Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Environmental Conflict Industry"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 05:37 PM
Original message
"Environmental Conflict Industry"
Senator Gordon Smith is on CSPAN2 at this very moment making a case for allowing Bush's big timber friends to continue to bulldoze our national forests and he keeps calling the people trying to protect our forests the "Environmental Conflict Industry."

That is disgusting. They are such slimy bastards for manipulating our language and creating these inflammatory terms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Basically, there case is that if they don't allow their friends in big,
private lumber industry tear down our national forests, they will just burn anyway. I agree that we have to manage our forests, but why the &^%$! should they be allowed to profit from public lands to turn around and sell at high prices back to the public at Home Depot and others? It's total bullshit. If they have to saw them down, then let the public have it's resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-28-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The idea is that when forests are allowed to...
... burn (allowing fires to run their natural course) the old growth is generally not (wholly) consumed, the brush and detritus burn off. Obviously, the lumber companies are after the older growth which in the end doesn't diminish the fire destruction and often increases it---- which makes no sense unless you can get behind the fact that if you don't have any forests you can't have any forest fires
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC