Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush for Life: GOP introduces new bill to Congress (repeal 22nd amendment)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:03 AM
Original message
Bush for Life: GOP introduces new bill to Congress (repeal 22nd amendment)
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.24.IH:

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=98437&Disp=19&Trace=on

Title: Bush for Life: GOP introduces new bill to Congress (repeal 22nd amendment)
Source: indymedia.org
URL Source: http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/06/319395.shtml
Published: Jun 14, 2005
Author: indymedia.org
Post Date: 2005-06-14 10:24:11 by Julian the Apostate
25 Comments


Bush for Life: GOP introduces new bill to Congress author: Colorado Palestine Solidarity Campaign Republicans have officially started the the campaign to amend the Constitution by repealing the 22nd Amendment - the one that confines the President to two terms. If the Republicans hold their current strength, or increase it, in the 2006 Congressional elections, expect this measure to pass allowing Bush to remain President... Republicans have officially started the the campaign to amend the Constitution by repealing the 22nd Amendment - the one that confines the President to two terms. If the Republicans hold their current strength, or increase it, in the 2006 Congressional elections, expect this measure to pass allowing Bush to remain President...

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. (Introduced in House) http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:H.J.RES.24.IH: (Notice this is on the Library of Congress server, where the current Congressional record is maintained)

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution. (Introduced in House)

HJ 24 IH 109th CONGRESS 1st Session

H. J. RES. 24 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 17, 2005

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. SABO, and Mr. PALLONE) introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the 22nd amendment to the Constitution.


Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:
------------

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. These things take time
It wouldn't be ready in time for '08 and states like California would reject for fear of a third Bush term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. WHO CARES
All it means to me is that BIG DOG gets a chance to WHIP Tipsy McDumbass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scooter24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. And that's
Edited on Sat Jun-25-05 11:11 AM by Scooter24
betting that "big dog" wants to run again. Given his life as a political consultant and speaker, plus his health, do you think he would? If not, then what? Is it worth the gamble?

And given the status of our election process as it is today, would it be even possible for him to win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. WHO CARES
All it means to me is that the BIG DOG gets to whip Tipsy McDumbass in 08!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patty Diana Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. The We Don't Need You Stinking Voters Ammendent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Fat chance...
Let see if they can get 2/3 of both houses... and THEN 3/4 of the states to ratify that.


BWA HA HA HA HA HA HA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Let 'em.
We run Bill Clinton, we win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. Two things
first I think this would exclude a sitting president at the time of passage. There was a discussion about this before.

Second - now that bush is increasingly unpopular... AND has seen all of the support for his policies drop to more unpopular than popular, were he to be "reelected" - I do think that this time you would see a Ukranian style taking it to the streets. And I have never been one to express that, or express any surprise at the lack of street action - but this - I think would be the final shift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. this indicates to me what we've been suspecting all along, they have the
voting machine thing and the theft of future elections sewn up, otherwise they'd never even begin to hope The Chimperor could win a third term if it were allowed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. So, they're flip-flopping on the 22nd Amendment?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Repeal was also mooted under Reagan...
...so it's more of a flip-flop-flip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
watercolors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. Would that mean we could
let Bill Clinton run again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. Putin's going for it, too.
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050624/ap_on_re_eu/russia_putin_2

Lawmakers are considering an electoral amendment next week that could open the way for President Vladimir Putin to run for a third term, prompting the opposition to accuse his supporters of trying to cling to power.


Putin has repeatedly said he will not change the constitution, which bars presidents from serving more than two consecutive terms.

A senior member of his United Russia party, however, submitted a legislative amendment Thursday that would allow Putin to stand for re-election if he stepped down before the end of his second term ends in March 2008, and if the next presidential poll held without his participation is declared invalid — for example, because of low turnout.

The lawmaker, Alexander Moskalets, deputy head of the lower house's constitutional legislation committee, declined to comment on the initiative, which was part of a package of electoral legislation to be voted on in its second reading Wednesday.

more...http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050624/ap_on_re_eu/russia_putin_2


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bribri16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-25-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Does it mean that the "big dog" can run again?
I'm for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC