Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wayne Madsen article... Roberts intends to interfer in Fitzgerald probe!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:02 PM
Original message
Wayne Madsen article... Roberts intends to interfer in Fitzgerald probe!
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 04:04 PM by Joanne98
July 26, 2005 -- Sen. Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) intends to interfere in Fitzgerald probe. Senator Pat Roberts, chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, announced that his commitee will be "reviewing" the criminal probe by special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald of the White House leak of the identities of covert CIA agents. If Roberts is serious and not just grandstanding, this may indicate that the White House is looking to give Fitzgerald's targets (Karl Rove, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, and others) congressional general immunity from prosecution in return for their testimony before Roberts' committee. This was the method by which John Poindexter and Oliver North were able to avoid jail time for their roles in Iran-contra, their convictions being overturned by a federal appeals court because of their previously granted congressional immunity. There is also a bit of Watergate redux in Roberts' statement. Pressure by the GOP on Fitzgerald is reminiscent of the Nixon administration's decision to fire Watergate prosecutor Archibald Cox. That prompted the resignations of Nixon's Attorney and Deputy Attorney General. Meanwhile, the Karl Rove/neocon spin machine is stepping up its criticism of ex-CIA officers who are defending Valerie Plame and Joseph Wilson. The Project for a New American Century (PNAC) director Gary Schmitt penned a screed in William Kristol's and Rupert Murdoch's Weekly Standard attacking former CIA officer and Valerie Plame colleague Larry Johnson, who gave the Democratic weekly radio response to Bush's address on July 23. The neocon attack on CIA veterans, including the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), began in earnest on the/Republican Freerepublic.com site, a bevy of white supremacists, JDLers, and John Birchers largely based in California's San Joaquin Valley and Orange County.


http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ncteechur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I just don't know what to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I do--
they are guilty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
34. I think so too
And from my understanding they're not going to find anything on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsTryska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. well to steal a page fromt he playbook.....
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 04:07 PM by MsTryska
how can Roberts be smeared before he has a chance to get any cachet on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. He mentions freerepublic! LOL
The neocon attack on CIA veterans, including the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), began in earnest on the/Republican Freerepublic.com site, a bevy of white supremacists, JDLers, and John Birchers largely based in California's San Joaquin Valley and Orange County.


http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/

He calls them white supremacists! HAHA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. That's calling a spade a spade............
it's a right wing, white supremacist hate sight. Hit the nail right on the head there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hope Andrea Mitchell is right and Fitzgerald will finish this summer...as
Robert's hearings will not begin until after the August break in September.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I heard on MSNBC earlier today that Fitz may extend the
grand jury for 4 extra months. This could be a story planted by the White House or it could be true. If Fitz does extend for 4 months than Robert's hearings will get Rove, et al off and will let Fitz off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Or it could ba a Fitz diversion
To make Roberts think he has more time for his BS "review".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I just don't think Fitz has said a single word to the press - this
came, most likely, from Rove's strategy group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
35. Could be
Because they know they're all guilty which is the only reason why I think they're doing this. Didn't they all praise Fitzgerald at first? Then they knew they were fucked I think. So could be happening (that Fitzgerald puts out his own review).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is not a complete surprise....
Republicans only know how to manipulate the system to their advantage, they have no clue, anymore, as to how to face the fury when someone on their side steps over the line.

Remember, back during Watergate, the Republican's stepped up to the plate and said enough is enough. Howard Baker, the Republican ranking member during the Senate Watergate Committee hearings, wouldn't allow the White House to stall or ignore without his own personal reprimand.

Even Fred Thompson...yes THAT Fred Thompson for us Law & Order fans... who was the Republican counsel, was hard, but fair, and wanted the truth no matter how hard it was going to be on his party.

Those hearings gave me two things: Respect for the Republican's in Congress at the time, who not only recognized the seriousness of the situation, but who acted on it; AND the last time I saw the Republican Party act in a responsible way!!

I am sure they are getting tired of this crap. Watergate, then Iran-Contra....then trying to get even with GotchaGate against Clinton...and now ROVEGATE, but they should learn to play fair and open, and quit buying into all of the BS that their leadership keeps expelling!

http://truthfromtheamericanmiddle.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. That's precisely how I felt
re the Watergate hearings and the Republicans at the time as well. Hell, it was Howard Baker who convinced Nixon to resign. True, it may have been political expediency (since Nixon WAS going to be impeached), but at least he did that, and he and other Republican Senators conducted themselves like statesmen during those hearings. I miss that in Washington. I see precious little of it from either side, and I miss it.

I was thinking about the changes last night -- I still blame Reagan and Gingrich entirely, absolutely 100%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NativeTexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #26
43. Well noted
You are 100% correct! Reagan and Gingrich were the culprits in the changes. Throw in Kenneth Starr and you have the trifecta!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. We KNOW that is the intent and each and every
Democrat Senator needs to raise hell and PUBLICALLY call Robert's bluff by exposing the similarities to the Iran Contra investigations. I can't believe for a minute that our Senators will not see this coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueWolff Donating Member (337 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I agree
The freepers are going to go ballistic over this post! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Roberts and Sennsenbrenner have been given marching orders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Obstruction of justice, even by Congress, is something these weavers
should be aware of themselves...tick tick tick.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's painfully obvious............
that the GOP is more concerned with covering the bush administration's ass than they are with truth and the security of the United States. If this isn't hammered into the heads of voters in '06 by the Democrats, I'm going to have to jump off a freaking bridge! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. Oh of course
It's Bush loyalty first and everybody else later. Even if it means security and someone getting killed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. The reason North and Poindexter were exonerated is different and won't fly
To understand why North and Poindexter were exonerated requires an understanding of the end of the Cold War. The Soviet/Afghan conflict was our plan to embroil the Soviet's into thier own vientnam. With an out of control arms race with the U.S. and constant warfare or tension in the southern borders, the soviets would need to commit more of thier GDP to secutiy and military spending. They did this for nearly 10 years before it broke them, but it did break them. Now, a lot of people believe we were at odds with Iran because of the Iranian hostage crisis and the Iran/Iraq war but this may not be the case. It hardly seems logical that we would work to install a Radicalized muslim oppostion in Afghanistan with the intent on forming an Extremely right-wing government and not find any geopolitical advantage in Iran developing along those same lines. In truth, the Iran/Contra scandal only confirms the fact that our government wasn't as openly hostile as they pretended to be. The reason the Iran/Contra scandal was such a big deal was not because the CIA and Military were illegally trading arms with Iran, it's because they were taking the money from the sale of those arms, buying drugs with it and using the profit from that to fund the contras. However, since these men were somewhat responsible for winning the Cold War, they got a free pass.

Rove's situation is a bit more sticky than that. He hasn't such credentials and it would look very bad for any Senator to offer immunity to any of the people being investigated. North and Poindexter were involved in an illegal enterprise that was intended to serve American interests, no matter how misguided. Karl Rove was involved in an illegal enterprise to better his own political agenda and engage in a deception to undermine the integrity of the CIA. There is a huge difference. There is no way to offer immunity in this case, it would be tantamount to political suicide and could result in obstruction and comspiracy charges brought against Roberts and anyone else involved. I'm not saying they won't try it but it would backfire on them. The blowback would be deadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Good points mike
The CIA asked for the DOJ to look into this--
This may pit the CIA against the NEo COns in the White House.
Like Larry Johnson on Randis show (AAR) yesterday he a repub -- and he is pissed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. Shameless Hubris. They'll try it. Karl "War Hero" Rove! YUK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Now Congress could grant immunity if there were greater...
national security interests but they'd have to show how the crime of perjury was serving the interests of the nation. The only other way they could grant it would be if Rove decided to roll on Bush. This could happen but it's pretty unlikely. We'd have to shake them real hard for that to happen. But without anything more than Madsens article, I'd say Roberts would be pretty damn foolish to try a stunt like this, especially if it stands a chance of costing him his seat and possible incarceration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
38. I think it'd backfire too
I think if they fire Fitzgerald or give Rove immunity or anything like that it will backfire them for 2008 for sure and next year. All the polls I've seen have sided against Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. Not just politically - they would essentially be using thier power to
obstruct justice. That's a crime of conspiracy, thye'd go to jail if they try it. I can't imagine any lawyer suggesting this is a wise course. Even though Gonzales found a loop-hole in the Geneva Conventions to allow torture, I'm sure he cautioned the President against it. If he didn't, he's an idiot. The same would go for Roberts lawyer, if he doesn't advise him against this, he should be disbared. Imagine how leanient a liberal activist judge would be towards thier case. Remember, the cover-up is worse than the crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #42
50. nevermind
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 08:17 AM by GreenArrow
not pertinent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
15. I have a strong feeling they shouldn't go after Fitzgerald.
The man has dealt with the mob for Pete's sake and is not intimidated by the likes of Pat Roberts. If anything, it'll probably egg him on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. That was my thought as well... nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. That's good experience for this mess! Maybe he'll use RICO after all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let the Propagandist pre-pardon these traitors. America will exact revenge
in Nov. 2006!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kansasblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
17. Roberts (R-Ks) is an embarrassment. Kansas apologizes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Thanks, Kansas. Don't feel as though you need to apologize.
He's a rat bastard and he could have crawled out from under just about anywhere.

No worries.:hi:

Do us a favor, ok? Try like hell to get rid of him next time.

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmik debris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Imagine how much guilt we feel in Texas
We tried to plead temporary insanity, but the real world won't buy it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nookiemonster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #17
47. Neighbor, you're in good company
Since the idiots here put Baby Blunt in office, we have no right to bitch about another state's politics.

BTW, it's not your fault.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
18. Can you post a permanent link?
Months from now, if anyone goes to the link you've provided looking for this story, they aren't going to find it. Thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. I can't it's a blog! Or if I can I don't know how! Sorry!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
21. Everyone keep this kicked and forward copies to everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
29. OMG! He wrote an even better piece right below this one!
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 05:58 PM by Joanne98
It's about counter-intelligence forces hitting Valerie Plame and CIA's sources and making it look like terrorist attacks! I love this guy.

July 26, 2005 -- CIA agents concerned about counter-intelligence "hits" masked as terrorist attacks. In the aftermath of the outing by the White House of the identities of covert CIA agents, CIA professionals are concerned about past and future terrorist bombings being used by foreign counter-intelligence agencies and terrorist organizations to selectively assassinate CIA agents and assets identified as being involved in America's counter-WMD proliferation operations. Of particular concern are small scale terrorist attacks directed against restaurants, cafes, hotels, and bars where agents and their assets meet. They point to the July 23 bomb blast at an Istanbul cafe near the Galata Bridge which is frequented by Turks and foreigners. The relatively low yield blast injured two people, a Dutchman and a Turk. Turkey remains a central focus by U.S. intelligence agencies on WMD proliferation because of its close links to the former Soviet Central Asian states, Pakistan, Israel, and former Warsaw Pact eastern European nations. The Marriott Hotel in Jakarta was car bombed on August 5, 2003, just a few weeks after the White House leaked Valerie Plame's name and her NOC firm, Brewster Jennings & Associates, to several reporters, including columnist Robert Novak. Some 14 people were killed and 148 injured in the Marriott bombing. According to intelligence sources, a covert team of CIA agents on a classified mission were due to stay and meet at the hotel the day the bombing occurred but they canceled their reservations at the last minute when they were tipped off that they were targets for an attack. The CIA team was reportedly involved in the capture in Thailand of Al Qaeda terrorist chief Hambali, thought to have been involved, in addition to the Bali nightclub and other bombings, in trying to procure radioactive material (cesium-137 and cobalt-60) smuggled from the former Soviet Union via Laos to Thailand. It is not known whether any Brewster Jennings NOCs or assets were members of the CIA team that captured Hambali but the terrorist's connections to an international network of radioactive material smugglers would suggest CIA Counter Proliferation Division (CPD) involvement at a minimum. Plame and her Brewster Jennings colleagues reported to the CPD. The Jakarta bombing was blamed on Al Qaeda's Indonesian affiliate, Jemaah Islamiya.


http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/

This probably needs it's own thread! WOW!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. I agree, kick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. Implications of this article are earth-shattering
I liked it better when I was naive and knew who the good guys and the bad guys were.

Is the rug going to be pulled out from under the public perception of who we are and what we do as a nation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. Give them immunity for testimony? Yeah - like Fitzgerald want to
sit and listen to Rove & Libby lie again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelewis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. No, it's a Senate Hearing - He wouldn't be there - only Rove & Libby
and anyone else they chose to help them whitewash his story. Don't look for it to happen though. If it does, we've got them on RICO violations for conspiracy to obstruct justice and a few other statutes. Roberts would have to be insane to try it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Right. Okay. The Repukes in congress are going to run an alternative
reality to an ongoing investigation that Scotty or Bush will not talk about because they don't want to interfear in an ongoing investigation. I'd love to see that one happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
32. Pelt him with emails, the more the better:
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 07:13 PM by roguevalley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
40. I hope you folks don't worry too much about this.
As far as I can see this is a very good development. Lets consider...
1. The bastards in the White House are in deep shit
2. Every favor is to be called and every operative is put into action

...BUT...we have reached a tipping point. If you haven't noticed, every move they make backfires on them.

...SO...by getting their lieutenants into the fray, they are actually tyeing the rats to the sinking ship. Come '06, guys like ROberts will pay, as long as they're tied to the ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-26-05 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
44. Neo-Cons vs. CIA wont sit well with Mom and Pop Gop. Look for poll drop.
Edited on Tue Jul-26-05 11:06 PM by McCamy Taylor
And any Congressman dumb enough to do what Sensenbrenner has already done had better be in the safest Republican district imaginable, because 2006 is going to be a tough year for the GOP.

This whole thing stinks of Cheney. He lacks political sense, likes to play hardball cause it makes him feel macho, but is clueless when it comes to manipulating people. I think Rove is so compromised that he cant orchestrate an effective response right now. Karen Hughes could do a lot better, but I dont see her sticking her neck out to save Rove's sorry ass. She is much more likely to be behind things such as *'s selection of Roberts, the administration's recent interest in the genocide in Africa---stuff that will improve *'s PR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gelliebeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
46. Sent a letter to Feinstein
since she is my Senator and I told her what I thought about Roberts partisan ploy to silence Fitzgerald. I urged her (FWIW) to stand up and not to be a party to this.
Fingers x's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
48. Roberts stunt isn't going to work
because this is not the same situation has with the Iran-Contra hearings. What happened with the Iran Contra hearings was that they occurred before the federal investigation. The Senate granted immunity to folks like Ollie for their testimony to Congress and then whatever they told Congress could not be used has evidence later on in any federal investigation or trial.

This time we have exactly the opposite situation. Rove and the rest have already testified to the Grand Jury. The Senate can not immunize them at this point because it is too late, their testimony is already on the record and is now considered evidence.

The only thing that may happen has a result of Roberts grand standing is that Fitzgerald wraps things up faster then expected in order to bring indictments before Congress comes back from recess and tries to pull anymore crap.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
49. Pro-Treason = Enemy of the State
Go ahead Roberts, make everyone's day. The Scarlet T's are being prepared as we wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alizaryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
51. EVEN IF THIS SCENERIO PLAYED OUT...
Would it prevent prosecution for perjury and conspiracy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC