Karl Rove's New McCarthyism

[ClarkUSA]

Great framing by a Washington Post reporter who is being pretty courageous, IMO. Makes up for the pro-GOP swill that emanates from Dana Milbank....

"In the 1950s the right wing attacked liberals as being communists. In 2005 Karl Rove has attacked liberals as being therapists. Thus is born a kinder and gentler form of McCarthyism.

Named after the late Sen. Joe McCarthy, who never let the facts get in the way of his lust to charge liberals with sedition, McCarthyism has come to mean "guilt by association." What gave McCarthyism its power was the fact that the senator from Wisconsin did not invent the danger posed to the United States by Soviet communism. The Soviet Union was a real threat, and there were real communist
spies working in America.

What made McCarthy and his allies so insidious was their eagerness to level the "soft on communism" charge against even staunchly anticommunist liberals. One of them was Secretary of State Dean Acheson, an architect of Harry Truman's tough policy of containing Soviet power. In the 1952 presidential campaign, Richard Nixon pounded Democratic nominee Adlai Stevenson for earning a "PhD
from Dean Acheson's College of Cowardly Communist Containment."

Rove's instantly famous speech last week to the New York State Conservative Party should be read in light of this history and not be written off as a cheap, one-time partisan attack. On the contrary, the address by Rove, President Bush's most important adviser, provides the outlines of a sophisticated strategy aimed
at making liberals and Democrats all look soft on terrorism."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/27/AR2005062701317.html

Please take the time to write a supportive message to E.J. Dionne, Jr. at: [e-mail]