Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the Rove/Libby scandal related to the Franklin scandal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 04:05 AM
Original message
Is the Rove/Libby scandal related to the Franklin scandal?
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 04:35 AM by Starfury
Oh, yeah, the other Bush administration spy scandal...

State of the State Secrets

Larry Franklin wanted to sway policy, not just spill intel.

by Justin Raimondo

(...)

In December 2001, Franklin, along with Harold Rhode, a Middle East expert and Franklin’s colleague in Feith’s policy shop, and neoconservative writer Michael Ledeen—at the time working for Feith as a consultant—met with the infamous Manucher Ghorbanifar, of Iran-Contra fame, and a group of Iranians, including a former high official of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard. Also in attendance: Nicolo Pollari, head of the Italian intelligence service, and Italian Defense Minister Antonio Martino. As writer Laura Rozen tells it, “Ghorbanifar told me he has had fifty meetings with Michael Ledeen since September 11th, and that he has given Ledeen ‘4,000 to 5,000 pages of sensitive documents’ concerning Iran, Iraq and the Middle East, ‘material no one else has received.’”

(...)

When the FBI confronted Franklin and searched his home and office—turning up 83 classified documents, spanning three decades—he agreed, at first, to help the investigation, presumably in return for a promise of leniency. By some accounts, notably those by pro-AIPAC writer Edwin Black, Franklin agreed to make a series of monitored phone calls to suspects in the investigation, including neoconservative supporters of Chalabi. They also supposedly planted information via Franklin that Israeli agents operating in the Kurdish area of northern Iraq were in danger of assassination by Iranian agents. The Jewish Telegraphic Agency reports that Franklin met with Weissman on July 21, 2004 outside Nordstrom’s at the Pentagon City mall in Arlington and warned him about Israel’s Kurdish problem. Alarmed, Weissman and Rosen passed this on to AIPAC, which raised the matter in meetings with NSC official Eliot Abrams. They also called Naor Gilon, top political officer at the Israeli embassy. This was followed shortly afterward by the FBI’s first raid on AIPAC’s Washington headquarters. (They would return four months later.)

Whoever leaked details of the case to CBS News, including Franklin’s identity, nixed the FBI’s efforts to trace the transfer of sensitive materials from the spy nest embedded in our government to Israeli officials. FBI officials were furious: the leaker had effectively sabotaged their investigation, at least for the moment. Franklin stopped co-operating with the authorities, dismissed his court-appointed lawyer, and hired the high-priced law firm of Plato Cacheris.

The recent kickstarting of the prosecution, however, has seen a sea change in AIPAC’s defense strategy. Rosen and Weissman have been handed their walking papers, and AIPAC is backpedaling furiously on its previous statements denying any wrongdoing by its employees, although the group is still paying the duo’s legal bills. JTA reports indicate they are both to be indicted shortly, and Rosen anticipates the trial may begin as early as January 2006. He has pledged to fight the charges.

When this case comes to trial, it won’t be only three spies for Israel who stand accused: the whole nexus of organizations and interests that came together in the War Party will be put in the dock.

(...)

Maybe it's just me, but it seems like the Rove/Libby scandal is related to the Franklin scandal.

In particular, I'm curious about the reference to 'the recent kickstarting of the prosecution.' That suggests new information has been uncovered. Can anyone provide more information about that?

Also, Abrams and Ledeen have been mentioned tangentially in the Rove/Libby scandal (I think Abrams may be the 3rd official referred to by Cooper, for example, and Ledeen has serious Italian contacts that may have generated the Niger uranium document.) Is there a direct connection between these two investigations (Franklin, Rove/Libby)? People keep referring to "bigger fish" that Fitzgerald is after. I'm wondering if the Cooper/Miller judge's redacted material relates to this AIPAC intelligence pipeline. Any thoughts? Hope I'm making a little bit of sense, at least....

BTW, this is an excellent primer on the Franklin spy case, and I highly recommend it, even if it is from the American Conservative. http://www.amconmag.com/2005_06_06/feature.html

It also mentions that "America’s grand democratization project in the Middle East" is "the Special Relations Initiative of 2005” between the US and Israel...

Edit: Here's another piece of data that maybe supports my theory. From http://politerra.com/images/Iraqchronologyrawstory.pdf
September 26, 2003

John Dion, Director of the DOJ's Counterespionage section decides to pursue a criminal investigation of the Valerie Plame leak.

Eric Lichtblau. Special council is named to head inquiry on CIA leak.” 31 December 2003. Available at: http://pegc.no-ip.info/archive/Press/NY_Times/nyt_digest_2003.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Last Lemming Donating Member (806 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the early morning tip
I try to swing by Justin Raimondo's blog periodically but haven't gotten to this yet. His writing on this case is the most detailed I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. I read somewhere else on DU that it was Judith Miller
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 07:41 AM by DoYouEverWonder
who leaked the info to Global Relief Foundation that the FBI were on the way when they got raided.

I wonder if she's in the middle of this one too?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's all one story.
ALL of the dots connect. And the picture that emerges is pretty darn ugly!

Iraq, Plame, Bolton, Miller, Cheney's energy meeting, and now this. What else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting names on the trail of the infamous fake Italian document...
Ledeen might be a good place to start. Perhaps Fitzgerald should ask him a few questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jose Diablo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Gosh, if Ledeen has to give testimony
Edited on Sun Jul-24-05 08:22 AM by Jose Diablo
Fitz will have the bagman, the money. This could burn the whole Republican party to the ground.

If Fitz snatches Ledeen, then I would think Ledeen would become very despondent, prone to accidents.

Edit: I wonder if its possible to turn an attorney, someone like Baker. Wouldn't it be something if the Ledeen trail led to Baker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC