Subject: CODEX VITAMIN GUIDELINE RAMMED DOWN OUR THROATS TODAY IN ROME- WE
MUST KILL CAFTA TO STOP US FROM BEING HARMONIZED TO CODEX
> IAHF Webmaster: Codex Emergency, Breaking News, Anti CAFTA, All Countries,
> What to Do:
>
> IAHF List:
>
> John Hammell will be on the air tonight, July 4th at 7 PM Pacific, 10 PM
> Eastern Time on Web based World Wide First Amendment Radio
>
http://www.wwfar.com/ As guest of Darren Weeks. You will need Winamp
> installed to listen on the web, and can also listen via satellite at
> Galaxy 13 Channel 16, Sub-Audio 7.70
>
> The nightmare scenario which IAHF first warned the world about in 1996
> came true today at the 28th General Session of the
Codex Alimentarius when
> the global trade guideline for vitamins and minerals was RATIFIED (with
> nary a whimper of protest from US Codex Manager Dr.Ed Scarbrough, our
> traitorous delegate.) (See Press Release below my comments by Diane Miller
> who is in Rome.)
>
> SEE WHAT TO DO BELOW:
WE MUST KILL CAFTA TO STOP CODEX FROM COMING HERE:
>
> THE SHELL GAME CONTINUES------> CODEX RATIFIED AN EMPTY SHELL
>
> What Codex ratified was a FRAMEWORK with the blanks on allowable potencies
> to be filled in next November at the Codex Committee on Nutrition and
> Foods for Special Dietary Use Meeting in Bonn.
>
> How they intend to fill in those blanks, however, is highly predictable
> given that the World Health Organization's "Nutrient Risk Assessment
> Project" is being "led" by an FDA employee: Christine Lewis Taylor, a
> dietician who firmly believes that taking any nutrient above RDA levels
> merely "enriches the urine.">
>
The Pharma Dominated vitamin trade associations have conned their vitamin
> company and health food store members into thinking that "SOUND SCIENCE"
> would be used to fill in the blanks on allowable potencies, and that a
> "victory" was won when a move to scrap RDAs as the basis for filling in
> the blanks was replaced by a move to base them on "scientific" risk
> assessment instead.> (See CRN Press Release
http://www.crnusa.org/PR04_110204jointCodex.html)
>
>
But just how "scientific" is it in FACT when they're only looking at
> presumed "RISKS" while ignoring BENEFITS? The Pharma Dominated trade
> associations have conned their members into believing that the END POINT
> of the Codex risk assessment would be the "SUL"S or "Safe Upper Levels"
> generated by the US National Academy of Sciences. These numbers aren't
> much different from the potencies that vitamin companies are currently
> allowed to sell in the USA so vitamin companies have easily bought into
> this LIE.>
>
The awful REALITY, however is that the SULs are only the STARTING point
> for this most unscientific risk assessment, because the fine print calls
> for them to be further watered down til by subtracting junk science
> derived "nutrient risk factors" and junk science derived numbers from some
> mythical "average diet" which doesn't in fact exist, you end up with a the
> numbers generated by the German Federal Institute of Risk Assessment show
> in this table, which as you can see in some cases are even LOWER than the
> RDAs:
>
http://www.alliance-natural-health.org/_docs/ANHWebsiteDoc_145.doc>
> The UK based Alliance for Natural Health sees all of this, and in an
> effort to head it off commissioned the Dutch based HAN Foundation to do a
> PROPERLY SCIENTIFIC risk assessment which takes into account the BENEFIT
> of dietary supplements, which the so called World Health Organization is
> outrageously IGNORING completely:
>
http://www.alliance-natural-health.org/index.cfm?action=news&ID=174>
>
Judging from what just happened in Rome, however, no vitamin consumer in
> America can count on Codex paying the least bit of attention to the HAN
> Foundation's findings however when Codex meets next in November. We have
> to assume the worst- that they'll fill in the blanks on allowable
> potencies exactly the way the FDA would want them to, which is of course
> just the way the German government would like as seen in the table above.>
>
WHY WE MUST KILL CAFTA ON THE HOUSE FLOOR- HOW CAFTA TIES IN WITH CODEX
>
> CAFTA VOTE - ANYTIME AFTER CONGRESS RECONVENES ON JULY 11th
>
> WE MUST NOT ALLOW CAFTA AND CODEX TO OVERRIDE DSHEA >
>
>
The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) Treaty will require the
> U.S., a member of the World Trade Organization, to revise our food laws
> and regulations based on Codex decisions. CAFTA would force harmonization
> of our dietary supplements and regulations to international standards,
> overriding the DSHEA Act of 1994.
>
> The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) and the even-broader
> Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) are both modelled after the
> North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). These agreements are typical
> bureaucratic monstrosities of "managed" trade that masquerade as free
> trade and would expand NAFTA to include first Central America and then the
> rest of the Americas in an economic "union." True free trade would take a
> few pages of written text to enact ("eliminate these barriers to trade and
> these tariffs," etc.); all three of these agreements encompass thousands
> of pages of bureaucratic textual garbage sprinkled liberally with rules,
> regulations, and special-interest benefits.
>
>
Buried in the language of CAFTA is Section 6 that would require of all its
> members that they form a Sanitary and Phyto-Sanitary (SPS) committee for
> the purpose of insuring ongoing harmonization under the terms of the SPS
> Agreement in the World Trade Organization (WTO). You can find that text
> at the following website:>
>
http://www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/CAFTA/CAFTA-DR_Final_Texts/Section_Index.html.>
>
>
If you then look at Article 3 of the WTO's SPS Agreement, you will read
> the following words: "To harmonize sanitary and phytosanitary measures on
> as wide a basis as possible, Members shall base their food safety measures
> on international standards, guidelines or recommendations." (emphasis
> added) And as you all know by now, Codex sets the international standards
> for food safety including vitamins & minerals.
>
> So, CAFTA, which is set for a vote in the House of Representatives any
> time after they reconvene July 11th, 2005, is another critical link by
> which health-freedom haters hope to bypass the Dietary Supplement Health
> and Education Act of 1994 and obligate the United States and Canada by
> treaty to harmonize to the harshly restrictive Codex vitamin-and-mineral
> standards. They cannot be allowed to succeed, and we at the NHF completely
> oppose these two treaties that would put a knife in the back of our health
> freedoms.>
>
> *********************
>
>
> ~CAFTA has already passed the Senate in a 54 to 45 vote on July 1st, 2005.
> ~Legislators have just recessed for one week, reconvening July 11, 2005.
> ~IMPORTANT- For House consideration, when they return, the Senate Bill
> 1307 (click here
>
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/D?c109:3:./temp/~c109OjRqbt:: to view
> bill), ratifying CAFTA, can be voted on without going to committee. It is
> on the House calendar and may be brought up at any time.
>
>
> *********************
>
>
> CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES. URGE THEM TO VOTE AGAINST CAFTA NOW.
>
> YOUR LETTERS WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE. THE VOTING IN THE HOUSE WILL BE
> CLOSE. WE MIGHT ONLY HAVE ONE WEEK TO FLOOD THEIR OFFICES WITH CAFTA
> OPPOSITION LETTERS.
>
> PLEASE JOIN IN THIS EFFORT AND CONTACT YOUR REPRESENTATIVES.
>
>
> Contact any member of the House of Representatives via
>
http://www.house.gov/writerep/>
> LETTER TO USE:
>
> Dear Congressman______________________
>
> In 1994 vitamin consumers generated the largest volume of mail to Congress
> on any issue in the HISTORY of Congress when we passed the Dietary
> Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994.
>
> Today, CAFTA threatens to undo all of our hard work, and to set the USA up
> for harmonization to an excessively restrictive global trade guideline for
> vitamins and minerals just finalized on July 4th 2005 at the 28 General
> Session of the UN's Codex Alimentarius Commission.
>
> The seeds of our health freedom destruction are sewn inside Section 6 of
> CAFTA where members are forced to form a Sanitary-Phytosanitary Measures
> (SPS) Committee for the purpose of insuring ONGOING HARMONIZATION of our
> laws under the terms of the SPS Agreement in the WTO Trade Agreement. (See
>
http://www.ustr.gov/Trade_Agreements/Bilateral/CAFTA/CAFTA-DR_Final_Texts/Section_Index.html>
> If you examine Article 3 of the WTO's SPS Agreement you will read the
> following words: "To harmonize sanitary and phytosanitary measures on as
> wide a basis as possible, members SHALL base their food safety measures on
> international standards, guidelines or recommendations."
>
> (Codex sets the international standard for food safety, and they intend to
> fill in the blanks on allowed potencies at levels even LOWER than RDAs-
> see
http://www.alliance-natural-health.org/_docs/ANHWebsiteDoc_145.doc>
> Vitamin consumers drove many congressmen out of office who failed to vote
> for DSHEA in '94.
> Any member of Congress who fails to heed our concerns about CAFTA and
> votes for this unconstitutional trade agreement anyway, despite how it
> sets us up for harmonization to Codex, and despite its continuing the
> failed policies of NAFTA which gave us our present $617 Billion trade
> deficit risks being driven from office. IAHF will be posting a list of any
> member of Congress who ignores our concerns. We urge you to watch Kevin
> Miller's excellent documentary on this issue at
http://www.welltv.com>
> Signed____________________
> Address____________________________
>
> PRESS RELEASE ON WHAT JUST HAPPENED TODAY AT CODEX
>
> Subject: Press Release - National Health Freedom Coalition: Codex Full
> Commission adopts Codex Guidelines
>
> Press Release - National Health Freedom Coalition: Codex Full
> Commission adopts Codex Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food
> Supplements in final form July 4, 2005, Rome Italy.
>
> by Diane Miller JD
>
> Minutes ago the full Commission of Codex Alimentarius adopted in final
> form, the Codex Guidelines for Vitamin and Mineral Food Supplements.
> This adoption is the Step 8 adoption, the final stage of adoption for
> the international Codex guidelines. The Codex Vitamin and Mineral
> Food Supplements guidelines are now official and no longer in draft
> form.
>
> The Commission, attended by over 85 of the 171 Codex countries,
> adopted the guidelines by consensus method. There was brief
> discussion before adoption taking in comments from a small number of
> countries and two NGOs.
>
> Australia requested adding the word "only" in Section 1.3 bertwee the
> words "apply" and "in". The sentence would then read "These
> guidelines apply only in those jurisdictions where products defined in
> 2.1 are regulated as foods."
>
> Australia's comments were followed by request from Venzuela and Spain
> to clarify the spanish translation.
>
> Venezuela was followed by China. China stated that every government
> in making decisions about vitamins and minerals should take into
> account the dietary limitations of their own countries, that
> governments can select vitamins and minerals acocording to the customs
> and habits of their country. China also pointed out that there should
> be definitions of the sources of vitamins.
>
> Columbia spoke up and commented that Vitamins and Minerals are
> intended for deficiencies and are recommended for health reasons and
> said that there has to be no exaggerated use of minerals.
>
> Egypt commented and offered a clarification saying that vitamin and
> minerals can be considered if daily needs are not being met.
>
> After the countries were heard, the Chairman recognized NGOs
> (Non-Governmental Organizations). National Health Federation (NHF) a
> world wide consumer organization with NGO status at Codex was
> recognized to speak. Attonery Scott Tipps of NHF stood and requested
> the guidelines not be adopted but rather be sent back to commitee for
> 3 important reasons. 1) According to Codex rules a "purpose"
> statement must be part of all guidelines adopted and the Vitamin and
> Mineral guidelines did not contain a purpose. Secondly,the guidelines
> did not define vitamin and mineral and therefore it is unclear as to
> what is being regulated. And lastly, he pointed out that the Chinese
> comments were substantive and according to Codex rules on page 27 of
> the procedural manual, a substantive amendment request should be
> addressed at the committee level. His comments were heard.
>
> The NGO IADSA was then recognized. IADSA stressed the fact that the
> draft guidelines should be adopted because they had been worked on in
> committee for near 10 years and that valuable consensus had been
> reached in the Bonn Germany committee meeting and the guidelines
> should now be passed.
>
> After all comments, the Chair, consulted with counsel to assess
> whether the addition of the word "only" would change the meaning of
> the sentence. After learning that it would not he consulted with
> Australia and Australia repeated their request for amendment. The
> Chair recommended adoption of the amendment and there was no dissent.
> Then the Chair recommended the guidelines be adopted at Stage 8 in
> their final form and that China submit their substantive amendment
> requests to the committee at their next meeting. There was no further
> comment or dissent from any country and the guidelines were adopted.
> --------
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For Health Freedom,
> John C. Hammell, President
> International Advocates for Health Freedom
> 556 Boundary Bay Road
> Point Roberts, WA 98281-8702 USA
>
http://www.iahf.com> jham@iahf.com
> 800-333-2553 N.America
> 360-945-0352 World