Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On CSPAN now; Should WH continue to back Rove

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Nightwing Donating Member (489 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:40 AM
Original message
On CSPAN now; Should WH continue to back Rove
About to take calls on the subject. Should be very interesting to see what the public thinks on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thx for the heads up. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Credibility crisis for Rove and the WH
It is and for the WH to (in their eyes) return their credibility, then they have no choice but to fire KKKarl.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. A couple of rw's called in - the talking point seems to be
Plame was working a desk job, so the law against identifying an agent doesn't apply!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. The CIA disagrees
It doesn't matter what capacity she was working in at the time the leak was made. Heck, she could have just been on in-house assignment until her next undercover gig came up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Just thought I'd mention what I heard because 2 callers called in
with same "frame" in about 90 seconds. Seems like an effort to frame how the whole thing is perceived. Of course, they're totally ignoring the whole ongoing grand jury investigation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC