Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Robert's work for Ken Starr

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:57 PM
Original message
Robert's work for Ken Starr
http://www.mydd.com/

Surprise, surprise. Roberts's work for Ken Starr was not about being an advocate, it was about furthering the conservative political agenda:
Solicitor General Kenneth W. Starr is expected to name Washington attorney John G. Roberts Jr. to be the "political" deputy in the solicitor's office, the government's advocate before the Supreme Court.
Roberts, 34, a former clerk to Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, met Starr when both worked as aides to Attorney General William French Smith in the early Reagan years.

from The September 29, 1989, Washington Post reported:

The job, counselor to the solicitor general as well as deputy solicitor general, was created in 1982 after strong conservative criticism that the traditionally independent office was not forceful enough in pushing the administration's social agenda at the high court. Of the five deputies in the office, the political deputy is the only non-career appointee.

This was a position created in order to further a partisan agenda, not to enhance the legal capabilities of the solicitor general. It was created to render a "traditionally independent" office less independent and more politically partisan. Is it that much of a stretch to argue that the second Bush is trying to hire Roberts in order to perform the same function on the Supreme Court?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Questions to ask Roberts about this....
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2005/7/20/161152/522

However, it is rather disingenuous to ignore the fact that Roberts would have been likely to have an clear idea of the social issues he would be representing on behalf of the administration.

The Senate may consider the following line of questioning for Mr. Roberts:

(1) Were you aware that the deputy solicitor general post was created to promote 'the administration's social agenda'?
(2) Were you familiar with the major elements of Bush's social agenda when you accepted the position? What were those elements?
(3) What are the factors that you consider when evaluating a prospective position? Do you usually select positions where you will be likely to be defending cases that are consistent with your own value system or ideology?
(4) What motivated you to accept Kenneth Starr's offer?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. A blatantly political neo-con corporate jurist
Just what the cabal ordered.

What about his advocacy to deny US Veterans the right to file legal suits against the US Government?

I hope our veterans will stand up and speak out on this part of his background.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This guy is scary.....scare people about him.
I don't care if he looks like the John
Bircher next door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC