
and most if not all of the other 9/11 masterminds, is something they have no answer for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. Indictments would have been very GOOD!
Therapy? Are we less human than others; didn't 9/11 HURT us too? Of course we feel the need to strike the guilty - in AFGHANISTAN.

George got drunk on his own power = Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melissinha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
28. I agree!
I don't deny that
Liberals saw what happened to us and said we must understand our enemies.

You are damned straight.. but I see that statement differently, we want to understand the enemy so that we can negotiate diplomatically without having to spend trillions of $$ and thousands of lives so that you can illegally hand over duffel bags full of cash to your friends without a paper trail.

and as you said:

Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 and the attacks and prepared for war.

Thats fair... but only for a war against Osama Bin Laden... Thats the type of additude that Rove shows for his political enemies... they attack without thinking! attack attack attack!

Sounds like somebody isn't well-endowed!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. In hopes that dems would assert they're tough and support Bush on Iraq
But, I think that damn few will fall for that as this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Dems are grown ups; they know there MUST be something actually
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 12:51 PM by patrice
Successful about Bush's Damned War, which EVERYONE but it's actual perpetrator(traitor?) is/will be paying for FOREVER!

Rove: "ON to IRAN!!!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Why don't all of us just LAUGH at him? Laugh every time he says anything.
He is SO full of Shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm guessing they didn't expect any backlash
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 01:14 PM by gratuitous
According to Faux News, the White House has been a little surprised by the reaction to Turd Blossom's intemperate comments. These guys really think they're bulletproof and it isn't just the tequila talking.

Folks should all pursue their own agendas as much as necessary, but I think that Rove and his White House master have been injured by this little dust-up. For those of us who would like to pursue the little weasel and run him to ground, please just let us go. If the Downing Street Memo is important to you, or the mounting casualties in Iraq, or whatever other atrocity this administration is committing boils your oil more, by all means pursue them on it. For those of us who'd like to remove Bush's brain from the White House, let us continue after him without catcalls of "sideshow" or "distraction." We're aware of that. We're also aware that this appears to be the best chance in a long time of inflicting a really bad wound on this corrupt administration.

{Edited to change media reference to Faux News from the New York Times}
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tamarin Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. I agree with you 100%
There are many fronts on which to attack the republicans, let us all chose our battles, we can cover them all. This blow-back on Rove is hurting them, they may be laughing but Rove looks petty and partisan as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. Rove thinks he's smarter than others: Backlash from smart people.
In a fair game Rove, Cheney, Bush, Rice, Wolfowitz, Scooter et al wouldn't stand a chance against MOST of the opposition.

Anyone/I could see the problems with their designs from the beginning of their "PNAC-ian Project" and I'm not all that "smart". The OBVIOUS flaws throughout the administration indicate that getting it right doesn't matter.

................................

I don't know how Bush sleeps at night, without drugs, for fear of dreams of all of the children he killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eissa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Simple
His comments get a lot of coverage -- the right wing message is repeated constantly on the MSM. And Rove, like all repukes, will never apologize and * will never fire his master. We keep making a fuss, keeping his comments in the headlines, while they laugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. It should be used as a springboard for our langauge/issues
Everytime he tries this, use it as an opportunity to respond, on camera, with your issues/language - CONNECTIONS - segue to - MISTAKES proove competence does not matter in this administration - or whatever . . . Be creative (it's called "squirrel killing" on high school debate teams) - Use what they are doing to distract you/us as an opportunity to get to your language/issues in front of the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wurzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. This may be true. But should he get away with calling Dems traitors?
What is "bogus" about Rove saying Durbin wants to get our troops killed? With the appalling record on planning this war he has given the Dems a total gift to direct attention to exactly how the Repukes responded to 911. It is up to the Dems to expose the rubbish he gabbled. And by naming names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I think we had to respond to the little fascist.
All I'm stating what I think his reasons are. Better strategists than moi can figure out the best way to counterattack. Bu, imo, we have to go after them, and not defensively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
19. Here's an idea why he might be doing it:
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 12:41 PM by iconoclastic cat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. Abu Ghraib news dump next week
remember, we only "mistreated" the detainees because they are BAD PEOPLE and STRUCK AT THE US! (9/11 lie) Therefore all the grisly photos of our Non-Nazi All American prison guards "mistreating" those soulless nonhuman naked animals are HEROES! and Democrats are traitors for wanting to baby them!!!

(Think it will fly? Only if we as a country really are soulless, heartless Nazis like Rove thinks.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
July Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Or later today?
Friday afternoon news dump? Get it out there before 4th of July weekend?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire Walk With Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #25
32. Of course if BushCo LIHOP'd or MIHOP'd, THEY'RE the ones mistreating USA
And are simply mocking us constantly. What cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
33. Top DEMs are glad- now they dont have to talk about the DSM...
..they were really worried about sticking their necks out on that one.

...now they can go back to talking about "safe" bullshit and can point to it and say "See we DO fight Bush- we asked for an apology too!!! Now, about that check..."

DEMs should say "Rove is just trying to distract the media form covering the DSM- the media fell for it as usual."

But the Top DEMs cant say that, b/c they dont want to talk about the DSM either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Yes, of course. They have to know.
This gives them perfect cover for ignoring the real crimes. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
35. The Neo-Cons got in power because they dividend the moderates.
I agree pretty much with dogday in this thread. The moderates from both Parties have been in control until Karl. His inflammatory speech is aimed at continuing to wedge apart the Countries' moderates. I have seen Demo reactions spouting hate toward all Republicans. This is exactly what Karl wants. We need to direct our criticism at the leaders not the Republican rank and file. Even though they are culpable for the current situation. We need desperately to win over the moderate republicans, or loose again and again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Also, I think this is a diversion from the DSM. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. False framing.
"Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 and the attacks and prepared for war."

The Bush Regime prepared for war, an illegal Invasion of Iraq, before 9/11. 9/11 was their wished for "Pearl Harbor" which gave them the excuse to invade Iraq. They mfg. false intell. and lied to Congress. Impeachment is required!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
38. Rove went skinny dipping because
Bush is bleeding in the water and Rove will not have to run for election, so he does not care. He knows that the corporate owned media monopoly prostitutes will cover him as best they can. The Downing Street Memos are having effect in spite of said prostitutes urine poor effort to cover them. Note that when they do cover them, the most damaging section that "the intelligence was being fixed around the policy" is hardly ever mentioned and on the rare occasion when it is, you would think they are talking about astrophysics. Simply put while Clinton, Gore and Kerry thought there may be WMDs in Iraq, they never lied about nukes, aluminum tubes and yellowcake uranium from Niger,unmanned aerial vehicles, scary trailers and Saddam attacking us in 45 minutes. The media prostitutes can only stall this for a limited period of time, unless we get sidetracked by Rove's ugly posterior end splashing in the water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
39. Fear
Often I'm unsure, see both sides of something. But on this question of Rove..I'm a 123% sure it's the old fear button.

Fear is the only thing they've EVER fucking had.

Fear of gay people.

Fear of the true progress that liberals have made in this country for Gays, women, miniorities.

Fear fear fear

Fear that liberals are the "weak" ones and thus, they will lead you straight to your DEATH! Oh my God..the liberals will get us all killed. If you boil down the essence of Limbaugh or Hannity..it's the same deal.

Fear.

Remember 9/11- of course-out of FEAR people will turn on their neighbor, sacrifice their liberties, their wallets..everything..even attack ANYONE just to FEEL safer.

Fear.

Of course the great big irony is that attacking Iraq has done nothing for our safety and most certainly made everything worse.

As my daughter would say, it's backwards day..ever damn day for these people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
retread Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
40. I don't ascribe any great powers of manipulation or cunning to this
worm. Any immoral half-wit could do the same given the tools KKKarl has to work with. This kind of crap is what he does. I doubt he thought there would be any consequences and there may not be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
42. It's all we are talking about
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC