Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The media is going after Dean and Clark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:56 PM
Original message
The media is going after Dean and Clark
I'm for Dean and Clark is not even my second choice, but I have to say that I have found it interesting the way the media is playing it this time around. For months prior to Iowa they daily attacked Howard Dean and as a consequence Dean suffered for it. They didn't really go after any other candidate the way they went after Dean--even after Iowa they made a rally speech into a major controversy--finally he stopped the bleeding due to a solid debate performance and even more so because of his Primetime interview with Diane Sawyer.

So now the media decided to pick another target. They choose Clark. They began by the orchestrated attacks on him for Michael Moore's statements about Bush being a deserter. They attacked his debate perfomrance. Now they are disecting why he was fired from NATO--trying to be all things to all people, ect.

It is beginnng clear to me that the media is trying to drive the two non-Washington candidtes (who have a legitimate chance for the nomination) out of the race so that it comes down to a choice between the same old Washington insiders club--Kerry vs. Edwards. The media likes to create events and beat down on candidates until they get the results they want. Now if it does come down to Kerry vs. Edwards (sorry Joe, the media loves you and you might score better than expected in NH, but you have no money and no place to really go afterward) then which of those two will the media try to defeat so they have the candidate they want to go up against their real favored choice--the boy King--George W. Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep
You're getting it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. The corporate controlled press wants Bush to run against Kerry
because he has a really liberal fiscal record. Dean is their worst nightmare because he speaks the truth on his feet well and would devour bush in the debates. They're going after clark because he has military and diplomacy credentials. I agree that Kerry has the "presidential" image, but I actually suspect the smoke and mirror bush campaign will be able to out-image him. Everyone is going for Kerry at this point mostly because they think he his the only one to beat bush. I think Dean has just as good a chance because he has been able to genuinely connect with so many people on the issues, and he usually comes up with the great new ideas before any of the other candidates catch on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. I don't think Kerry will beat Bush. At the core, Kerry is a wimp, in my
opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinkpops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I agree as well.
I watched Clark on NBC this morning. Asked about Moore he said voters are not asking, just the press. Then he went on to use his precious air time to talk about issues that are important, not an uncommon tactic. Later in the show the roundtable skewered him for not answering the question, but I say good going, Wes. Similar action on "when do you believe life begins?" He did have a hard time hedging, but they know he's pro-choice, just trying to trap him. Pro-choice means what you think is not as important as what the person who is pregnant thinks. So yes it's a set-up and he was expecting it, but had to go and take his chances in order to get his face on TV. Then they wait until the interview is over so they can slander them, tiny little hateful gnats that they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnziii Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dean is the outsider
The media spent a day and a half talking about the rumor that Dean was brining in wringers to vote for him in the Iowa Caucus.
They even interviewed Iowans about it and they said they wouldn't vote for Dean for pulling such dirty tricks.

IT WAS A RUMOR!!!!
No proof. It was started by Gephart and Kerry also got a few shots in.

IT WAS A RUMOR!!
They spent a day and a half on it.

IT WAS A RUMOR!!
And it helped kill Dean in Iowa!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxr4clark Donating Member (639 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have an opinion
which I will keep to myself. I support Clark, I'm not out to disrespect any other candidate. Not even Bush; he does that well all by himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. I don't know how any rational argument can be made which
claims that the media attacked Dean for months. For months they advertized Dean and his website, and played him up exactly as the person he claimed (at the time) to be: anti-Bush.

This helped Dean become the most popular, richest Dem candidates.

In the week before the election, NPR was still working for him. Even that night, they wouldn't cut away from TOM HARKIN at the Dean rally to hear from John Edwards who had just had a stunning second place. Even the NPR reporter was audibly shocked that her producer didn't cut to Edwards. Harkin hadn't even started speaking and they stayed to hear him.

The media is only ridiculing Dean now because he lost. They're punishing him for not winning and they're smearing the primary poster boy as a way to discredit the whole process.

If the media couldn't elevate a patsy for Bush to run agianst, now they will try to smear all those who remain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Dean's words were twisted re Saddam, Usama, and more before Iowa vote (nt)
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. The media helped dry up Kerry and Edwards' fundraising by declaring them
irrelevant and dead for months.

They ENRICHED Dean in every way possible for most of last year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. AP, wouldn;t you agree they have beens balls on to get Clark...
lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I agree with you. That's the same pattern they followed with Kerry.
Too many didn't care when it was Kerry being maligned by the press and the media ignoring Edwards and Kucinich.

Well, we see what's happening, and sympathize, but the supporters shouldn't pretend it's Kerry's fault. Kerry and Edwards got where they are in SPITE of the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamrsilva Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. They are trying to destroy the two best candidates
Plain and simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-NAFTA Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dean is a martyr of a politician.
I have never supported his campaign at all, but his crucifixion by the media is heartrending to say the least. I guess that's what happens when the media has a vested interest in a certain candidate winning

http://www.rense.com/general48/topten.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. um...I'd hardly say the media were attacking Dean
months before Iowa.

Maybe days before, but certainly not months before.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anti-NAFTA Donating Member (900 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The higher you climb
the harder you fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Dean and Clark Both Make Contrarian Arguments
that our corporate masters are uncomfortable airing for debate to us unwashed masses.

they'd much rather we discuss Michael Jackson than whether or not we want our nation to be a soul-sucking empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. You are very astute. It has been all out assault on Clark and Dean...
Believe it or not, it has been an all assault or all out ignore
on Clark since September.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loren645 Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. The outsiders. With no track record of compromising in congress
They know Kerry and Edwards and Lieberman will go along to get along.
They did just that on IWR and Patriot Act.
Gotta boost the boys in the club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. I've tried to tell Clark people it was coming.
Sadly, many chose to believe it wouldn't happen to him. Now I would like to tell the Kerry and Edwards folks the same thing--- they WILL be coming for your guy NEXT! *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC