Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iran joins Iraq.100 Members of Iraqi parliament demand US Out of Iraq NOW.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 03:02 PM
Original message
Iran joins Iraq.100 Members of Iraqi parliament demand US Out of Iraq NOW.
Edited on Sat Jul-09-05 03:02 PM by cyberpj
Headlines : International
Iraq Signs Military Pact with Iran
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 22:11:20 -0700Summary:

Here’s an update: The “democratically elected” government of Iraq, much-ballyhooed by the Bush adminstration and its toadies, has signed an agreement of military cooperation with current Bush public enemy number one, Iran.

In other news, 100 “democratically elected” members of the Iraqi parliament have signed a petition demanding that the US withdraw its forces from Iraq immediately.



By Neil MacDonald in Baghdad and Najmeh Bozorgmehr in Tehran
Republished from Financial Times

Iraq signs a pact in Tehran agreeing to accept Iranian military training and other cooperation.

Former foes Iraq and Iran announced “a new chapter” in their relations on Thursday, including cross-border military co-operation, dismissing US concerns about Iranian regional meddling.

On his first official visit to Tehran, Iraqi minister of defence Saadoun al-Dulaimi asserted his country’s sovereign right to seek help from wherever it sees fit in rebuilding its defence capabilities.

“Nobody can dictate to Iraq its relations with other countries,” Mr Dulaimi said in a joint press conference with his Iranian counterpart, Admiral Ali Shamkhani.

The two ministers said that a military co-operation agreement, now in the preparation, would include Iranian help with training and upgrading Iraq’s reconstituted armed forces, a process so far overseen by US and coalition advisers.

http://www.gnn.tv/headlines/3670/Iraq_Signs_Military_Pact_with_Iran
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. OMG, this is hilarious. Hilarious and sooooo poetically just. What is
the little goose stepping buffoon going to say now? The Iraqis siding up with Iran demanding he get the troops out. The Iraqis who won in his much touted election, you know, the historical one (as he tried to make is sound that Iraq had never had an election of any kind before).

Sometimes the irony is just to beautiful to put into words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. My worry is that he'll actually go nuclear on both of em. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And he's just unstable enough to do just that. Let's all hope and pray
that if the squatter in the White House ever goes for the nuclear football that someone knocks his ass cold before he can do any damage.

Does anyone really think that the military will start letting nukes fly if this crazy bastard gives the order? I don't know the answer to that. That's why I'm asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Theyr're going to have to Baker Act his sorry little ass... I'm sure of it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I would have thought he would have been locked up for his (and our)
own protection long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. What is that? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Lock him up for his own safety and for the safety of the people
around him... forcibly. He would have no choice in the matter if someone Baker Acted him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. That day is coming (soon?): majority of Iraq parliament votes "US get out"
That would push him over the edge, I'm sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Is 100 member a majority? I need to look that up. Not a word in news. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. 275 members in Iraqi Parliament - Here's a FAQ:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. Reuters article -- this one also appears on LATimes -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is the absolutely last thing the neo-cons wanted
The Iraqi-Syrian alliance was one of the reason they thought "Saddam had to go", and now the "New Iraq" has gone and signed an alliance with the new hardliner government in Iran instead. What comes around goes around, assholes. It's not like saner voices didn't predict this three years ago. I read somewhere else that the new deal entailed $1 billion worth of Iranian military aid to Iraq...

And, as the Ayatollah Khomeini once said, there ain't a damn thing you can do about it.

That doesn't mean they won't try though, which is the scary part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You're so right. And scarier still, the thought that it's just what they
wanted so they can take 'em all on at once instead of little by little. They may feel the alliance just gives them a bigger (hey US...now it's scarier! Booga-booga!) excuse to expand operations, DOD money and Halliburton profits, er, operations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-05 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bush and Blair had to know this was coming. Why else were we suddenly
going to pull out of Iraq in 9 months after Rumsliar was saying it could be 24 years before we leave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC