Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: 'Indispensable' - Does It Have A Shelf Life (More Repubs Bash Karl)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:00 AM
Original message
NYT: 'Indispensable' - Does It Have A Shelf Life (More Repubs Bash Karl)
Pointed out by Americablog:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/17/weekinreview/17korn.html?oref=login

'Indispensable': Does It Have a Shelf Life?
By ANNE E. KORNBLUT

One former Republican official who retains close ties to the White House said there could be a political cost for keeping Mr. Rove on board even if he is found to have done nothing illegal. "If Karl survives, he does so at the president's political expense," said the former official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he did not want to be seen as disloyal to Mr. Rove.

"George W. Bush came into office promising two tenets that are in competition now: straight talk, non-parsing - and loyalty," the former official said. "He's either got to choose loyalty or straight talk. He can't do both."....

-snip -

"The Bush operating style is, you be loyal to me, I'll be loyal back to you - and I'm not going to let my critics think they can prompt a lot of resignations just by pointing out that we said we'd fire them," said Professor Stephen Walt, academic dean of the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard.

But, Mr. Walt said: "With Bush now being a lame duck, you start to wonder whether or not he'll have the same clout. At what point does the R.N.C. start weighing in and saying, 'Gee, we know he can't run again. But do we want to be saddled with a scandal that will make it harder for us to win in 2008?' "

MORE



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey too late
Lame duck republican already allow chimp to run wild and brought US to utter destruction. Don't think the lame duck republicans know what to do now, they just standing there and staring at all this mess and wondering "this all a dream right, not happening, just a dream"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. We warned them
Add Bush to this list of self-destructive habits that were sold with fancy ads and lies.

- smoking
- SUVs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. When the republican implode
it be real ugly. Going to a lot of bitterness and anger. All this just a build up to the big bang.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. If I were advising Bush . . .
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 05:35 AM by snot
I'd say, show just enough hesitation to evince becoming loyalty; then w/o too much delay, have Rove resign, with whispers that the resignation was strongly suggested by Bush; then of course, out of public view, keep consulting Rove as fully as ever, since one does need a brain--I'm sure more than one sinecure awaits Rove in the various conservative so-called think-tanks; meanwhile claim credit for understanding that, regardless of Rove's "innocence," Rove's resignation had to be accepted in order to allay any possible concern re- any adverse effect on national security . . .

I mean, it's so f---ing simple, I'm surprised it's taking this long . . . I can only presume Rove's most recent advice has been colored by his own egotistical concerns . . . and I imagine Bush is well aware of that possibility and is feeling pretty darn anxious all around . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Trouble is
that it would be pretty obvious if Rove resigned but then still kept coming to the WH every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's what secure telephones are for. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yes, there are lots of other ways to communicate. nt
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 02:06 PM by snot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. They keep rove in the
wh dungeon if they have to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dan Donating Member (595 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. the problem with this is...
Security Clearance issues.

What is going on - might be a felony,...might be treason.

And now, the Vice President's chief of staff is involved...

lies on top of lies, and it is all going back to the central issue:

Bush wanted war with Iraq.

Everything else is a sympton, remember that. The problem or the hud of this whole mess is, the Iraq war.

Bush now truly will have his place in American history. If Bush is impeached, I wonder if the families that have lost members in this conflict will have the right to sue Bush and other members of this administration that are found guilty of high crimes, etc.

We live in interesting times....

BUT, what is also important is this: The GOP is revealing that their loyal is to the party and the president, not the Constitution of the US. Unless we change the Congress in 2006 - we will not get to the truth. On a grassroots level, we must change Congress, force the GOP congressmen to determine - what do they stand for: The GOP or America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Huh?
"'Gee, we know he can't run again. But do we want to be saddled with a scandal that will make it harder for us to win in 2008?' " --Anne E. Kornblut, NYT

Gee, whadda we gotta worry about when we got Wally O'Dell counting all the votes!

-------

This is such crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cestpaspossible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. This article includes a blatant lie in paragraph six
"So far, there is no proof that Mr. Rove committed any wrongdoing, let alone anything illegal: while he spoke to two journalists about Valerie Wilson, a C.I.A. operative whose husband went to Niger on a fact-finding mission about weapons of mass destruction, the accounts so far suggest Mr. Rove merely confirmed what the journalists already knew."

As has been pointed out by Henry Waxman, confirming classified information is the same as originally disclosing classified information according to the law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Penndems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is Karl Rove indispensable? Short answer: Of course not
Edited on Sun Jul-17-05 02:52 PM by Penndems
This country has survived:

The Revolutionary War
The French and Indian War
The War of 1812
The Mexican-American War
The Civil War (which almost DID tear us apart)
The Spanish-American War
Two World Wars
Economic depressions
Assassinations (and attempted assassinations) of our leaders
Terrorists attacks from both foreign and domestic enemies
The Korean War
The Viet-Nam War
The Persian Gulf War
. . . and now, The War in Iraq

No one in government is indispensable. We'll survive Karl Rove (and the rest of this crooked, conniving cabal). We've survived WORSE than Karl Rove. For the RNC to suggest otherwise is asinine and shows just how limited they are when it comes to learning from past mistakes. How typical of those clowns to engage in inflated self-aggrandizing.


(on edit: typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wallwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. There's blood in the water...
and there will be more.

Feeding frenzy to follow. Sure, he might survive, but he also may end up as a bloody carcass that floats to the surface for a few moments just before sinking permanently...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Little rivelets of
blood..don't know if it's human, yet.

Heh, they mentioned Watergate in this article as a precident!

"But there are few historical models for the ousting of a figure like Mr. Rove. There is the save-the-sinking ship model. When the Nixon administration began to unravel, because of Watergate, three of Richard Nixon's most trusted aides - H.R. Haldeman, the chief of staff; Richard Kleindienst, the attorney general; and John Ehrlichman, the domestic policy adviser - had to go, in order to try to save the president himself. No presidency before or since has seen such upheaval at its highest echelons."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, like Gore
was?!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC