Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What have Dems done about paper trails for touch-screen voting?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ladeuxiemevoiture Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 10:48 AM
Original message
What have Dems done about paper trails for touch-screen voting?
Is there anything being done about requiring paper confirmations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliTeacher Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well in California...
I went to the Diebold certification hearings, and they said the new machines here would have a voter verifiable paper record kept behind a plastic window. The downside is that the record is on a scroll, so it's sequential and you could conceivably figure out who cast which vote. So much for anonymity. The real problem is that the software is still proprietary, so you don't know if the votes are really getting counted in the first place. A paper trail only helps if you actually get a recount, and recent history is not very encouraging on that front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladeuxiemevoiture Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. True, but I suppose something is better than nothing
as far as actually having a paper trail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliTeacher Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. Also...
Edited on Fri Jul-08-05 10:54 AM by CaliTeacher
...there was no paper trail for voters with disabilities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Exactly, using touchscreen machines is faith based voting. Also, random
mandatory recounts of the paper trail are required in each election--to verify that what is being reported to and out of the "mother computer" is the actual count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. every state that allows voting by mail has a paper trail. Trouble is,
people will not use it. They will vote on the election day. I would really like to see a summary of laws passed by states or in the works.
Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
6. Recommendations from Dr. Wallach at recent Carter-Baker FER Hearings
Recommendations from Dr. Dan Wallach:

-Paperless DRE systems are insecure
-Many documented vulnerabilities
-Ballots should be on paper
-Electronic records are too fragile

-Best voting system today:
precinct-based optical scan

-ID cards are the tip of an iceberg
-Networked registration systems need additional study

http://www.american.edu/ia/cfer/0630test/wallach.pdf

Dan Wallach is an associate professor at Rice University in the department of computer science, and also manages Rice's computer security lab. His research focuses on computer security and other areas of computer systems, such as wireless systems and secure software systems for the Internet. Dr. Wallach's pioneering efforts led to the development and standardization of the "stack inspection" security model, now used by Sun, Microsoft, and many other systems. He received his M.A. and Ph.D. from Princeton University.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ysolde Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And it's so funny...
we've had precinct-based optical scan in OK (of all places) for as long as I can remember (I've been voting since 1982). It still has problems in that the central tabulating computer can easily be tampered with, but random recounts could easily catch that. So why do we need something else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-08-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. You'll be hearing more about this from the DNC
The State Party leadership is talking about this.

In Maine, by the way, it's against state law to have a voting machine WITHOUT a verifiable paper backup. This was passed by our Democratic majority legislature last term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC