Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are Zogby's NH results so different from all the other polls?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:24 PM
Original message
Why are Zogby's NH results so different from all the other polls?
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 12:36 PM by Feanorcurufinwe


Clark 15
Dean 20
Edwards 16
Kerry 38
Lieberman 5
http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/nhpoll/demtrack/


Clark 11
Dean 17
Edwards 12
Kerry 37
Lieberman 7
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/polls/tracking_poll/

Clark 10
Dean 17
Edwards 9
Kerry 38
Lieberman 5
http://www.suffolk.edu/suprc/pres/jan26_04/update.html



Clark 13
Dean 25
Edwards 10
Kerry 36
Lieberman 10
http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr040126.asp


Clark 13
Dean 28
Edwards 12
Kerry 31
Lieberman 9
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=793



They all seem pretty similar till we get to Zogby. Why are his results so much different from every other pollster?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. Zogby is cosy with Hannity, they want to prop up Dean
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robsul82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. C'mon, jenk, you're better than that crap.
Chill.

Later.

RJS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R3dD0g Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I don't know whether Zogby is cozy with Hannity
or not. I know that the times I've seen him on call in shows he professes to be a Democrat.

His numbers are so different because he takes special pains to predict whether the person is going to actually show up at the polls. Most other polls just try to get a will you vote? mix with the correct demographics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Zogby does a lot sifting through demographics
to arrive at most likely support on election day.
He really is far off the other ones so I have to assume he's at the upper ends of MOE's biased toward Dean favorables for some reason here.
I suspect Kerry will be a couple points above 30 and Dean a couple below. I don't see a Kerry blow out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Gallup Poll you list is outdated; Are the others old as well?
The latest is here:

http://www.gallup.com/poll/releases/pr040126.asp


POLL ANALYSES
January 26, 2004


Seen as Best Candidate to Beat Bush, Kerry Poised for N.H. Victory
Dean a clear second; close race for third among Clark, Edwards, and Lieberman


by David W. Moore
GALLUP NEWS SERVICE

PRINCETON, NJ -- Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry is poised to win the New Hampshire Democratic primary this Tuesday, according to the final 2004 CNN/USA Today/Gallup tracking poll of likely voters. Widely perceived by voters as the most likely candidate to beat President George W. Bush in the November general election, Kerry leads former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean 36% to 25%.

In a virtual tie for third place, well behind Dean, are retired Gen. Wesley Clark with 13% of the vote, and Sens. John Edwards (North Carolina) and Joe Lieberman (Connecticut), each with 10% support. Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich and civil rights activist Al Sharpton each garner 1% of the vote, with another 4% still undecided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I put the new one in the original post; it doesn't change anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
17. The one you cite is the one the poster has
Kerry 36, Dean 25.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. He fixed it; He had an old one earlier
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. he adjusts numbers to take into account other factors
and his numbers do turn out to be more accurate than others at times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poseidon Donating Member (87 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Zogby sauces his polls
That's what I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. I've noticed
that Zogby tends to look at momentum as oppose to who is in the lead.

That is my honest opinion. Anybody else share this sentiment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
R3dD0g Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Flush Slimeball said Zogby was
'saucing the polls' in 96. In 2000 Flush said Zogby was right on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Zogby predicted Hillary would lose in 2000
but he picked the President correctly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. He was working for the N.Y. Post when he did those Hillary-Lazio
polls, so I wouldn't be surprised if they told him to oversample Repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'd like to see what the local newspapers are polling
they're the one's I trust
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. who is that guy with john and elizabeth edwards ?
who is that guy in the pic with john and elizabeth edwards ? and it's a nice pic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. John's brother in law, Jim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. On the eve of the 2000 election
Zogby had Gore and Bush tied in California.

The next day, Gore won california by 1.5 million votes.

Zogby is great on national polls, but shaky on state polls. I have a better opinion these days of polls taken by institutions close to the state action. The Des Moines Register absolutely nailed the Iowa outcome the day before the vote. Way closer than the others. Just my humble O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
West Coast Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Yes, that's another example
Zogby is not great with state polls; and Primaries are even trickier than normal elections to call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. He had Gore ahead of Bush in Florida though. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WilliamPitt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Gore was ahead of Bush in Florida
so chalk one up for Zogby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
16. "Slight weights were added"
"Slight weights were added to party, age, education, and gender to more accurately reflect the voting population."
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=793

Is this like when you buy a pound of fish, and the grocer puts his finger on the scale "to more accurately reflect the fish"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. CNN/USAT/Gallup had it at 30-25 a couple of days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. 38-25 today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Go with it.
:shrug:



I'll go with tomorrow's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tryanhas Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
25. Polls don't mean a thing
AT ALL

About 25 to 30% of the people who are going to vote on tomorrow are INDEPENDENTS.

They are underpolled, but they are a huge voting bloc.

They are going to make the difference tomorrow, and that's why Edwards is going to finish in second. Those McCain Independents/Republicans (same day registers) love John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TLM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
26. Read what Zogby says right under the poll... undecideds factored in.


In today's release, Leaners among the Undecideds have been factored in. Without Leaners, the percentage of Undecideds is 13%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomNickell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Sounds like Xogby changed the measurement in the middle.
Gives a false sense of movement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
27. Interesting graphic on the Gallup poll...
Edited on Mon Jan-26-04 01:21 PM by mzmolly



I don't trust polls. This is all about expectations and if they prop Dean up and he doesn't do as well, he's seen as a failure. I think Zogby was full of shit in Iowa, and I honestly don't trust him now. 40% of Iowa voters went with their second choice - they bought the media bull shit that Dean is unelectable. Lucky for John Kerry.

I'll be happy with a second place finish, I don't care about the margin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Considering we've been hearing for months
that the biggest issue for voters in NH is the ability to beat Bush, that sure looks like good news for Kerry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
29. Zogby wants to scare Kerry supporters --
What a guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Feanorcurufinwe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. A GOTV effort for Kerry?
Nothing could be more effective than Zogby's poll.

Your supporters becoming complacent is one of the big dangers as a frontrunner.

Thank you Zogby.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TopesJunkie Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-26-04 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Dream a little dream --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC