I have had ENOUGH

[GURUving]

I am far from being amused by the easy way people throw around rumours and innuendo around here.

Get your shit together.

Who are you fighting against? If you tear down the democratic candidates enough, then you might as well vote for Lieberman or Nader.

Go ahead. Screw up any chance for change.

You think by tearing the dems apart you are doing anyone a favor?

You are destroying the remnants of democracy.

STop it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dean is this and Kerry is that and Edwards is the other thing, and damn if they didn't fuck up this or that or the other.

STOP IT!

[lastknowngood]

1. No chance half of them are freepers anyway.

n/t

[wyldwolf]

2. No they're not

[Padraig18]

3. They might a well be.

Their talking points are the same ones the RNC fax-blasts to all the dittoheads.

[wyldwolf]

4. doesn't make them freepers

The term shouldn't be tossed around like that.

[Padraig18]

6. I didn't say it did.

It does, however, show that they share the same scorched-earth mentality.

[blm]

11. True...but Pad has a point.

.

[stopbush]

5. Pot, kettle. Kettle, pot.

You wrote: "Who are you fighting against? If you tear down the democratic candidates enough, then you might as well vote for Lieberman or Nader."

May I remind you that Lieberman is still in the Dem race and that he has his supporters here on DU? Or were you attempting a joke?

In any case, you should follow your own advice if for nothing else than the sake of consistency.

[WillyBrandt]

7. Lieberman is fair game

He's got a candidacy based upon attacking other Democrats and supporting President Bush.

[IndianaGreen]

12. At least Lieberman has been consistent

and he can show intellectual integrity because he wanted Saddam out on human rights grounds, not because he believed in anything that Bush told him about IWR.

[stopbush]

13. Lieberman's not my guy,

but if you're going to go down the "fair game" road for "attacking other Democrats and supporting President Bush," then I can think of a few other candidates (and their supporters) who shouldn't throw stones, including Dean, Kerry, Clark and Sharpton.

And declaring any candidate *fair game* rather negates the message of the original post, doesn't it?

[incapsulated]

10. Hey

Lieberman is the only thing we all seem to agree on, we should thank him for that! :)

[incapsulated]

8. This is a love-fest

compared to what it was like before the new "new rules".

[Padraig18]

9. Ain't that the truth!

:P