Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak BUSTED!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:14 AM
Original message
Novak BUSTED!
In a strange twist in the investigation, the grand jury -- acting on a tip from Wilson -- has questioned a person who approached Novak on Pennsylvania Avenue on July 8, 2003, six days before his column appeared in The Post and other publications, Wilson said in an interview. The person, whom Wilson declined to identify to The Post, asked Novak about the "yellow cake" uranium matter and then about Wilson, Wilson said. He first revealed that conversation in a book he wrote last year. In the book, he said that he tried to reach Novak on July 8, and that they finally connected on July 10. In that conversation, Wilson said that he did not confirm his wife worked for the CIA but that Novak told him he had obtained the information from a "CIA source."

Novak told the person that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA as a specialist in weapons of mass destruction and had arranged her husband's trip to Niger, Wilson said. Unknown to Novak, the person was a friend of Wilson and reported the conversation to him, Wilson said.

Novak and his attorney, James Hamilton, have declined to discuss the investigation, as has Fitzgerald.

Harlow, the former CIA spokesman, said in an interview yesterday that he testified last year before a grand jury about conversations he had with Novak at least three days before the column was published. He said he warned Novak, in the strongest terms he was permitted to use without revealing classified information, that Wilson's wife had not authorized the mission and that if he did write about it, her name should not be revealed.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/26/AR2005072602069.html

All the public lies can't undo what's already been said behind the scenes. Novak is revealed as the "douchebag of liberty" in all his glory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. I remember this story from a couple of years ago
It circulated back then. I'm not sure what you mean about Novak being busted, unless he lied to the grand jury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. I suspect he did
I think he's in a world of trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Does Novak look good in Orange
with manecle and shackle jewelery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DELUSIONAL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Does he get to keep his false teeth in jail??
They could be used as a weapon - couldn't they?

bushie could pardon is buddies -- Rove, Scooter -- etc. but Novak is probably one of the disposable ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. I'm concerned that without conjugal visits
with his Corvette, Robert may go insane.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
27. His teeth are a set of WMD's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. Hmm. Let's see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. imenja is right, this is old news, though not unimportant news
However wrong what Novak did, it is not a crime in and of itself. Now if he's done other stuff, we'll see.

Funny we don't know his other source either and that he hasn't been asked to say so under oath
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. I disagree. The article says the CIA twice told Novak not to mention
Plame in his story. And ... the CIA official told Novak that there was no truth to the story that Plame had sent Wilson to Niger.

Novak goes to print after that and he's not guilty of outing a CIA agent?

I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. the statute only covers government employees
with national security status. Novak cannot be convicted under that statute. If he lied to the grand jury, however, he could face a perjury charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. If Novak was a member of Operation Mockingbird, or whatever,
he was a CIA operative. That would make it illegal for him to reveal CIA information no matter how he obtained it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. that's a stretch
I guess you'll find out once Fitzgerald completes the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. It is only a stretch today. When I worked for the DOD as a teacher,
I had to sign a non-disclosure agreement. As a military brat, my father could have been disciplined for any acknowledgements that I made (from 7 on.) Stretch is what they would have you believe, but them they would have you believe that it is no big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. and what's the non disclosure agreement at CNN?
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 09:13 PM by imenja
and the newspapers that Novak runs his column in? Just because you hate someone doesn't mean he is subject to prosecution under a very narrowly constructed federal statute. But by now you must be aware of terms of the statute and have decided that you simply don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. You missed my point. If I, as an employee of the DOD in the '70's,
had to sign an agreement that I was not a homosexual (for which I could be fired and proscuted,) and that I could not disclose classified information however it came my way, then, if and only if, Robert Novak worked for the CIA, he would have had to sign an agreement.

The newspapers, not CIA, would have no agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. It aint just Novak that's busted !
This kind of report in the WP has very strong legs. Once the speculation starts, there will be no end until the end.

Bye bye Bush !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Okay - this is confusing. This isn't the same person who said
"Rove says your wife is fair game?. I guess I should read the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. Rove said that to Chris Matthews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
7. There are good eggs in Washington. Somewhere there are good
& smart & honorable eggs. We see glimpses of these quiet little eggs.

Here is to the good eggs in Washington!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. At that time
I recall reading that Wilson got a call from a "journalist" who told him "officials" had said his wife was fair game.

Wilson is no schoolboy. He laid the trap for Novak and Novak fell into it. Verified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. The good guys always come out on top. I know it! I just know it!
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 02:15 AM by applegrove
Can't quite figure it all out at this point. Too many unnamed sources. Not enough first person. We will just have to wait for it all to unfold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
17. Question about Republican Spin I keep hearing.
Last Sunday - Ben Stein (who I absolutely HATE!) did an editorial on CBS or something on how Bush should stand by Rove because Nixon threw his aides to the wolves and look what happened to him.

Anyway the first thing he said was that Valerie Plame was not a secret foreign agent, but had a desk job at the CIA in Virginia - so she is not an undercover agent on foreign soil, so no crime. I know this is wrong - but I want to know the details of HOW wrong it is.

I know she works in a desk job now, but I thought she was part of a "front" company, and that the company's cover was blown and the lives of her informants were put at risk.

Could someone give me the no spin - no B.S. version of her job at the time she was uncovered by Novak. I just got a new job in another city and I've been so busy I haven't been able to follow this story enough to know this.

BTW - I don't know how these people can get away with spewing these lies on TV and no one ever corrects them????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magnolia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Their was a hearing with CIA members...
...that explained this a lot clearer than I can...but, here goes.

A covert person works on assignments. When their assignment is over, they take a desk job until the next assignment comes along. This does not change their status. The comparison they made was like someone who works in the police station by day, then goes out at night, under-cover, to do drug busts.

The main point they were making was that it's not just the covert person who is in danger if outed. All their contacts are in danger. If these people, all over the world, see that we can't keep our coverts a secret, they won't be willing to work with us. So our very national security is in danger when a covert person is outed. The fact that that person works at a desk occasionally and drives back and forth to work everyday has nothing to do with. People do work at the CIA at regular jobs. With the coverts, not even their co-workers know they are covert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #18
25. Thanks All of you for the information!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lfairban Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Try this:
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 02:44 PM by lfairban
CORRECTING THE RECORD ON VALERIE PLAME

by

Larry C. Johnson

. . .

As noted in the joint letter submitted to Congressional leaders earlier this week, the RNC is repeating the lie that Valerie was nothing more than a glorified desk jockey and could not possibly have any cover worth protecting. To those such as Victoria Toensing, Representative Peter King, P. J. O'Rourke, and Representative Roy Blunt I can only say one thing—you are wrong. I am stunned that some political leaders have such ignorance about a matter so basic to the national security structure of this nation.

. . .

http://noquarter.typepad.com/my_weblog/2005/07/correcting_the_.html

. . . and this:

CORRECTING THE RECORD ON VALERIE PLAME
Harlow said that after Novak's call, he checked Plame's status and confirmed that she was an undercover operative. He said he called Novak back to repeat that the story Novak had related to him was wrong and that Plame's name should not be used. But he did not tell Novak directly that she was undercover because that was classified.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/26/AR2005072602069_2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oge Donating Member (60 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. sorry to come in late on this but
...no one can give you the real deal on her job because her work is/was classified. i think you are caught in the spin that says she wasn't a real covert operative because she worked at a desk. well, that's bull. for every covert in the field, there's a bunch at desks, just as for every soldier in the trench there's support personnel behind him/her. these distinctions are false and nothing more than talking points put out by repuke strategists trying to do damage control.

the best documentary evidence on this as far as i can find is the 6.10.03 State Dept one that indicated her status and id were SECRET:

http://www.startribune.com/stories/587/5517901.html

and that should answer that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Suziedemocrat, you ask
" I don't know how these people can get away with spewing these lies on TV and no one ever corrects them????"

Maybe if we had the Fairness Doctrine reinstated we would then be given, by law, the ability to correct them.

Is my assumption correct?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
20. So, will Harlow take the fall for all of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Reciprocity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
23. Coincidence or on purpose?
Capital Gang is gone, so is Crossfire. Two shows on CNN, that Douche-Bag was on both canceled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. Not Really...
Everyone knows what happened, he didn't break any law... he's just an ass-hole!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
30. Novakula should only be picking up the soap in a shower at Leavenworth...
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 09:25 PM by ocelot
... just on general principles. It should be illegal to be that much of an asshole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
31. Harlow detail was new to me - very interesting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadisonProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-28-05 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
33. He's a traitor. Why is he not behind bars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC