there and ignored them?
The only thing wrong with the speech is that Dean did not recognize who his audience was: the millions watching on television, many being exposed to Howard Dean live for the first time. Dean addressed his speech solely to his supporters in Iowa. If there were no media around, it would be hard for most people (especially men) to find a lot of fault with the speech.
His great sin is that he did not bow down to the television gods like all politicians since JFK have done. Perhaps this is one of Dean's greatest threat to the establishment--he does not rely primarily on television to generate his support. (He's too hot for tv! He's unelectable!). He's built his candidacy through the Internet and good old grassroots. No doubt, he has and will use television, but at least until the speech it was less of a factor in his campaign than most.
I've been wondering all week if Dean and his people just really screwed up in not realizing how important the speech was, or if Dean was almost defiantly refusing to have television dictate how he should behave. For those of us who watch CSPAN, Dean wasn't doing anything we hadn't seen many times before, only in Iowa there wasn't any anger, just exuberant determination.
BTW, for those who haven't seen it yet, you can see the speech from the perspective of the audience at
http://www.webmastersforamerica.com/Idiom_Studio/video1.htm.They've gotten close to a hundred thousand hits on their site. The crowd was very loud, and Dean had to shout over it. It seems that on television the mics did not pick up much of the crowd noise, only Dean.