Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"What if the President or the Vice-President told Rove to leak the name?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:46 AM
Original message
"What if the President or the Vice-President told Rove to leak the name?"
This was a question posed by Don Imus to Wall St journalist reporter, Andrea Mitchell, this morning. Her response was shocking. "Can you say impeachment?", she asked. Coming from such an establishment figure as Andrea Mitchell, this was quite an eye-opener, in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pgh_dem Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. just for accuracy, she said 'how do you spell impeachment?' but the point
is the same. Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. Andrea surely know ain't no House Repugs every gonna vote for impeachment
of a Repug president or vice-president ever, under any circumstances, at least not more than one or two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgh_dem Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #15
26. Guess the point is that it would be an impeachable offense...
Remember you have to be 'convicted' in an impeachment.

And, just like Nixon, * may resign rather than face it.

The Repubs didn't vote on it, but they let Nixon know that they would...that's when Nixon packed it in 'for the good of the country' :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Isnt she married to a right winger? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adarling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. especially since her husband is Alan Greenspan
I have felt she has edited herself in the past partly because of this. But it seems they are all starting to come out of their shell of safety in standing up to the administration. I am very surprised by how dedicated David Gregory has been at questioning scotty boy. NBC seems to be making a turn around...which i say good for them. The today show was awesome as well, they had Wilson on their blasting the WH and Rove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatever4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think it's more like Rove told THEM. Not their idea, but complicit
I sure hope that concern gets enough attention. But, as with all "conspiracy theories", chances are it will be laughed out of public attention.

NO, they'd never do that. That would be wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. I've always believed that Bush and/or Cheney ordered the leak
I could even see Bush and Rove giggling like a couple of nasty little schoolgirls over it.

The person who thought this up was incredibly arrogant, nasty little SOB and none to bright to boot.

Sound like anyone we know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tenshi816 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Me too, especially the Dumbass.
I can just picture his little smirk and giggle while his beady eyes light up with glee. Considering we've been hearing for years what a petty and mean-spirited man * is, and how angry he gets when he doesn't get his way, and how spoiled he's been his entire life, I'd be more surprised if he didn't turn out to be involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. What do you mean "What if"?
In my opinion that's what the cover up is about, & hopefully the conclusion that Fitzgerald will come to. Why else are they spinning this so hard?




Keith’s Barbeque Central
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm guessing this goes straight to Cheney
Cheney's been throwing his weight around at the CIA since Bushco seized power, and Wilson's report was a direct shot across his bow. I think Cheney's up to his ears in this. I wonder, too, if Rove hasn't at some point said something like: "if I go to Leavenworth, all y'all motherfuckers go to Leavenworth." That might account for the current state of panic surrounding the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmcon007 Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Naw, this has that putrid smell of Rove and how he thinks.
I believe 'Boy Genius' is morphing into a huge albatross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GracieM Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. I don't have many doubts
That Bush or Cheney or both gave the order. I have serious doubts that it will ever be proven unless Rove turns on em...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. That's easy
Edited on Thu Jul-14-05 09:55 AM by Jack Rabbit
  1. The grand jury indicts him.
  2. The House of Representatives impeaches him.
  3. The Senate convicts him and removes him from office.

Contrary to constitutional myth, there is no reason a sitting president cannot be indicted and made to stand trial for a crime if a prosecutor has presented evidence to a grand jury that warrants it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Well, unless they throw out the whole bunch
We just might end up with Dennis Hastert or Ted Stevens as POTUS. Or the first black woman ever--unelected of course--Condoleeza Rice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. If Bush and Cheney were to both leave for any reason
If Bush and Cheney were to both leave for any reason this instant, Dennis Hastert, the speaker of the House would become president.

If this drags out to 2007, it is possible that Nancy Pelosi will become president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. I love Nancy ....
but I don't think 'murica would be ready for her to be president.

If Smirky and Snarly got thrown out before a possible Democratic take over of the House, Hastert would serve as caretaker president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
11. Bush doesn't deal in details
Unless it's something he can memorize and recite by rote, he plays the role of One Minute Manager. That's probably why those around him are soooo loyal.

I did hear yesterday someone commenting (Gergen, maybe?) that if someone were about to tell Bush and he said "Don't tell me, I don't want to know" that he would still have a problem; It doesn't excuse him from culpability. He IS the top guy, afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Good presidential advice
"The buck stops here". Truman

Mr. *, live up to the historic precedence of your office and accept responsibility for your administration's actions. To do anything less is non-conducive to the democracy the world envisions.

Make your small sacrifice for our nation and its future. Admit you have subverted the grand American idea of Liberty and Justice for All.

The Liberty you save just might be your own, and would shine a beacon of light across the world, showing, once again, the promise of our unique American democracy. All we ask is that you lead us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
12. The White House Will Not Be Able To Spin Their Way Out Of This.....
blunder regardless of what they do. Rove, Bush and others may be removed from office for their vicious, vindictive behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boo Boo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'll put my money on Cheney, but I wouldn't be surprised if Bush knew. /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
18. Well if Greenspan's wife is willing to say the "I" word...
That in itself seems to portend ill for the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
20. Cheney has the most to gain or lose with the Wilson's. Bush goes
along for the ride and the perks.

. Plame was investigating nuclear and wmd trafficking.
. Cheney had an involvement in nuclear and wmd trafficking.
. He may have been trying to shut down the operation she was involved in. (Search "cheney khan pakistan pentagon')
. He was part of the effort to start a war
. He was part of an effort to fix the reasons for the war
. He was supposed to have made several trips to the CIA about the war
. Someone higher up than Bush in strategizing had to make the decision to keep the yellowcake accusation in the SOTU speech.

It could have been that those on AF1 going to Africa went ahead and blindly made the decision to out Plame without checking lawyers or Gonzales.
But, it could have all been plotted out the AF1 trip and blessed by lawyers.
Or it could have been Bush having a revenge moment and demanding that they out her.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladeuxiemevoiture Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
21. Bush wouldn't do that.
It's an old political axiom that you keep your nose clean and leave the nitty gritty to underlings. The elder Daley was a master at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LizW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
22. They never would have told him to leak the name.
Rove is where he is because he can do this kind of dirty stuff on his on. He has a long history of coming up with this stuff and executing it without (usually) leaving a trail.

Frankly, I'm really surprised that he got caught making the calls himself. I would have thought he would distance himself from the actual leak by at least one degree of separation. But may being above the law for all these years has made him arrogant and careless.

I'm not saying that Bush and Cheney shouldn't be held responsible for the corruption and criminality in the WH, they are and they should. But remember Iran Contra and how Bush I was able to shield himself from that. These people learn from what works, and they get better at what they do.

I have no doubt that at least Cheney knew exactly what was going on, especially since it was his chief of staff Libby, and not Rove, who initiated the "work-up" on the Wilsons. But proving it will be tough.

Like an organized crime family, the lower guys will never squeal on the bosses, they'll just do their time. In their world a criminal conviction and jail time doesn't end a career (look at all the ones who are back after Watergate and Iran-Contra), but ratting out a big boss and getting him taken down most certainly does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. What if they only knew about but kep silent...?
Are they guilty of covering up a crime or obstructing justice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-05 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. More like some sort of Conspiracy...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC