Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Has anyone asked this? What if Plame is a set-up and it backfires on us?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lyberyl_prygryssyve Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:29 AM
Original message
Has anyone asked this? What if Plame is a set-up and it backfires on us?
We all know how the * Administration is adept at playing the people and the media like harps. What if this whole situation is just another example of that? What if it's yet another plan to embarrass Democrats and win yet another set of elections? Are we putting too much into this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. what if the sky isn't blue?
seriosuly. What would we do then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyberyl_prygryssyve Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. But the sky isn't really blue
It's not blue at night, is it? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. It is, on the other side of the earth
unless it's cloudy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyberyl_prygryssyve Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. Ha ha
Still, it's not the sky we're seeing as blue, but the light from the sun being bent into the blue color by the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. touche
more specifically, oxygen and light resonate well with bluer end of the visible spectrum and scatter those photons in all directions, as opposed to the other visible light that continues onwards without as much scattering.

But I meant the sky is blue, as in it is "sad". Sometimes it's so sad it cries. So would you if you thought Karl Rove was going to avoid jail time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. Forget it. Fitz is not playing with the criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfxgillis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. That's right.
I repeat, that's correct.

The behavior of the Special Counsel does not permit the hypothesis of sandbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. That is what I've been saying. But people continued to do the happy dance.
What if Rove is the distraction from someone else being the leaker. They can easily discredit us by putting him out there as the leaker after the fact to Cooper. He'll get off cuz it is after the fact and Bolton will squeeze through like liquid shit.

Further discrediting Dems raising issues in the future and bulletproofing the Admin against DSM allegations which is the key to the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tk2kewl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. If this is the case they will be in even deeper if/when Fitz indicts
whomever he indicts. And it sure seems like there will be indictments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. I hope so. But I don't think there will be any indictments of KKKarl,
or anyone else important. It will would be of a low-level secretary gaffer type.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Fitzgerald doesn't settle for indictments of low-level people
Check out his track record in Illinois and New York.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. I'm certain Fitzgerald is after more than just Rove
Edited on Fri Jul-15-05 11:52 AM by lancdem
Many others are involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
29. A shopping cart full of low-level staffers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. No, this involves big fish
Count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. I pray you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Maybe he can get Bolton while he is at it along with gw*dipshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. And what if the world is really only 6,000 years old and the evidence
proving evolution is all made up and there really were dinosaurs on the Ark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. OMG -- then we're all going to HELL????? Lions and tigers and bears!
Oh my.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
48. OMG totally off topic but......
We (hubby and I) had a work friend over last weekend so her 12 y.o. son could look through hubby's telescope.

My work pal is a great Democrat, but her ex is a RW Wack

so as we're waiting for the pizza the topic of earth changes comes up and I mentioned about the ice cores the scientists use to look at the atmosphere from thousands of years ago.

The kid tells me with a straight face that the earth is only 5000 years old. I ask "where did you hear that? School? Church?"

"My dad" says he, "and the Bible proves it!"


:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. What Rove admitted is enough to demand his resignation.
I dont' see how standing up for national security and the law hurts any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. Don't think so.

Rove isn't used to this kind of battle. Fitzgerald is no Ken Starr. He doesn't prance in front of the cameras. This means Rove is working in the dark, and his manuvres are imperfect. That's what guys like Fitzgerald thrive on. They lay out miles and miles of rope and let you hang yourself. We already see that this has caused him to be caught lying to the FBI (a crime).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Duck Donating Member (464 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's not if, but when.
Let's look at history here. Rove has been cooperating upto this point. He even publicly acknowledged his role. It is a set up. This administration never admits to anything, regardless of the obvious culpability. Keep an eye on this one. There is a Rovian double switch coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyberyl_prygryssyve Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
17. It just seems too easy
I mean, a deaf and blind Forrest Gump could've gumshoed this whole scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
8. "What if?" is just a way to make ourselves sick over nothing.
Inflict maximum political damage on the criminals in DC, keep the pressure on, and never give up.

NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
10. here is the problem with that
it was the CIA, NOT the democrats who referred this case to the justice department, who referred it to a special prosecuter

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
11. backfires how?
i don't see how it can backfire.
there is a grand jury investigation going on. someone is in jail because of this investigation. if this all amounts to nothing it is the prosecutor's problem not a Democratic one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. Fitzgerald would have closed oout his investigation over a year ago
if that was the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. Stop wringing your hands and attack...
No time for Chicken Littles....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lyberyl_prygryssyve Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I don't mean for people to back down from the investigation
I just hope what you said doesn't become another set of famous last words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
19. Nice try. Next!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. LOL: Oh, we're real worried about THAT!
There were only twenty other "DUers" making the same suggestion yesterday.

Wonder why so many? Oh, the fear of it all...:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Desperate much?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pgh_dem Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. hehe
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
23. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
32. Nope. It's their set up that is cause for criminality. They finally got
caught. That is the part they didn't factor in because they got away with everything else BECAUSE the media helped them. A prosecutor doing his job goes with the evidence and NOT the planted spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
33. We'll see how much of a "set-up" it is when the grand jury
finishes its work in a few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
34. Going after the press?
Rove looked very smug sitting behind the President yesterday. I worry that in the end, it's the press that the prosecutor is going after. That would certainly play right into the hands of the Republicans who are screaming about the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. he's delusional, but he may get off by reason of insanity n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. Welcome to DU!
I'm not worried about the prosecutor going after the press. No one in the press has a high level security clearance with knowledge of covert CIA NOCs...and if somehow that were the case, one can only conclude that he/she is a CIA high level operative as well.

Reports came out a couple of days ago that the WH is worried about indictment(s) coming out of the grand jury investigation. Indictments of WH official(s), specifically.

If Karl Rove was stupid enough to negligently make a connection of Wilson=Plame=CIA=Political Motive against Bush without first checking her status, then use it for political bullets, it is at best gross incompetence and wreckless disregard that jeopordizes the lives of individuals. Individuals who have placed their lives on the line for this country. It blows the cover of an entire operation years in the making under the taxpayers dime. All destroyed. And all for win at all costs gamesmanship.

Karl Rove needs to be indicted, heavily fined, and doing time in Siberia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GracieM Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
42. Welcome to the DU
From another newbie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OregonBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Thank you
I've been reading for a long time but this one has me worried. They seem too smug. Maybe MSM will finally take off the kid gloves and go after this corrupt bunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
36. Nah... Not On This One!
David Gregory, David Corn, Tom Oliphant, Michael Isikoff, Joe Connason, Al Franken, Rhandi Rhodes, Will Pitt and quite few others are ALL relatively looking to "out" the corrupt ones.

David Gregory was on The Daily Show a while back. That fact alone says something. He wasn't talking chit-chat with Jon, the dialog was about "the corrupt ones"! He and Jon seemed to know each other too!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. This will play itself out in the courts
Personally I believe Rove is a treasonous bastard, but at the minimum he should be held accountable for outing a covert CIA operative.

The defense RWers are using isn't sticking. Plame had no authority to authorize Wilson's mission and either way it still doesn't justify Rove telling Novak Plame's status. It's clear this was done with a political agenda - to try to smear Wilson.

And plus, Rove lied to a grand jury. Aren't repukes concerned about lying to grand juries? They were all over Clinton for what his lies over sex. This is much more serious in that it ruined Plame's career and entire operation - possibly putting people's lives in danger. This was done to make it easier to fix the intel.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Karl Rove not only 'outed a CIA operative' though
He blew the cover of an entire covert operation. Whether he was the originator or the confirmation of her employment makes no difference. His involvement blew the cover off the whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Exactly
He destroyed the operation because it was researching WMDs.

I think the outing of Plame was done not just to damage the Wilsons' careers and/or reputations. It was done also with the intent of destroying any objective operations researching WMD (remember Cheney himself went to CIA to get them to tell him what he wanted to hear - and Wolfy and others set up another bullshit agency connected to the Pentaon - forgot the name though).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. The Office of Special Plans (OSP)
Edited on Fri Jul-15-05 01:04 PM by Norquist Nemesis
Set up by Rumsfeld to second guess CIA and stovepipe info to the WH.

OMG! :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat: :tinfoilhat:
from a thread I posted earlier today about yesterday's debate...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=1930814&mesg_id=1930814

Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, there are some who may disagree with the proposition at the heart of Senator Reid's amendment; that is, that U.S. Government officials who violate the laws governing safeguarding sources should not be permitted to have continued access to that information. I happen to agree with that. I happen to think it is a fair point to discuss. As the Senator from Connecticut said, it is appropriate for this discussion.

In fact, there is a document that every employee signs. It is entitled ``Department of Defense Secrecy Agreement.'' The second part of it reads:

I agree that I will never divulge, publish or reveal, either by word, conduct, or by any other means, any classified information, intelligence, or knowledge, except in the performance of my official duties and in accordance with the laws of the United States, unless specifically authorized in writing in each case by the Secretary of Defense.

It is my understanding Senators do not sign it, Members of Congress do not sign it, but members of the administration and staff do sign this document. "

Who was planning the war???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. Rove is not a fencer, he wields a battle ax. Rove doesn't dance, he stomps
Rove doesn't sing, he screams. Rove is a primitive; that's why people think he's such a genius: he's unbounded by common, unspoken covenants of society. He's pretty bright, but he's no Cheney or Rumsfeld; he's possibly the most overrated intellect this side of Rice.

To suggest that this is an elaborate construct of byzantine fakes and daring self-exposures just to sucker rivals into exposing themselves as such just doesn't pass the sniff test. He's got too many people spooked, and they have no reason to be afraid.

This guy is simply not that good, not that subtle and DEFINITELY not possessed of enough self-control.

We've got to stop fearing the bogeyman; this guy makes his living by doing things decent folks wouldn't even contemplate, nothing more. That's why he's had a good run of it.

He's the modern Martin Bormann, and he's going to fall as hard as Robespierre did; he's made far too many enemies in his own camp over the years, and now he's done something that exposes them all as so ruthless that they'd commit treason and make us all incredibly vulnerable to (booga-booga-booga) WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, all for personal and party gain.

Let's just hope that prominent Republicans rally around him so the stink wears off on them too for their willingness to engage in such a filthy crime, and let's hope they cling to it and equivocate this dastardly act to no end. I want to be able to ask them "so, you're pro-treason?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. So far, Coleman, King, Hatch, Hutchison, Frist have STINK all over them.
There also some Democrats beginning to smell. James Carville has made some very odd comments, enough that I suspect he may be concerned over his wife's involvement in this. Mary was a member of WHIG. Wonder if she was called to testify?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC