Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Condoleezza Rice at the Center of the Plame Scandal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:54 PM
Original message
Condoleezza Rice at the Center of the Plame Scandal

The Source Beyond Rove

http://www.counterpunch.com/


It was September 2002, and then-National Security Advisor, now-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was fastening on CNN perhaps the most memorable and frightening single link in the Bush regime's chain of lies propagandizing the war on Iraq. Behind her carefully planted one-liner with its grim imagery was the whole larger hoax about Saddam Hussein possessing or about to acquire weapons of mass destruction, a deception as blatant and inflammatory as claims of the Iraqi dictator's ties to Al Qaeda.

Rice's demagogic scare tactic was also very much part of the tangled history of alleged Iraqi purchases of uranium from Niger, the fabrication leading to ex-Ambassador Joseph Wilson's now famous exposé of the fraud, the administration's immediate retaliatory "outing" of Wilson's wife Valerie Plame as a CIA operative, and now the revelation that the President's supreme political strategist Karl Rove and Vice President Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff Lewis Libby were involved in that potentially criminal leak-altogether the most serious political crisis Bush has faced. In fact, though her pivotal role has been missed entirely ­or deliberately ignored-in both the media feeding frenzy and the rising political clamor, Condoleezza Rice was also deeply embroiled in the Niger uranium-Plame scandal, arguably as much as or more so than either Rove or Libby.

For those who know the invariably central role of the NSC Advisor in sensitive political subjects in foreign policy and in White House leaks to the media as well as tending of policy, especially in George W. Bush's rigidly disciplined, relentlessly political regime, Rice by both commission and omission was integral in perpetrating the original fraud of Niger, and then inevitably in the vengeful betrayal of Plame's identity. None of that spilling of secrets for crass political retribution could have gone on without her knowledge and approval, and thus complicity. Little of it could have happened without her participation, if not as a leaker herself, at least with her direction and with her scripting.

The evidence of Rice's complicity is increasingly damning as it gathers over a six-year twisting chronology of the Nigerien uranium-Wilson-Plame affair, particularly when set beside what we also know very well about the inside operations of the NSC and Rice's unique closeness to Bush, her tight grip on her staff, and the power and reach that went with it all. What follows isn't simple. These machinations in government never are, especially in foreign policy. But follow the bouncing ball of Rice's deceptions, folly, fraud and culpability. Slowly, relentlessly, despite the evidence, the hoax of the Iraq-Niger uranium emerges as a central thread in the fabricated justification for war, and thus in the President's, Rice's, and the regime's inseparable credibility. The discrediting of Wilson, in which the outing his CIA wife is irresistible, becomes as imperative for Rice as for Rove and Libby, Bush and Cheney. And when that moment comes, she has the unique authority, and is in a position, to do the deed. Motive, means, opportunity-in the classic terms of prosecution, Rice had them all.

-snip- (this snip is the very long, detailed time-line of her crimes, etc.)

----------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Jesus, this is worse than Watergate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Don't forget Bolton, Feith, Hadley & even Poindexter
Remember the OSP. when the CIA and FBI could not nor would not come up with the intelligence the Administration wanted they formed their very own "intelligence agency" called Office of Special Plans and even Poindexter was brought in to start a program called TIPS. It was designed to put out disinformation and muddy the waters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shelley806 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very interesting read, and I'm sure not a new idea to many, but it was
to me...thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, thanks for that
"...she has the unique authority, and is in a position, to do the deed."

Who leaked the highly classified info from the CIA??? I've got 3 suspects now.

1) Bush Sr. He visited the WH. Maybe he came to tell Junior that Junior had stepped in it while trying to arrange for WMDs to appear in Iraq and Poppy had to wise him up.

2) Cheney. Cheney found out through the Office of Special Plans who was combing the raw intelligence to come to the proper conclusions.

3) Rice, the National Security Advisor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Burried News Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I like Cheney as the skell.
One thought I had, for all of them to be in on this they had to be very confident they had the very highest support (protection) - that isn't Bush 43 or Rice. I don't exclude 41.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. So THAT's why she got promoted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. Important article. Thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow!
That's the best timeline...and most well-documented timeline I have seen....
Yes Condi is in it up to her lying eyeball! :grr: :grr: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I remember when it was
revealed, during the Bolton nomination hearings, that it was she who had instructed the State Dept. not to release to the Committee, the documents they requested which would have revealed who Bolton had been inquiring about ~

AIRC, she intitially denied this ~ but I couldn't understand why she would have done so. Now, in the context of her presence on Airforce One, and the recent revelations about the very important CIA memo, her reasons are far more understandable.

I recall also, that it was reported that it may have been Colin Powell who was working behind the scenes to let the Committee know about Bolton's demands for information about certain individuals.

I thought then, that Bolton was the one seeking information on Valerie Plame, but I have sence read that he may have been seeking information on Colin Powell, Armitage and Tenet!

But Condy's desperation to prevent the Democrats from getting their hands on the evidence of Bolton's prying, makes perfect sense now. She knew where the investigation was going, and at the time, we didn't! The pieces are all falling into place ~

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Good analysis
Although I'm still puzzled about why Powell could have been showing the memo around AF One. What did he have to gain in that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Remember
that at this point there is no proof he did show the memo around AF1. There is a serious question regarding if he did. But there is other evidence that indicates that others were aware of the memo for some time.

Isn't it odd that there is a State Department memo that was not new, but then had to be faxed to the Secretary of State on AF1? Something odd about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I'm making a slight leap
of logic here because we have other witnesses saying that:

1. They saw Powell carrying the memo aboard the plane.
2. They saw Ari Fleischer reading the memo.

Maybe it's not the same memo.

And yes, it is odd that the memo was not new and had to be "reworked" and sent to Powell on the very cusp of his departure to Africa.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donkeyotay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I was wondering about that
Edited on Wed Jul-27-05 05:27 PM by donkeyotay
during the Bolton nomination hearings, that it was she who had instructed the State Dept. not to release to the Committee, the documents they requested which would have revealed who Bolton had been inquiring about ~

I remember Sharon was gushing on about how brilliant Rice was... I think she's really being played. Ooh. Dr. Rice, you're so brilliant even if you really f'd up 9-11.

It's all consistent with the neocon nincompoop agenda: right down to Judy Miller using Chalabi as her main source. It all makes a lot of sense when you get paranoid enough to see it as a plot.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Well, I think the REAL motive
was that Condi overheard her husb-...Dr. Evi-...the Preznit saying "that gal ol' Joe Wilson's merried to is one hot filly! I'd sure like to milk HER sometime" and Condi KNEW SHE MUST DESTROY HER AT ALL COSTS, she thought, with a steely glow in her flat lizard eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You should try writing novels
you know...Bodice Ripper novels!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flying Dream Blues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yeah, that was the tone I was going for. :)
But not to take away from the seriousness of this, I just feel the need to lighten up sometimes or I will go crazy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick because
this need to be read...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lecky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-27-05 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm sure she does whatever the neocons demand of her
I really think Bolton was the person who told Judith Miller...maybe even forged some documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC