Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Conyers: Drumbeat Continues on DSM

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:42 PM
Original message
John Conyers: Drumbeat Continues on DSM
Edited on Fri Jun-24-05 06:59 PM by paineinthearse
http://www.conyersblog.us/

Drumbeat Continues on DSM

A couple of more stories to bring to your attention. The Knight Ridder news service has done exemplarary work on this issue, running several early and useful articles. Today, they ran another good article, detailing how the American public is souring on the war. They included a particularly good passage ridiculing the White House press office dismissing my investigation, since I voted against military action in the first place: "Did you catch the irony? Conyers has no credibility to challenge the president's actions toward Iraq, the White House argues, because Conyers has opposed the war from the beginning. Yet just a few months ago, the Bush people ridiculed Sen. John Kerry because Kerry allegedly supported the war before being against it - remember all the giddy supporters chanting ``Flip-flop! Flip-flop!''

I also would point out a great opinion piece in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer entitled "Bush's pre-emptive war pre-empted Congress." Everyone of you who submits pieces like this to their local media, is doing a valuable service in keeping this critical issue in the public eye.

I am working on follow up to the hearing, and hope to have more to share with you next week.

The Knight-Ridder article:

http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/newssentinel/news/editorial/11965588.htm

Posted on Thu, Jun. 23, 2005

Americans inching closer to a reckoning

BY ROBERT STEINBACK
Knight Ridder Newspapers

(KRT) - Do you want to know?

That's the only popular division that matters in the United States today: Those who want to determine once and for all if President Bush knowingly ``fixed the facts'' regarding Iraq, thereby misleading Congress and the American people into supporting an unnecessary war, and those who will cover their ears and hum loudly in order to maintain their belief that Bush and his advisors remain above reproach. You're in one camp or the other. Either you want to know if you've been lied to, or you don't.

The American public is inching tentatively toward a reckoning unlike any this nation has ever experienced. The oh-so-clever Bush administration strategists and their quasi-media acolytes, who have kept the reckoning at bay with a deft combination of we're-at-war patriotic fervor and fear-the-evil-liberals rhetoric, are running out of parlor tricks.

Rep. John Conyers of Michigan last week held an unofficial public briefing - despite being forced into a tiny Capitol Hill basement by GOP leaders - to talk about the so-called Downing Street Memo. The July 2002 memo, published in the Times of London on May 1, recounted the views of top advisers to Prime Minister Tony Blair that the Bush administration had already made up its mind to invade Iraq despite an absence of justification, and that it appeared facts were being manipulated to support the policy.

Since its publication, other information has surfaced revealing that the Americans and the British tried unsuccessfully to provoke Saddam Hussein into giving them a justification for war - first by launching an unauthorized bombing campaign in 2002, then by pushing the United Nations to demand weapons inspectors return to Iraq - a gambit Hussein trumped by agreeing to do so. After the briefing, Conyers carried a letter to the White House, signed by more than 120 House members, asking for answers to questions provoked by the Downing Street Memo. Not only was Conyers rebuffed, he was slighted. White House press secretary Scott McClellan, in a press briefing that day, dismissed Conyers as ``an individual who voted against the war in the first place and is simply trying to rehash old debates that have already been addressed.''

more......

---

ABOUT THE WRITER

Robert Steinback is a columnist for The Miami Herald. Readers may write to him at: One Herald Plaza, Miami, Fla. 33132, or via e-mail at rsteinback@herald.com.


The Seattle PI op-ed:

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/229775_loeb24.html

SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/229775_loeb24.html

Bush's pre-emptive war pre-empted Congress
Friday, June 24, 2005

PAUL LOEB
GUEST COLUMNIST

It's bad enough that the Bush administration had so little international support for the Iraqi war that their "coalition of the willing" meant the United States, Britain and the equivalent of a child's imaginary friends. It's even worse that, as the British Downing Street memo confirms, administration officials had so little evidence of real threats that they knew from the start that they were going to have to manufacture excuses to go to war. What's more damning still is that they effectively began this war even before the congressional vote.

With Rep. John Conyers holding hearings, the media are finally starting to cover the Downing Street memo. This transcript of a July 23, 2002, British prime minister's meeting, whose legitimacy the British government confirms, details their response to the Bush administration's intention to go to war against Iraq, no matter how Saddam Hussein responded, and even while claiming they were still seeking peaceful solutions.

"It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action, even if the timing was not yet decided," states the document. "But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbors, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran." As the document states, "The intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

The document is damning, particularly coupled with the testimony of former Bush ghostwriter Mickey Herskowitz that Bush was talking about invading Iraq as early as 1999. But it's even more disturbing as we start learning that this administration began actively fighting the Iraq war well in advance of the March 2003 official attack -- before both the October 2002 congressional authorization and the November United Nations resolution requiring that Saddam open the country up to inspectors.

more........

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paul Loeb of Seattle is the author of "The Impossible Will Take a Little While: A Citizen's Guide to Hope in a Time of Fear" (Basic Books), www.theimpossible.org.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TayTay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Kick
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Investigate. Impeach.
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Knight Ridder, Seattle paper--woohoo--CONYERS RULES
There is nothing more dangerous than an honest man with courage and intelligence. That's our guy JC.

When you're thinking about a position on foreign or domestic policy or whether or not the election was stolen, ask youselves:

WWJCD==What Would John Conyers Do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Well said Autorank.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Let's recommend some of those WWJCD braclets for the DU SHOP
:rofl:

Actually, it would be as good as anything they've got, which is pretty damn good.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MellowOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick
Love Conyers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. *Kick*
'"coalition of the willing" meant the United States, Britain and the equivalent of a child's imaginary friends...'

Yep.

let's continue to contact our Senators and Congressmen about the DSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. NOW I understand why they FINALLY made LYNCHING a Federal Crime!
Black reparations, my ass. These folks are afraid of a good old fashioned "necktie" party in their honor!

People who will stoop so low that they scrape the ground, think others will do the same. They are so pathetic.

Now IMPEACHMENT, there's the party I want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 04:44 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BlakeB Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Hmmm what about...?
IMPEACH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-05 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Damn right!
Impeach the Shrub!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-05 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Hi BlakeB!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. How about some LTTE's on the DSM?
methinks the time is ripe. contact your local papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
14. Kick for the Truth
Cover your ears and hum loudly = dangerous ignorance = part of the problem

Investigate fully and publicly = defending America = part of the solution

You decide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hatalles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Kick. Don't let the Rove banter stifle the DSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC