Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waxman: 11 Security Breaches in Plame Case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Smirking_Chimp Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 09:08 AM
Original message
Waxman: 11 Security Breaches in Plame Case
New Fact Sheet Details Multiple Administration Security Breaches Involving Valerie Plame Wilson

On July 14, 2003, columnist Robert Novak revealed that the wife of Ambassador Joseph Wilson, Valerie Plame Wilson, was a covert CIA agent. This disclosure of classified information has triggered a criminal investigation by a Special Counsel and led to calls for congressional investigations.

The Novak column, however, appears to be only one of multiple leaks of Ms. Wilson's identity. As this fact sheet documents, there appear to be at least 11 separate instances in which Administration officials disclosed information about Ms. Wilson's identity and association with the CIA.

Under Executive Order 12958, the White House is required to investigate any reports of security breaches and take "prompt corrective action," such as suspending the security clearances of those involved. Unlike prosecutions for criminal violations, which require "knowing" and "intentional" disclosures, the executive order covers a wider range of unauthorized breaches, including the "negligent" release of classified information. There is no evidence that the White House has complied with its obligation to investigate any of the 11 reported instances of security breaches relating to Ms. Wilson or to apply administrative sanctions to those involved.

http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_23080.shtml

cool!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. Makes you wonder what other sensitive information
they recklessly threw around. Yet, they go through extraordinary means to protect their personal security.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Waxman hasn't learned yet that the Administration doesn't answer to anyone
They do not follow law or regulation and pretty much do as they damn well please and what you gunna do about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Until the Dems realize they HAVE to DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT
it will continue. The few who haven't already sold out that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Executive Order 12958
Quaint and outdated. No longer applies. Game Over. Try Again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. NOT HARDLY. many amendments have issued, but it is still referred to
by its original number ... feast your eyes on the most current, the one the chimpster signed in 2003 - hardly game over!!!

http://www.fas.org/sgp/bush/eoamend.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. OK, I forgot to put the sarcasm at the end of that
It was a reference to how Alberto Gonzales got out of the Geneva Conventions. He pronounced them "quaint" and therefor without validity. You don't have to obey quaint laws if you are a member of the BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-23-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. wonder if and when this will hit the MSM
I get so tired of waiting 6 months for
this stuff to come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC