Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chimpy repeats "Fight 'em abroad, so we won't fight 'em at home."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 11:49 AM
Original message
Chimpy repeats "Fight 'em abroad, so we won't fight 'em at home."
From this article, linked on LBN:
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N09269668.htm

Bush said the London attacks were a reminder of the "evil" of the Sept. 11 attacks and underscored that the United States and its allies were fighting a "global war on terror."

"We will stay on the offense, fighting the terrorists abroad so we do not have to face them at home," Bush said.


(snip)
Bush was scheduled to visit the FBI training academy at Quantico, Virginia, on Monday to deliver a speech discussing the London attacks, said White House spokesman Scott McClellan.

"I expect he will talk about the strategy for winning the war on terrorism," McClellan said. "He'll talk about (how) in the short term, it's taking the fight to the enemy abroad and in the long term it's spreading freedom and democracy to defeat the extremist ideology of hatred and oppression."


There are so many things factually wrong with this, it's hard to know where to start.

First, he's NOT fighting terrorism "globally."
Second, the London attacks SHOW that "fighting terrorists abroad" does nothing to stop them from attacking here.
Third, the "long term" strategy isn't going to work as long as the "short-term" strategy keeps making the situation WORSE.


"Now watch this drive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. It might just as well be "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the
blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints", "show me all the blueprints",
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. How much will Blair take?
I imagine Blair thinks London is home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
16.  Unfortunately, I think we already know the answer to that question.
Edited on Sat Jul-09-05 08:13 PM by flpoljunkie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. More last throes, got 'em on the run smoking 'em out, another corner turn
Isn't England "home"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
methinks2 Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. *ush is so full of **it. The London attacks
are proof that taking the fight to the bad guys in *raq doesn't work.
It's the occupation stupid! Jeez.
Here's a link to an excellent article on terrorism and the causes.

http://amconmag.com/2005_07_18/article.html
The Logic of Suicide Terrorism

snip
"TAC: That would seem to run contrary to a view that one heard during the American election campaign, put forth by people who favor Bush’s policy. That is, we need to fight the terrorists over there, so we don’t have to fight them here.

RP: Since suicide terrorism is mainly a response to foreign occupation and not Islamic fundamentalism, the use of heavy military force to transform Muslim societies over there, if you would, is only likely to increase the number of suicide terrorists coming at us."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Terrorists can't multi-task. Don't you know that?
Edited on Sat Jul-09-05 12:39 PM by oxbow
we have em pinned down in Iraq. Sure, it only took 20 guys to bring down the two towers, the pentagon and (almost) the capitol. But we're doing so well in Iraq that they can't spare a single terrorist these days.

stupid liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Exactly -- the "Whack-a-Mole" approach to terrorism.
There are nine of them. You whack 'em all, you win, you're done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. They have US pinned down in Iraq!
Clearly, we are the ones stuck to the flypaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Yeah, using our young people in the military as "bait"
Sucks!


Young Republicans: Fighting the war at home so they don't have to fight them abroad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. yep. Too dangerous to even fly soldiers corpses out of there these days
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 12:15 PM by oxbow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. 19 guys
almost managed to hit 4 targets simultaneously. Whereas we can't get our acts together to find one dude, or fight in 2 quagmires at once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud_Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm sick of hearing this
Do the families of the fallen or maimed soldiers feel comforted that they lost them in Iraq or Afghan rather than at home? Why is the United States so arrogant to believe that its great to blow up innocent people, their homes and infra-structures in a different country as long as these atrocities aren't happening right under our noses? It's wrong, it's wrong, it's wrong no matter where it's happening.

And I might add that Bush is doing nothing to safeguard our bounders and keep it overseas. In fact, the Iraq bounders are wide open too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. We deserve a President who can bring real honor and integrity to the WH-
not this corrupt and incompetent man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. btw- I love the chimp pic! nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dajoki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. sounds like a broken record
he was taught what to say and told to keep repeating it. has no thoughts of his own.:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
10. So it is ok to bomb an ally as long as it isn't on American soil?
It is just a matter of time. Anyone who thinks we are invulnerable to an attack is foolish. History would tell us that they are probably plotting an American attack as we speak. And if the Brits had no forewarning, what makes us think that we will. I suggest that our homeland security is worse that the UK's. Particularly in places that are likely targets where the administration has sorely underfunded protection measures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dear Mr. Bush.
Would you perhaps mind fighting your terrorists in someone else's country? Perhaps France. Or maybe Belgium.

Sweden?

Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
splat@14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. "bring `em on", I guess only means to a certain point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Could the Chimp stay abroad so we don't have to see him at
home?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Sweet Christ NO...
We'll have no allies left after 2008 if we don't bring Bobo the chimp faced boy home soon and slap a muzzle on the little prick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. Bush is still a local Texas politician - not an international statesman
Everything he says is geared towards local public consumption and his ratings in the polls. He apparently doesn't care what the world thinks. When he talks about "home", he's only addressing his local base and is unconcerned with the image of America in the eyes of the rest of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. Why don't more people comment on this???
Seriously, there should be a public outcry every time he utters these words. This is one of the most vile and disgusting things a person can say -- basically that our troops are bait.

Damn these people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
21. The awful truth.....
The "Bad Guys" are actually calling the shots. While the rest of Europe waits with sweat building on their foreheads, the plotters plan.

They act, we react. They can pick any venue for their next attack. All we can do is wait. There is really no effective way to protect citizens against bombing attacks.

Bush and Blair can feel comfortable, knowing they have protection 24/7 and it's just ordinary folks that are being blown up.

But....THEY are the ones who will finally say they've had enough, and throw the bums out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silvershadow Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
22. Every time he says this, I cringe...
I suppose this may make sense as a strategy, but don't you think it is ridiculous to state this publicly? It is like saying to the Iraqi people that we prefer to use YOUR homeland to fight OUR enemies. (Which IS what we are doing). You would think they would or will get tired of it very soon. What a nightmare this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBHagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. But it does not make sense as a strategy.
Bush is using pollster Frank Luntz's talking points. See link:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54906-2004Jun19.html

Bush's claim makes no sense logically or strategically, because his policies have increased animosity towards the U.S. overseas, not reduced it. Moreover, the September 11th, London, Madrid, Bali, and Turkey attacks show we ARE vulnerable over here, and the war in Iraq hasn't changed that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silvershadow Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I guess I shouln't have said that...I
didn't necessarily mean it. I was rushing my thoughts. More accurately I should have said "Even if it did make sense as a strategy".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
23. The Chimp only thinks in terms of "fighting them over there",
but unfortunately for the people in Iraq and those of us in Britain, his "over there" is our "over here".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dutchdoctor Donating Member (306 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
27. We're training them abroad so they can better strike us at home n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
29. The definition of "abroad" gets broader every day, doesn't it?
Edited on Mon Jul-11-05 08:57 PM by elperromagico
The idea that, as they didn't attack the United States, we're beating terrorism is an idea that flies in the face of facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-11-05 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
30. words of a coward.
period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC