Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If it came down to Hillary and Barbara Boxer who would you endorse?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:09 PM
Original message
If it came down to Hillary and Barbara Boxer who would you endorse?
Hillary is playing the politics game to the "T" while Boxer lets her opinions/feelings be well known.
WHO? Would you back??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Goldmund Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whom do you think?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Boxer
she has less baggage as far as I'm concerned.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. (shouldn't this be a poll?... anyway...)
My vote goes to Sluggin' Barb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TN Young Dem Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
26. Well, I'll go with the flow...
BOXER!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. Yeah, but... Doing it this way (instead of a poll)...
Makes the responses "actual and honest" because no anonymous freeps can slip in a vote or two (or 10) to throw it off.

Remember the "up or down vote" someone put regarding Bush on here the other day? Only one DU'er fessed up to being one of the :think: ... what was it.. 5 or 6 who gave the dud an "up" vote. :wtf:

At least this way, we see an actual un-freeped show of hands! :)

Oh.. and between the two choices, I'd also select Boxer! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montauk6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #36
66. Ah yes, good point, Larissa
I forgot about the ballot-stuffing angle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Go Boxer!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Boxer, without question.
she's fighting the good fight, against overwhelming odds, without being coopted by the enemy or trying to "move to center" to please everyone.
She takes her responsibility to serve the country very seriously.

in a heartbeat, Boxer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. A Man , but Boxer over Hillary
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 01:26 PM by Moochy
A Man. I hate to say it, but the whole "lets try to elect the first woman president" approach scares the hell out of me.

I'm all for electing a woman, but do we really have to try in 2008? Its a recipe for disaster, imo. Not because I'm sexist or old-fashioned, but because I'm cynical about the american electorate. I don't want to underestimate the woman hating right wing's organizing ability against Hillary, Boxer or anyone who can't be sold to racist sexist whites stuck in the wrong frame. You know, the republicans who voted for Bill Clinton?

You think they'll vote for Hillary given the lies they have successfully pushed against her?

The right needs to be able to be given a candidate they can vote for without feeling like they were wrong to hold their sexist views.
They need to feel comfortable with their protest candidate, and I guarantee that there will be less defectors from the republican party should we nominate a woman candidate for president.

In 2008, we need to be able to offer a candidate to the "Whats the matter with Kansas" republicans. Any woman will be a hard sell to people whose votes we need, and whose best interest would be served by a Democratic president.

on edit: Boxer if all the eligible male candidates die of bird flu.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elshiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
48. I agree with a lot of what you are saying, but I hope at
least Hilary runs in the primaries, if not Boxer. Just to say at least we are trying to have it be more equal.

I'd go with Boxer, but I love Hillary, too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rabid_nerd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. With no other choice, Boxer
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RethugAssKicker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Boxer
Clinton, like her husband before here is just too moderate for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTD Donating Member (732 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Boxer
While I admire her on her merits, Hillary is completely unelectable in a general election.

The Dems really need to come to terms with the fact that Hillary is just too polarizing to possibly win a general election for president. No one is neutral about her. And outside a segment of the Democratic party, she is viewed negatively by a pretty overwhelming majority of Americans.

I agree with the almost everything she's said/positions she holds. But I still view her negatively.

IMO, if she got the nomination, she'd lose by a wider margin than Mondale did back in '84.

I think the country is ready for a woman president. But it's not ready for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's see. A person or a rubber stamp for Bush's policies.
Boxer's had some bad votes but Hillary's sides with Bush most of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samdogmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Boxer!
Someone who says what she means and means what she says!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Totally Committed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. Not even close....
B O X E R ! ! !

TC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NV Whino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. BOXER!
She actually get's things done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'd pray for a conservative third party candidate is what I'd do.
Because neither of them are going to win without one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Amen
Amen to that, fellow realist :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Realism doesn't always play too well around here.
Boxer pretty much only appeals to us, and I have no faith in Hillary's ability to win over the millions of people who rabidly hate her already (oh, and unlike Bush, Hillary doesn't balance out her polarizing effect with one that sparks unity amongst us liberals). Add in, as you stated, the fact that the American people have proven themselves bigoted in the many anti-gay marriage amendments in 2004 and would not likely vote for ANY woman at this point and I think you have a recipe for disaster in nominating either of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Like it would take a lot to replace dumbo Bush? gedouddahere!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Boxer
without a doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Boxer
in a New York Minute (haha sorry Hillary)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
17. hmm...who's voted in my best interests the most? nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patty Diana Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
19. Boxer, No Doubt About It
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. Boxer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwantmycountryback Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
22. Boxer is the fantasy choice
There is no chance in hell she'd ever win a nationwide election. Fughetaboutit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Piedras Donating Member (89 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Boxer, with enthusiasm
Boxer. Proudly. With enthusiasm. Though more likely for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TriMetFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
23. I agree with Vash the Stampede..
I will vote for Boxer any day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
27. Boxer, by far a more principled and worthy candidate.
She's going in the right direction, though she does stumble on occasion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
staticstopper Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. Boxer
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
staticstopper Donating Member (314 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Hill just sends the right into
fits of rage. I don't know why, I like her and she is a great Senator but for gods sake may she not glavanise the finally cracking r-w.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. She does certainly make them mad.
Edited on Mon Jun-27-05 04:31 PM by Tiggeroshii
I don't think she's the one just for the reason she's a Clinton. Nobody will get the right acting faster than anybody who's last name is Clinton, nonetheless anybody with the first name of Hillary. It's really just her...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lojasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. Boxer, without question.
I won't vote for Hillary in the generals either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
31. Conviction politics works.
Boxer, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. Boxer, without a moment's hesitation.
And then pray like Hell that the curse of senators not being able to win Presidential elections was finally ended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. Boxer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
34. Boxer
...It's the media and the Republicans that want Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiggeroshii Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
37. It looks unanimous: Clinton!
Jusssssssst kidding!

BOXER!

:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CityDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
38. Boxer
She is more principled and carries less baggage. She would easily carry the state of California. Hillary is unpricipled and is all about politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
39. Boxer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud_Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
40. Of course - Boxer
Doesn't anyone else find it suspicious that the media has already declared Hillary as a front runner? She's okay, but not that popular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
41. Boxer....with relish!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
42. Boxer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
43. Boxer, because Hillary is sounding like a Republican, lately...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
44. Boxer - definitely Boxer
But if she tries to reauthorize the AWB, it ain't gonna be pretty.

Amendment II Democrats
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
45. Boxer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GRLMGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
46. Well, neither would win
but I love Barbara Boxer (She is my good senator, after all) and am developing a little of disdain for Senator Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catabryna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
47. Boxer
That was easy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-05 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
49. Boxer, without a question. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
50. Whichever one shows me that they could beat the GOP
Just because Hillary is moving to the middle, doesn't mean that she would be able to take on the Republican attack machine. Barbara Boxer isn't any farther left than Michael Dukakis and America liked Dukakis when the debate was still about ideas. But then the debate became about stupid shit like Willie Horton and Dukakis got creamed. We need somebody who can take whatever the GOP will throw at them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipepeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
51. Boxer n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
52. Boxer - no question about it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
53. Now give us a tough one! Boxer's soooo far ahead of the 'game'...
yet playing 'it' at the same time!

In short, Babs shoots from the hip, and Hillary is joined to the hip of the DLC...not 'we the People'...without the slightest understanding of the principles and concept of "Democrat."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zann725 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Looks like the "Boxer's" have it...hands down.
Which IS a "heads up" for BB.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clarkie1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
55. Boxer.
That's a no-brainer (very hypothetical, of course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corey_Baker08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
56. Boxer n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlakeB Donating Member (286 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. Boxer
I like Hillary and everything, but I just don't think she could win the race for President. Hopefully Wesley Clark gets the nomination, but there is definately a whole list of people I'd like to see before Clinton. That list goes something like:

Clark
Feingold
Edwards
Kerry
Obama
Biden
Boxer
Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
58. Boxer...
no offense, Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
59. Hmmm...a choice between a DLC'er and a Democrat.
Well, I'm a Democrat, so I think you can go from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madeline_con Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
60. Boxer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pinko Donating Member (64 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
61. See my sig
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barad Simith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
62. Boxer. Didn't have to think very hard about that one.
I wouldn't oppose Hillary, but I think she's a Republican wet dream because they know she has little chance of winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
63. Boxer !!!
Edited on Tue Jun-28-05 05:03 AM by WillyT


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
64. Boxer...
hands down. Without hesitation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
65. Boxer, without hesitation (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
67. Boxer. Didn't Hillary vote for the IWAR? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC