Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do you think of this Clark shadow cabinet?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 08:56 PM
Original message
What do you think of this Clark shadow cabinet?
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 08:57 PM by WillyBrandt
Suppose Clark wins the nomination. What do you think of the idea of him setting up the following shadow cabinet, so he's got a team of warrior on his side attacking Bush? Set this up right away after getting the nom, set up messages, and let them out on the prowl.

President - Wesley Clark
Vice-President - Howard Dean
Attorney General - John Edwards
Secretary of State - Richard Holbrooke
UN Ambassador - Carol Mosely Braun
Secretary of Treasury - Paul Krugman

I can't think of any for SecDef, and I'm sure I'm missing many more...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. A 'shadow' cabinet is the out-of-power party's members who are designated
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 09:05 PM by AP
as experts on the cabinet positions, and, presumably, would be appointed in those positions if their party won election.

Why would Clark have a cabinet and then a shadow cabinet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, I know we do not have a Westminster system of government
Thank you very much.

It was a useful shorthand for a group of people who would be thrown into power were Clark to be elected. There isn't a proper correlate in the American usage, so I offer my humble apologies for appropriating the British term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Furthermore, does anyone ever remember a president selecting his cabinet
Edited on Sun Jan-25-04 09:05 PM by AP
from the people he beat to reach the presidency. Just by virtue of the fact that these people are running AGAINST each other suggests they're from different camps and teams.

You have three primary opponents in that cabinet. It would be highly unlikely if any of these candidates appointed ONE of their opponents to anything other than an ambassadorship in a far off country.

Incidentally, I bet Holbrooke is on the very short list of any candidtate other than Kerry and Clark for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. There is little presedence, and that's why I thought it an
interesting question. By doing something unusual and by picking a team in advance, he not only speeds things up once in power, but essntially constructs a campaign team of powerful personalities that he can use on the trail. Disclosure: I first read about this idea at Altercation.

Moreover, I think you overstate the power of intra-party enmity. As much as mud has flung, it has thus far been relatively clean, and doesn't preclude this from occuring. Remember: in the far nastier Bush-Reagan race, Reagan picked up Bush as his VP.

As to Holbrooke, I deeply doubt he'll be VP. As far as I know, he's not a hobnobbing politician. I do think he's at the top of everyone's list for Secretary of State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Ronald Reagan and George Bush Sr. ran against each
other in the primaries.

I think the best way for the eventual nominee to keep up interest in his campaign into November would be to choose one of the other candidates for his running mate. That way the workers and organization of the running mate would already be in place and the workers would not be disheartened and just stay at home on election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laura888 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. yeah! Krugman for Treasury!
he's the greatest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. you forgot one...
...and press secretary Al Sharpton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyBrandt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-25-04 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Absolutely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC