Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times - Wife of Nominee Holds Strong Antiabortion Views

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:26 AM
Original message
LA Times - Wife of Nominee Holds Strong Antiabortion Views
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/la-na-wife21jul21,0,5600880,print.story

Wife of Nominee Holds Strong Antiabortion Views
By Richard A. Serrano
Times Staff Writer

July 21, 2005

WASHINGTON — While Supreme Court nominee John G. Roberts Jr.'s views on abortion triggered intense debate on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, there is no mistaking where his wife stands: Jane Sullivan Roberts, a lawyer, is ardently against abortion.

A Roman Catholic like her husband, Jane Roberts has been deeply involved in the antiabortion movement. She provides her name, money and professional advice to a small Washington organization — Feminists for Life of America — that offers counseling and educational programs. The group has filed legal briefs before the high court challenging the constitutionality of abortion.

A spouse's views normally are not considered relevant in weighing someone's job suitability. But abortion is likely to figure prominently in the Senate debate over John Roberts' nomination. And with his position on the issue unclear, abortion rights supporters expressed concern Wednesday that his wife's views might suggest he also embraced efforts to overturn Roe vs. Wade.

"It's unclear how all this will affect her husband," said Jennifer Palmieri, a spokeswoman with the Center for American Progress, a liberal public policy group. "It's possible that he would have a different view than her. It's just that in the absence of information about this guy, people are looking at her and trying to read the tea leaves."

continued
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. If Santorum is pleased with him,
that says all I need to know about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justitia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. She is also a War Profiteer. Her firm advises on "Iraq reconstruction"
contracts.

Woman Hating War Profiteer.

The perfect Bush Admin Stepford Wife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Wonder if she's a member of the Federalists also....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. Judge Roberts is Catholic
The important issue to us is what sort of Catholic is Judge Roberts? Is he a Catholic like John Kerry or Ted Kennedy, men that can separate their religious views from their acts as public servants, or is Roberts more like the type of politician that the Vatican prefers: anti-gay and anti-abortion.

That's a fair line of inquiry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I agree
What kind of Christian...we have all kinds now as listed
my signature...is he Opus Dei like Scalia and Thomas,
is he a Domionist like Scalia, a Rapturist...does
he attend Mass every day, is he as devout as his wife?
Does his faith POV dominate his views? How does he
feel about Harry Potter :-)

What church related charities do they give to?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandomom Donating Member (327 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. Another thread today shows a brief
that Judge Roberts wrote opposing certain restrictions on anti-choice protestors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. would you post that thread link....thanks...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Anyone who defends
the actions of that terrorist organization, Operation Rescue is suspect to me. Randall Terry must be positively orgasmic about now.

Mz Pip
:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. How the hell can you call yourself a feminist
if you are anti-choice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. well, it's another Republican oxymoron.....
from Republican oxymorons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sunnystarr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I checked it out on Wikipedia ...
He and his wife, Jane Marie Sullivan Roberts, have two adopted children, Josephine ("Josie"), age 5 and Jack, age 4. Robert's wife was previously the vice-president of Feminists for Life, a feminist anti-abortion organization with an extensive college outreach program.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_G._Roberts_Jr.

....

As these statements show, Feminists for Life believes that being pro-life is not only compatible with feminism, it is the natural conclusion of feminist values. Members and supporters of the organization frequently claim that being a pro-life feminist "is not an oxymoron, it's redundant."


Harvard Law School professor Dr. Mary Ann Glendon descibes pro-life feminism as follows:

"What is clearly 'old-fashioned' today is the old feminism of the 1970s -- with its negative attitudes toward men, marriage and motherhood, and its rigid party line on abortion and gay rights."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminists_for_Life


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC