Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

And they said Kerry was "too nuanced"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:17 PM
Original message
And they said Kerry was "too nuanced"?
In trying to save Rove's ass, they've nuanced and obfuscated the Plame outing to new heights. They've written a new chapter.

My latest image with respectful appreciation to William Carter Sawtelle and Amazing Stories.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't worry.....
Edited on Fri Jul-15-05 01:26 PM by sendero
.... this kind of "throw multiple piles of shit at the wall and see what sticks" stuff isn't going to help them much.

Sure, the party faithful will spout these points over and over, but anyone past the 5th grade can see past the "well he did it too" arguments.

I take this relentless mendacious chatter as typical of what Repubs do when they finally get caught with their pants down. IMHO, this happening now, rather than 1.5 years ago when Americans overall still thought the war in Iraq was a good plan, is very good for us and bad for them.

Coming now, it just adds another brick in the wall of lies that Americans are wising up to. And should there be indictments, all the blather they can muster won't do jack shit about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The midterm elections should be wild
I know that the voting machines are a huge factor. But any debates including Republican incumbents should be interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Look at it this way. The GOP still has some solid brainwashed base, but
some swing voters and even formerly solid repubs are bound to be turned off by this mess. If it all comes back up in '06 and the voters recognize the lying going on.. and the repubs win ANYWAY (shades of Max Cleland, anyone?) there will be that many more voices crying out for election reform: http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/electionreform.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InternalDialogue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Exactly. I'm counting on all the noncomittal
citizens who couldn't be bothered to figure out the workings of bill introduction and senate procedure in order to understand "I voted for it before I voted against it" in 2004. They're the same people we need to court when it comes to Republican spin on "I never used her name" or "she wasn't covert."

I too expect that there will be a huge shift in moderate voters come next fall. Will those votes show up correctly in the tallies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. They won't show up correctly, not in Diebold territory. But like I said
look at the rage we felt when Kerry didn't win despite the feeling on the ground. I think a lot of other voters will experience the shake up over the next few election cycles.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Especially if the war goes from worse to "worser"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Right you are!
I've figured from the start that the court of public opinion will judge the administration harshly. Who wants to align themselves with a pack of liars and killers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. and thieves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. oh yes! the third character in the unholy trinity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-15-05 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, isn't it rich?
No one in the media on the news or on cable could possibly figure out what John Kerry meant when he said that he voted for additional funding for the Iraq war (when the bill included provisions for Iraq to pay us back) before he voted against the funding (when the bill was simply an outlay from Uncle Sugar).

Hoo boy! What a flip-flopper Kerry was! Nobody could make head nor tail out of the concept that Kerry voted against one form of the appropriation bill that screwed over the taxpayers, but voted for a version that at least nominally included the idea that we'd get paid back out of oil revenues. Far too complicated for the assembled masses of the talking chuckleheads to comprehend, they just sat back and laughed at a candidate who could distinguish between two different versions of an appropriation bill.

Now, there's a different excuse every day about Rove and his loose lips, a different timeline, a different cast of characters, even a different reality where the individuals go from duplicitous masterminds to clueless show dogs, from desk jockeys to running the CIA, all in the same breath. But now the media can keep up with all of it daily, sometimes even hourly, and they never evince the slightest confusion or anything less than dead certainty that what they're saying right this second represents the truest explanation of reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC