merwin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 07:34 PM
Original message |
Bush has NO valid reason to use the 'ongoing investigation' statement. |
|
Think about it. The person who's being investigated is his deputy chief of staff. The only reason to use that statement is to hide something. I think that's the point the dems should be making.
|
Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
..... he has to stay to talking points. :rofl:
|
Ksec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-13-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I keep hearing these treasonous buttholes |
|
Saying poor innocent Rove is being blindsided by the big evil meany lefties , meanwhile they say theyll withold judgement. Isnt saying someone is innocent of charges judging them innocent?
If I say hes guilty Im jud=ging him but if they say hes innocent its not? WTF?
|
merwin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Gotta love this administration's disconnected Nixonite logic. |
gratuitous
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:18 AM
Response to Original message |
4. Sure he's got a valid reason |
|
And it's the same reason for why Bush does anything: Me first.
|
merwin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. I said valid :-) That's a pretty lame reason (although it's true) |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |