Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush has NO valid reason to use the 'ongoing investigation' statement.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:34 PM
Original message
Bush has NO valid reason to use the 'ongoing investigation' statement.
Think about it. The person who's being investigated is his deputy chief of staff. The only reason to use that statement is to hide something. I think that's the point the dems should be making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes he does ......
..... he has to stay to talking points. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-05 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. I keep hearing these treasonous buttholes
Saying poor innocent Rove is being blindsided by the big evil meany lefties , meanwhile they say theyll withold judgement. Isnt saying someone is innocent of charges judging them innocent?

If I say hes guilty Im jud=ging him but if they say hes innocent its not? WTF?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Gotta love this administration's disconnected Nixonite logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sure he's got a valid reason
And it's the same reason for why Bush does anything: Me first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I said valid :-) That's a pretty lame reason (although it's true)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC