Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove's attorney: "By any definition, he (Matt Cooper) burned Karl Rove"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:28 AM
Original message
Rove's attorney: "By any definition, he (Matt Cooper) burned Karl Rove"
July 12, 2005, 4:26 p.m.
Lawyer: Cooper “Burned” Karl Rove
Rove’s attorney talks to NRO.

http://www.nationalreview.com/york/york200507121626.asp

The lawyer for top White House adviser Karl Rove says that Time reporter Matthew Cooper "burned" Rove after a conversation between the two men concerning former ambassador Joseph Wilson's fact-finding mission to Niger and the role Wilson's wife, CIA employee Valerie Plame, played in arranging that trip. Nevertheless, attorney Robert Luskin says Rove long ago gave his permission for all reporters, including Cooper, to tell prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald about their conversations with Rove.

In an interview with National Review Online, Luskin compared the contents of a July 11, 2003, internal Time e-mail written by Cooper with the wording of a story Cooper co-wrote a few days later. "By any definition, he burned Karl Rove," Luskin said of Cooper. "If you read what Karl said to him and read how Cooper characterizes it in the article, he really spins it in a pretty ugly fashion to make it seem like people in the White House were affirmatively reaching out to reporters to try to get them to them to report negative information about Plame."

Luskin told NRO that the circumstances of Rove's conversation with Cooper undercut Time's suggestion of a White House "war on Wilson." According to Luskin, Cooper originally called Rove — not the other way around — and said he was working on a story on welfare reform. After some conversation about that issue, Luskin said, Cooper changed the subject to the weapons of mass destruction issue, and that was when the two had the brief talk that became the subject of so much legal wrangling. According to Luskin, the fact that Rove did not call Cooper; that the original purpose of the call, as Cooper told Rove, was welfare reform; that only after Cooper brought the WMD issue up did Rove discuss Wilson — all are "indications that this was not a calculated effort by the White House to get this story out."

"Look at the Cooper e-mail," Luskin continues. "Karl speaks to him on double super secret background...I don't think that you can read that e-mail and conclude that what Karl was trying to do was to get Cooper to publish the name of Wilson's wife." Nor, says Luskin, was Rove trying to "out" a covert CIA agent or "smear" her husband. "What Karl was trying to do, in a very short conversation initiated by Cooper on another subject, was to warn Time away from publishing things that were going to be established as false." Luskin points out that on the evening of July 11, 2003, just hours after the Rove-Cooper conversation, then-CIA Director George Tenet released a statement that undermined some of Wilson's public assertions about his report. "Karl knew that that (Tenet) statement was in gestation," says Luskin. "I think a fair reading of the e-mail was that he was trying to warn Cooper off from going out on a limb on (Wilson's) allegations."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pachamama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Whoa! I'm dizzy! So much spinning going on, I can hardly stand it!
Spin spin spin spin spin...

whoa! the lawyers and public relations guru's for Bush's Brain are working overtime....

They must be awfully worried, eh? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. This is like Bill Frist equating opposition to the GOP "agenda"...
...with "religious persecution."

These folks have no shame, they have no scruples, and it's utterly beyond belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okoboji Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. I am so confused here......
what does this all have to do with anything? Wasn't Robert Novak the guy that actually named Wilson's wife? and long before Cooper had done anything?

and what has Cooper actually written?

why isn't anyone going after Novak?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Nope! Rove burned his own self
hang him high, he's a traitor!

It's the same old, same spin from the Repropagandist Party of no new ideas......b-o-r-i-n-g!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Oh. So NOW the crime is that "negative information" about Plame was put
out. Luskin's a bad joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yep, spinning like crazy - I guess the new thing is to dump all over
Cooper, in the hopes we'll all forget it was Novak who first mentioned Plame. They're beginning to stumble on all the skeins of bullcrap they're putting out there. "The original purpose of the call was welfare reform"...Um...right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. Poor Karl....
His brain must be exhausted having to think for two people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julius Civitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. Night is day. Black is white.
Orwellian liars. They sure have some chutzpah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scout1071 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
8. Not a good idea to start smearing someone the day before they
testify.

Wonder if Matt Cooper really starts singing today before the Grand Jury. Now that he himself is squarely in the smear cross hairs of the Rove machine, he may really start to tell the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC