Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember Anita Hill? She thinks Roberts is "a step back for diversity."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:01 PM
Original message
Remember Anita Hill? She thinks Roberts is "a step back for diversity."
CHANGING OF THE GUARD
Anita Hill slams
choice of Roberts
Woman who opposed Clarence Thomas claims Bush pick step back for diversity
Posted: July 24, 2005
4:15 p.m. Eastern



http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45422

Anita Hill, the woman who opposed Clarence Thomas for the Supreme Court by alleging sexual harassment, is now blasting President Bush's selection of John Roberts, claiming it's a step back for diversity and fears it could lead to "an all-white-male Supreme Court."

In a commentary published in Newsday, Hill, who is now a professor of social policy, law and women's studies at Brandeis University, writes:

"Was John Roberts chosen because he's the best choice for the court or because he may easily be confirmed? And why not choose a woman to replace retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman on the Supreme Court? Or use this as an opportunity to nominate the first Latino to the court?

"Not surprisingly, the answer to these questions has to do with the politics of confirmability. One thing is certain: If nominees are selected based on the very narrow and elite credentials that brought us John Roberts, a wide range of equally qualified, more diverse candidates will never even be considered." Hill admits not much is known about Roberts' political ideology, but notes "his career has been built on membership in increasingly elitist institutions that include few women and Latinos or other ethnic minorities."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bribri16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. He is a step back for evrything but why waste money on a sure confrim?
The conservatives are spending millions promoting this nominee when they don't really have to spend a dime. We are being stupid to waste money on ads against Roberts when he is going to be confiremed. We need to save the money for fighting the next nominee who is going to be much worse than Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. She should be submitted. More guts than all the Senate combined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm glad to hear from her. I hadn't heard her name even mentioned
until last week when son broadcast was reviewing former SCOTUS hearings and they showed her testifying.

Other than the whwite elitist coments, I wonder what she really knows about him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-24-05 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Maybe...and I acknowledge this is tinfoil hat stuff here...
...Bush selected a pretty white golden boy so that when he puts Gonzales up for the next nomination, he'll be applauded as a hero and a champion of diversity.

Hey, I SAID it was tinfoil hat...but given what we've witnessed from this administration so far, how tinfoil hat IS IT?

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC